Jump to content

Boberro

Members
  • Posts

    6362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Boberro

  1. Congrats :D I would invest in crypto again but got accident, my pet threw liquid on part and it was no more. It was just one GPU which I acquired by friend to start mining. Yep, it is a risk but can give nice profit if success is made. Moreover people do various risky things in daily life, surely investing few dollars is safer than sex with person who we've just met - and people do that, risking nasty diseases later lol :D
  2. Maybe people thought also about your working conditions, bureau, design photos ect. ED posted years ago a cut of their day in the bureau with photos during work, team ect.
  3. Stop whinning about mining. Everybody can do that, so it would be better to buy a "miner", wait a while and earn for new more expensive GFX card ^^
  4. This product has been known for years that it needs a PC which is 2 years ahead. This was the case in LOMAC series and less in DCS but still present despite of few optimizations.
  5. Anyone tried 2.5? In my case I see no cam through panel, I mean in case of example Su-25T, there is reddish square with elements but no real camera picture.
  6. Well, I do not change my opinion about him^, as I am enough happy and have no need to compare to anybody. It does not mean I undermine this achievement for science which is clearly visible. That would have been done by NASA or Russian Space Agency if funded well enough, though ^^
  7. @gabgio - I agree ^^ No, I am not kidding :P I just do not see in Musk somebody higher (better) than billionaire who makes own dream successful. He just uses different toys, which are impressive and useful for science. But he didn't make those rockets, he didn't engineer them. He seems to be good manager and can persuade people to work for his dream, which came very useful for science. I like what has been achieved by this launch, but I just don't put Musk on the throne as mostly anyone with high amount of money can realise own dream, useful or less useful for mankind. His are mostly useful so that is good :D
  8. Is it so big success? I do not say it is completely not but the only thing I see to be fancy about is that the rocket has been made by private person, not government. But technology is not breakthrough, if there weren't cutbacks many years ago, the governmental projects would achieved that long time ago. As billionaire Musk can do whatever he wants so he hired people to do the job.
  9. They will use radar or EOS to lock on you. Radar is better because of more information but you will see it on your RWR. If they use simpler EOS then you see nothing. R-27ET has same IR head as R-73. Both have to get lock before launch, otherwise short after the head of the missile would be broken. So effective ET range has been decreased because of more realistic behaviour. No more maddog IR missiles :D You can fire IR in manual mode without lock, but it doesn't guarantee success, surely not for long or middle ranges.
  10. Not with T\ET anymore. Long time ago it was possible and widely used tactic where you released the missile 30 km (or further if on 12k km alt) from the enemy lol :D You found him on radar, projected more-less its path (example toward you head to head), turned radar off and released ET. Enemy thought that you don't lock him on radar and ET later acquired targed. It was total fantasy as R-27E(T) are LOBL missiles. Anyway, it was fun though :D Later as people saw "toilet paper" on the sky while having no waring on RWR and quite long distance, they suspected that ET is already flying to them, but they had to be more experienced pilots to notice such danger.
  11. It will start to hunt, whatever it's gonna see. Even your stepmother :P In previous times people liked to fire R-27ET R-77 without lock. It was nice trick and Eagle drivers were angry :D
  12. Low settings (all) due to quite old computer but single player took 14 GB of RAM for one default mission lol. I even didn't try to MP...
  13. Yes. Fictional or real, doesn't matter if the quality is high. It is much easier to do fictional map than replicate real area, ED doesn't help either, keeping map tools for themselves so for now there is no way to make terrain as "common modder".
  14. Well, surely they will have better kill ratio than crappy R-27R\ER family. At least player can eat chips after firing missile 2x further than enemy with R-27 :D Can't wait to spamraam those missiles against poor reds :D
  15. Give it already, damn it. I've just travelled 1500 km especially for 2.5 release :D My free time is not endless.
  16. I would gladly see a MiG-31 mod with R-33. Various mods like Su-17, MiG-31 are already known but such one should be allowed. At least is on my server when I run one. Thus it will be nice to see flying cow vs. smooth F-14 :)
  17. I see that in the last movie of Huey, there are textures with fake buildings. Is it gonna be final or removed? It looks quite bad IMO.
  18. Unfortunately 25T is quite rare plane, around 40 ever built in various versions (T, TM, TM experimental) so it is rather not serial production plane. It was more like test lab for current SM Frogfoots. What is interesting, now more than 20 years after T Russia is capable of adding TV all weather pod for Su-25SM, making it finally more than just poor bomb\rocket carrier like it was usually up today.
  19. This image looks not so fancy, it looks more like DCS implementation (so very simple), than real one. But I presume you know that so it is just very alpha state of Lantirn, final version will be much more realistic.
  20. Can't wait to fly together with Ka-50 as team of mass destruction :D Hopefully they will upgrade old and poooooooor Kamov's avionics too. This landmower is very outdated in regards of self defence or night time attacks.
  21. I haven't bought it because I do not buy unknown modules. I am quite sure it will be good, but rule is rule. I wouldn't buy auto which is not complete, I will not buy game which has still half year to get just frame, wheels and basic cockpit instruments :P
  22. No, we shouldn't. Eagle Dynamics hasn't done new Caucasus mainly because they love community (I guess they do) but because it makes their main commercial branch much more popular (read: up to visual standards of rest content). It was just less work to re-model whole Caucasus than create map so large from scratch. Of course remodelled Caucasus is not so detailed like Hormuz but it was good decision for them in terms of good product rating on the market. So, no. There should not be payable. If someone wants to donate then why not... I would pay for the rest of the region (example Crimea) in the same standards of upgraded Caucasus. I would pay for Poland, Belarus, Ukraine and part of Russia there. It was said years ago that map tools would be released. Up today there haven't been.
  23. If you want to do non-military plane than model Jumbo 787 or 747-8 than some plane for spreading anti-bug pesticide over a corn-field :P Just half-kiddin'.
  24. Quite big price I would say. I understand that after normal price kicks in, we get fully working product without some kind of deep issues ect?
×
×
  • Create New...