Dappman

What's the "A"?

I would rather something be done about ejecting when out of ammo or fuel than have easy AA refueling. I can only connect for a couple of seconds at most when I try, but I like the challenge and realism and that's why most people play this game.

The votes say otherwise. I'm just trying to present a realistic variant that could be modeled in DCS.

I've been doing a lot of research and it seems that an Su-27M would be the best new Sukhoi variant to have. It was designed in the late 80s and flying in mid 90s, and later further upgraded into the 35S. The M is hugely upgraded compared to the S. Over a dozen were built but it wasn't put into production because the Soviet Union fell. The SM3 is too new to have any data on it. I don't know if there's data on the M version but I would think its much more likely. There's so many Sukhoi 27 variants and not a lot of info its hard to learn about them. It also sucks that the Soviet Union fell because now we have to decide if having a system where only around a dozen examples were made is fair to have in the game. I think it is because if not, you're not going to really have any Russian equipment after the 80s in the game. Also the Su-27M was fully developed and flying it just didn't have the funds to be put into production.

I thought you meant radio chatter lingo. For radios I was also confused but it's actually really simple. The frequencies don't overlap. I don't remember the exact frequency range of each radio, its something like VHF 1 30.00-70.00 VHF 2 12x.xx-15x.xx and then whatever else doesn't fit in there is UHF. The part you need to remember is you can't put ex. 120.00 in VHF 1 or UHF (it will make a noise) so if you're told to go to 120.00 you know it's VHF 2. I think the radios are always right beside each other. EDIT: I forgot it's not called VHF 1 and 2 its AM and FM but it doesn't really matter you don't need to remember which one is which.

I watched videos from Frooglesim and Dslyecxi and I couldn't have done it without them. I'm very decent at flying the KA-50 now. After watching those video the two things that helped me most was learning that the autopilot wants to hold heading and screws you up so fly without AP when you can. The second thing was everyone claims (even in the manual) that the KA-50 isn't affected by rotor blade torque because of its twin opposite rotors and you don't need the rudder to keep it straight. Completely untrue, you do need to use the rudder to keep it straight while in a hover and at speed. Here's the videos. You will be pro in no time.

Russia really needs to create a targeting pod.

I think this just fixed my issue. Have been in MP server for a while no with no problems. :thumbup:

Should I only try this if I'm using beta drivers?

I have an X55. I recommend you stay far away from it. It would actually be a decent HOTAS if it wasn't so expensive for what you get. But the big problem is the quality control. Mine does the ghost buttons thing and turns itself off mid game. I've tried everything to fix it but nothing worked. $250 is a big gamble for a joystick that doesn't work properly. If I had to do it again I would have just saved up for a thrustmaster warthog.

What's that?

Su25 can supercruise too. Not really. The definition for supercruise is going something like Mach 1.5 without afterburner.

They look perfect in game to me.

I get this. I'm not good with computers as I've said before but through Google I've managed to find the "fault module" logs or whatever you call it for my crashes. Some ones that popped up: world.dll, avionics.dll, weather.dll, ZweiBlau.dll, AsyncNet.dll, dcs.exe, d3d9.dll and some others. I don't know if this will help or if its on my end, but there you go. Those are all seperate crashes with the module at fault.

Like title says. I will connect to a server and be on ramp getting 10ish fps. I check GPU usage and it's around 20-30%. This is completely random I think as I'll log out (or crash) and re-renter the same server and its back to 50+fps with high GPU usage. Often times GPU usage is around 60%. DOF off. V Sync off. MSAA and AF both 8X. 7950 GPU, AMD 955 BE CPU. Everything set to HIGH except shadows and traffic (LOW) Mirrors OFF. I have found out that mirrors take a massive FPS drop for me and have them off. For the same reason, GPU usage goes way down with them on and CPU % goes up. DCS.openbeta-20151003-205957.zip DCS.openbeta-Crash-20151003-205957.zip

Space shuttle. It's gotta be.

If you would have bothered to look around you would know that that's already known and their going to be working on it. It's a beta. There's problems with FLIR and Vikrs.

It's already fixed. Go to the Leatherneck section you'll find the fix.

You can't copy the Mig21 as it has different controls now. You have to do it over again.

I'm getting retardedly high frame rates. I can comment a lot more but every things been said. Amazing job.

Uhhh Cobra can I ask for a small favor? I accidentally overwrote the files in the standalone instead of the Beta :D. Do you have the files for the Standalone if it's not too much of your time.

I can't play the Mig21 it just closes DCS World when I try. Doesn't tell me anything.

What's your guys speed? I'm getting around 3mb/s.

Well, it's 1AM here and I'm not working tomorrow. Thanks to Ohgr (god) I don't have to set my beta controls. I'm gonna crack open a beer and see what's going on. I will suffer with the ED developers (not really).

Thanks alot.