Beeroshima

But ralfi, I heard you retired from dcs and don't play any more. ;) Sent while I should be working instead.

Im also interested in compatibility with Milan's extensions hes currently producing. I've got all 3. =) Sent while I should be working instead.

Its ground radar isnt pod based is it? Sent while I should be working instead.

Can't wait to try this. Might even grab a 2nd warthog stick for comparisons. Sent while I should be working instead.

Any progress on this or are we still stuck launching DCS with a new monitor setup lua every time we switch aircraft?

I guess I should have been more clear. I worry about deciding between the two. The damned russians need to release a Su27M!

Couldn't agree more with all of what you said.

What if we hold a draft where each side elects some representatives. Then, at a specified time, we take turns picking equipment available exclusively by the side who picked it. Fantasy War Draft. =)

I'm sorry, what are you saying? ;)

While I want the F18 sooooooo badly, part of me dreads blue flag when it comes. It without a doubt will make it unbalanced.

[quote=microvax;2846981 Its both fun on its own. Once I forgot to load anything on muh KA50, just took out the FARP with Gun only, its a lot of fun ! But also storing all targets as NAV/TGT points, setting the thing to route mode and just close in at 60kph to a FARP, just clicking NAV+waypoint+lock+launch until everything is dead is fun as well ! :D And this is the thing. Not many of us on bluefor know how to use mark points to scout an entire AO, then take it out with rapid successive weapons releases. There are a couple. I have never seen anyone do this in the KA50, even though it's capable. I'm certainly not trained enough in it to do it.

Just disregard it man. it was probably just more of me wanting restrictions applied without bias.

Saaaaaaaaab

This is a concept im ok with. The part that's unacceptable to bluefor is where we call it a time period battle to justify removal of certain weapons redfor doesn't like while not examining redfor assets that would be eliminated by the same time restrictions. When we do the latter, people show up saying "well I'm sure they were combat ready so they should be in" and other nonsense. Let's just call it what it is. Sent while I should be working instead.

Did i say something? Well, you quoted me, so, you know I did. Shrug. Sent while I should be working instead.

Also, an airfield has 5-6 osas, 3ish strelas, 3 or 4 shilkas, 2 bunkers, the white house things...leaving targets that must be destroyed up near 15 or 16. That's all assuming no Kubs are anywhere in play. If it can be done, show me how. Show all of us on blue how. I'm an average a10 pilot. Maybe above average because I understand pretty much all of its systems with a few tiny exceptions. I'm not great, I'm above average, but I challenge you to close an airfield in one alone. We'd all love to see it. Sent while I should be working instead.

For starters, ill suggest you review our available loadouts. We're not allowed cbu 105s. If you take away the tgp, you take away gbu 38s and 12s. leaving us ccip bombing with mk 82s...and rockets. If you can single handedly close an airbase with that, please instruct me, oh god of the a10. Sent while I should be working instead.

Enduro, cite some sources and I'll say "I stand corrected" As I said previously, I like the ka50. I fly it. I'd miss it if it was gone (I do as bluefor). It's more an indictment of the "80's only" feasibility with the platforms we have available. Sent while I should be working instead.

I could say the same about your ka50 story. "Oh, it wasn't in service but it could have been" I see you're an expert in "want your cake and eat it too" Sent while I should be working instead.

No. Do you read the briefings at all man? All of this info is available. Quit making posts demanding stuff of multiple servers and go read the briefings. It will take 5 minutes and eliminate posts like this one that have already been answered. Sent while I should be working instead.

Forgive me if I don't consider your scoreboard the comprehensive accepted standard. Shrug. A single su25t carries enough ordnance to finish off an entire airfield while a single a10 cannot. That's asymmetric balance too then, isn't it? Sent while I should be working instead.

Here we see an amraam shooting down a target in 1982. So...if you're gonna start manipulating the criteria for red, allow me to retort. Sent while I should be working instead.

Cite me some sources and I'll consider the point. I looked for several. But now we're starting to conveniently manipulate the criteria. Prototypes and test beds and versions. Sent while I should be working instead.

The fact is, we're playing a video game. The primary purpose is fun. A stacked losing battle and guaranteed defeat isnt fun. If its not fun, people won't play. If people don't play, whats the point? Sent while I should be working instead.