theGozr

In the 1.2.7 all FFB from at list side winder 2 are bad..

http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=119490 Here from the Beta to this 1.2.7 release.

DCS:World air Turbulences via online servers. I decided to bump this old thread since now time passed ( years ). since November-2006 So now that we do have more AFM aircraft and more coming soon what about the subject? Do we have this very.. very important online turbulences under 1.2.7 update? - Read here http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=18171&highlight=turbulances+online

I decided to bump this old thread since now time passed. since November-2006 So now that we do have more AFM aircraft and more coming soon what about the subject? Do we have this very.. very important online turbulence under 1.2.7 update?

If only we could...

Great looking pit :)

:) Frostie.. "head position not correct" well that is vailable for ALL released DCS aircraft.. ;)

Faith yes ! ;)

MiG-21 news? A huge blow Well in my opinion this is a huge blow.. DCS with out the MiG-21 of that level may not get off well. To me the future of DCS was set on this release. If there is no more AFM aircraft worth as opponent what will become to DCS series? Something needs to be done and fixed because right now it's a serious blow.

Mirage III

Thanks Mustang and Peter :) got it, good move IMO. I wish to have more time to do things with DCS :)

Why Open Beta on the 1.2.7 ? DCS 1.2.7 Open Beta.. I wounder why this version need a open Beta ? what really changed? no new Terrain engine? Just very curious Thanks

This need to be fixed and not been a tweak. Thx

No need to go that far for disctrics .. between 7000 and 9000 is better than 10 000 .. 7000 is a great number and gain fps.

" exceeds 20 players " Well that is the problem.. we need to find opponents adversaries to activate the interest of many pilots.. same as RoF if no new terrain map are made people loose interest .. if flying aircraft FM not AFM opponents people loose interest . what is the opponent of the P51 ? KA50 ? A10 ? maybe SU25's .. ,

F15 AMF or SU-27 AFM ? :)

I started this long subjects long ago and created the first mod about head position. head position has nothing to do with FOV, you should be able to get your favorite FOV but the point of origin of the eyes head position is a must and should be as realistic as possible. Pete did a great work and approaching a great result. Still slightly off because of using a misplaced point of origin. At the time I ask DCS to use a correct point of origin and send it to the 3D designer to create the 3D cockpit in relation of the correct seating position... Nope. IMO the sight should have different settings, game like we do have in the original DCS and realistic. Now using the VR glasses you will understand very fast that having 1:1 view and correct head position is one most importance. Like in IL2 the head position was set in the 3D model itself to fix this I had to correct the sight position from the 3D model it self. for example All my DCS/IL2/ IL2BoS/RoF/FSX do have a correct position and it so much more enjoyable and realistic. The neck in DCS is a great addition.. Fantastic I would say. :) I do have a big experience in aircraft in RL and this original sight disturbed me since day 1. I collaboration should be great on that matter to obtain a sim with a most realistic views.

Wags. "The bad news is that with his input, we have identified several more areas that need adjustment" I'm pretty sure this "is" actually positive news for all. ;-) Great work.

Ho Yes agree much better :)

Realistic is a big word.. I hope the shade, reflections etc will be better because it's still very cartoonish to me atm... but it's hard to tell from pictures .. I hope for the best

I have doubt about EDGE..

Anyone else with a AMD R9 290? ? Thanks :)

IRL the ground is far from been blurred.

DCS Vietnam DCS Korea DCS Middle East MiGs and Mirage III's That would be something.. :)

Ha Thx ;)