Jump to content

Veritech

Members
  • Posts

    352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Veritech

  1. Tello, will you be in a Mirage?
  2. Hey Mav! Would it be ok to open a new thread about the tournament when the challengers are confirmed? The thread could be for agressors to coordinate practice sessions between ourselves to train in tactics, comms in order to be a cohesive force. Any idea when will we have the detailed ROE? Thanks in advance Regards, V
  3. Veritech Lonewolf Argentina Mirage 2000
  4. The Mirage improved and matured a lot in this last year. Not to say that RAZBAM is the most transparent and community engaging of all the developers out there, publishing the incoming fixes before they are actually released. Do you own the module?
  5. +1 Amazing news Ironmike!!! Is time to go back to The Magnificient Eight!
  6. We should all be drunk and high to be in a state of mind according to Christmas! (EDIT: +1 on myself :lol:)
  7. :lol: :lol: :lol: Jesus!!! +10
  8. Avoiding smaapraming (which is one of the most common ways of air quaking) would be awesome. Bring on the semi actives bro!
  9. :lol:
  10. I'm in! People need an easy target, so count me in :lol: Veritech Mirage 2000C / Su-27 / F-5E
  11. Does anybody knows why the Mig-23 has been cancelled? Could ED provide an official answer if possible? Thanks. Regards, V
  12. Hey Mav, any liveries for the F-5? Besides the russian "brother", the Mig-28 :P
  13. Veritech here! F-5 / M2000
  14. Thanks man, haven't read that.
  15. It seems thta after the update, I'm unable to start up the engines. I followed the procedures as per the manual an no joy Anybody else having the same issue?
  16. Mini review on the Campaign Dunno how to properly post a video, sorry :(
  17. I wouldn't; I'm almost dne with FC3 aircraft. (Except with the Flanker... sometimes...)
  18. It is great to see that you finally developed an educated way to express your disagreement without resorting to sarcasm. Kudos! :)
  19. If nobody does anything about these situations, I feel compeled to do so.
  20. It is different indeed. Dimentions are slightly different as well as internals are quite different. I never implied that they were similar! :)
  21. Very interesting information indeed! I know no matter how "old" the ECM systems, they remain classified for years and years. I doubt LNS got much information about them. Thanks for sharing!
  22. Do you think that technology from the 80s is still classified in Sweden? Wow! I love the fact we are getting a ground attack aircraft with a working radar, I even prefer this version over the fighter version because of it being original in its role to DCS, but I'd love to the the JA as well.
  23. Although I can't stand Tyler Rogoway and his racism/patriotism/tabloid way of writing, this article is interesting. I never came to know that the huge tail folded down. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/6237/saabs-viggen-could-stick-a-landing-and-takeoff-again-like-no-other-fighter
  24. Is there any chance you guys would start to develop a mid-80s version of the JA-37C when the AJS gets full release? That would me more interesting than a JA-37Di with AMRAAMs and a FC3 layout that you were thinking of as a possibility. I do not want to sound like I'm demanding anything, I just want to know if you had contemplated the idea before! Thanks! Regards, V
  25. Nevermind, I just saw the video in a bigger screen. :lol: Is that last sound related to the RWR?
×
×
  • Create New...