Jump to content

SignorMagnifico

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    204

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Answers

1

See answers

1 Follower

About SignorMagnifico

  • Birthday April 26

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World
    Rise of Flight
    Battle of Stalingrad

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. SignorMagnifico started following AGM-45 Shrike Quick Guide by Klarsnow - updated June 5th 2024 , Integrity check , Aerodrome Data and Frequencies - Updated 23 February 2025 and 7 others
  2. SignorMagnifico
    The intake fan turbines inside the engine scoops do not spin when the engine is starting up or running. They are fixed in place. I'm pretty sure they should be spinning if the engine is on. Happens in all maps/scenarios where the F-4 is present with the engine on. I didn't test AI. I only tested my own aircraft. DCS 2.9.8.1214
  3. SignorMagnifico
    Update: After today's patch, the performance in-cockpit is still pretty bad. FPS in the high 50's for me in the cockpit. In external view, I'm getting 100+. Tried lowering the "in cockpit displays" option to the lowest resolution (512), and that made no difference. I would try the optimised textures discussed in this thread, but that would break IC, unfortunately. Did anyone notice improvements? Seemed the same to me.
  4. SignorMagnifico
    Thank you, BIGNEWY.
  5. SignorMagnifico
    This whole situation sucks for the customer. Companies fight, and the consumer pays the price in the end. Having to wait years for the Strike Eagle to be finished with all the promised early access features is not exactly what I expected when I got it last year. I figured by now we’d have the AGM-130 and Datalink.
  6. SignorMagnifico
    Hello! I see that there have been multiple pings sent to @BIGNEWY and @NineLine. Could either of you kindly please provide a response or alert the dev team? There are some VERY good points in this thread regarding VRAM usage and optimization. Also, I find it sad that the end user has to compress the textures down with a powershell script to get any reasonable performance back while simultaneously breaking integrity check. We shouldn’t have to do the developer’s job for them.
  7. SignorMagnifico
    Not sure if it's related, but I experienced a CTD after removing a waypoint on my route. dcs.log
  8. SignorMagnifico
    On the Camp Bastion startup instant action mission, I can get about 130FPS in external view. The second I go into the cockpit, my FPS drops into the 40s. DxDiag.txt dcs.log
  9. SignorMagnifico
    Any insight from the devs on this? Should I attach more track files?
  10. SignorMagnifico
    Attaching my DCS.log, dxdiag, some screenshots, and a track file. FPS went from 80 down to 45/46 just by looking from right to left in the Chinook on the ground. DCS Performance.rar
  11. SignorMagnifico
    Thank you for making this right! Although, this was an unnecessary roller coaster.
  12. SignorMagnifico
    Yes, I’m aware of the unofficial word. Or expect any resolution at all. Can’t get to a resolution with no dialogue.
  13. SignorMagnifico
    Four months and still no update, resolution, or new official announcements.
  14. SignorMagnifico
    Yep. I feel the same way. I don’t see growing pains. I hear a death rattle.
  15. SignorMagnifico
    I agree with you. I don’t think Ugra has the right to change their minds a year after the fact. The map was already approved like it was. Ugra, ED, and OnReTech knew about the overlap from DAY ONE. They don’t have the right to bully another third party. OnReTech should have run to ED right away. These disputes SHOULD go through ED and not between the third parties. I also don’t think OnReTech has the right to remove features customers already paid for. This is a violation of the agreement they had with paying customers who already bought the map. Imagine if Hellfires get removed from the Kiowa because another dev has a module that shoots Hellfires and doesn’t like it.
  16. SignorMagnifico
    I’m starting to see the picture that it was Ugra who demanded OnReTech to remove parts of the Sinai map people already paid for. Sorry, Ugra, but you don’t just get to change your mind after a year. BOTH of these maps are great. Please get your heads out of the sand and listen to ED’s customers. This really is not the time for third parties to be fighting with each other.
×
×
  • Create New...