Jump to content

Sweep

Members
  • Posts

    1294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Sweep

  1. Awesome! No clue how or why I missed that, only read the bottom of the page earlier... :doh:
  2. how about Mirages on Red? MiG-23 stand-in...(goes fast, crappy missiles, limited radar functionality, short-ish legs)
  3. I used something similar on my TM Warthog, right now I'm using 3 deadzone and 40 curvature on pitch, 3 deadzone and 20-30 curvature on roll. My stick is mounted to the chair, so that might change things a bit.
  4. :thumbup::thumbup: And there we have it, someone grabbed an SME... Thanks Pr1mal.
  5. Check that, I think Scat was talking to the other guy. Edit: Also... Was the ASAT porno really necessary GG?
  6. Yep! Totally forgot to mention that. Isn't it completely immune to chaff or something?
  7. I'll be blowing past all of you at 35,000 and mach 1.5 when the Strike comes out. Have fun with your shiny VTOL, boys! (realizes I have F-35B in my sig, *runs*) :D
  8. You guys make me want to break out the 3 bag loadouts again.
  9. At low/medium altitude and speed, about 8nmi, if he beams, it has a decent chance of hitting, IIRC. That setup really depends on speed and some other stuff. High alt/mach (like 35k and m1.4)? About 15nmi. AIM-120B turns a bit better while burning (better at minimum range, too), AIM-120C has slightly better range.
  10. This might help: http://www.avialogs.com/index.php/en/aircraft/usa/mcdonnelldouglas/f-15eagle/to-1f-15a-1-flight-manual-f-15a-b-c-d-aircraft-block-7-and-up.html
  11. What was your launch range? The AIM-120 doesn't live up to its DLZ usually. Try shooting within 10nmi, you'll get hits.
  12. Which do you like more? :D
  13. From what's been said by F-35 pilots its pretty similar to the F-16 in climb and acceleration...but closer to the Hornet in turning. Heck, even Picard mentioned that! (IIRC) :megalol:
  14. AFAIK you can't do that in the C. There is a day/night switch, but I *think* that's for brightness and not color...
  15. Naaaaah... Bush should have brought more AMRAAMs. :megalol: :megalol:
  16. The Tacview is all sorts of screwed up.
  17. Edit: NVM, I think I misunderstood...lol
  18. AFAIK the A-10 doesn't even use JHMCS, but that other HMD...I forget what its called.
  19. I'm sorry, I've got to ask the stupid question...Are you looking at the RPM gauge? It doesn't move over 96%. I'm guessing 'no', but had to ask.
  20. AFAIK the Mirage is using the A-10/F-15 RWR symbology. Its just not scaled right yet, AFAIK...haven't flown it in the newest updates.
  21. That camo is the missing texture, uhh, texture. Thanks ED for getting rid of that orange stuff! :D
  22. Sweep

    Harrier poll

    I really don't think he meant that in a hostile way. This is a simulation of reality though (or at least the flight/combat element of it), so generally speaking you'd use similar terms to RL. That said, nobody here is going to stop you from defining things differently!
  23. http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/645693/?sphrase_id=2545073 Compare the F-15 to that, might yield better results. :P As for the Mirage, it does FEEL like a darn rocketship, but I don't have charts or anything for it, so I'll just keep enjoying the French space program. :D
  24. This...campaign...is...AWESOME!
×
×
  • Create New...