This choice would mean something like F-15 vs A-10. It's not like modern angles-fighters doesnt have any energy at all. In your scenario, I would go for energy aswell...
In the end it's all about training, experience and SA (newer aircraft usually increases SA). :)
Jag kan kanske hosta ikväll om jag har tid. Har en del missions men mina Squad-aktiviteter kanske hindrar mig :) Har en 20/3 Mbit anslutning och ping till svergie borde vara toppen ;)
Indeed, it is quite irrelevant. But since there are factual errors there, I wouldnt be so sure that all about the flying is the solid truth...
Thats your opinion. However I still stand by my, that you should take it with a grain of salt...
Isnt getting shot down half the point with RF. You learn from the mistakes and avoid doing the same in the real scenarios... :huh:
There are quite a few factual errors in the debrief from the F-15 Pilot. The MiG-21Bison does not have Israeli radar/ECM, but rather Russian/Indian ones. Also, the MKI does not have Tumansky engines but Lyulka-Saturn ones.
And the fact that it was a debreif for 'Senior retired U.S. Air Force officers' makes me wonder if he might have "strayed" of reality to spice it up abit :)
Not really, The Mi-28 was cheaper and had more commonality with the Mi-24, so the transition would be easier. That doesnt mean Ka-50 was a bad product.