theGozr

Here a quick search for some 190 flying.. now look at the normal pilot position. The helmet has a specific function and it's not really made for crashes :)

OK You have to see how the Gun sight is actually attached to the dashboard frame because normally it's quite high and pretty much in the middle of a windshield.. So it maybe possible that the gun sight was higher than the actual drawing which is often the case.

Kodoss are those drawings from a model kit ? The gun sight should be quite easy to lean over and pretty much up your face so imo a bar shouldn't interfere with the gun sight at all only if you really move up your seat .

BeachAV8R +1

Fantastic.. Make me want to create something :)

I presume that in many radial engine aicraft the front visibility mostly at take off would of been horrible and with a aiming device just on the middle of your front shield.. Almost all the pilots positions in DCS, IL2, RoF are wrong... and can be corrected. In modern days Yak9U for example we used to take them off or not even mount them.. the pipper was smaller than in the German aircraft and it was very annoying. they do look good dho.. but landing in modern airport and taxi, traffic etc.. it is a "pain". you open the canopy and start your zigzags with a long stretch neck ;) Here a little crude view . But I may talk out of my a** right now since I do not know the plane..

Something about this drawing .. to me it is wrong. The line of sight is not from the actual pilot position.. If I am not mistaken and taking experience of WW2 aircraft flown.. the actual pilot should seat higher closer to the canopy to obtain a maximum comfortable visibility and forward.. in RL you can rest on the back of the seat while taking a nap .... ;)... or cruising around looking at the above sky. The pilot in my opinion should be higher, seating with parachute glues to his behind and more forward on instrumentation position or alert .. I never really tried to check it out on German aircraft .

Great work but how does it look like ? Thank you

It's not like this...

Important...? Important!! yes 1.2.7 all AFM.

Well yes Mirage III in top of the list.. Mirage III and MiG-21 .. that would generate some serious fun and sales :)

Extend the date of one week...... !!!

Hummm! ? why why why ? :) :cry_2:

Yes comfirmed better frame rate smoother. 6970's

:) Great !

Oui LOL vas falloire que je me remette au boulot :) ca prend du temps surtout maintenant avec 3 enfants :) J etais de Montpellier ;)

Alors la je ne comprends pas non plus.. mais avant tout c'est d avoir des avions avec des AFM sinon ca fait de beau AI's :)

Well MiG-25 is great but it would be for real high altitude . SU-22M5 Great to have Mirage III perfect for the MiG-21 scenarios Yakolev Yak-130/ and Alphajet etc.. great for all around and aerobatics and trainings MiG-31 hoooo yes :)

I wounder about the AMD R series

It would be very interesting for me .. I flew Yak9 and MiG15 a lot :) I know them quite well..

haaaaaa!! Great LOL Thanks :)

"The only reason to release an SDK is to help your product grow. No one on this side has any desire to be the bottleneck in that process." +1 :) Can't wait.

g-breath effect ?? this is good in movies but in RL nope ! Must go or button choice .

I see Thx