cypc

Dassault didn't help RAZBAM for the Mirage, didn't prevent them from making it a very accurate module. I'm confident F-15E will append when ground radar and multicrew will be fully working, just give it a couple of years :)

Partial list of RAZBAM's comments and announcements about the M2000-C : Official update news thread by Zeus About M2000-C updates : About M2000-C flight model updates : About M2000-C model: About M2000-C sounds : About M2000-5 : Would be a full module, and won't happend in the near futur because not enough informations available. Feel free to point me towards any other relevant post, hopefully this thread will avoid some questions being asked over and over. (Also if someone knows a way to have the date of the quote automatically displayed, I'd take it)

Does it mean we will always have 10 "V"s on the HUD ?

That's why I also proposed the MH-60K from the 90s, more documentation should be available and it is still glass cockpit.

MH-60K/M please, glass cockpit, in flight refueling, terrain following radar, handsome ... Blackhawk has to be at least glass cockpit to bring something really new to DCS, HH-60G is a little bit too old.

Is your INS ON ? If so, is it aligned properly or is it on deg mode ?

Went through my 350 DCS screenshots, here are my best Mirage shots. (Vanilla DCS, no edit, all from trainings or missions of my squadron) Full 23 pic selection Original quality download

The mirage is not abandoned, you should stop your nonsense. A module is not abandoned just because it is not patched monthly, you should check how often the Gazelle or the Viggen are updated ... Things in DCS take time to make / fix, there are people who respect that and the others ...

How would retracted souris at mach speed affect the plane ? Anything comparable to the concord, as explained on this interview ?

The original story here, slightly more detailed : http://oppositelock.kinja.com/favorite-sr-71-story-1079127041

Well ED has the hand on the first loading time, which they could maybe optimize a bit, I remember it was much faster few patches ago (till the loading bar got removed). Anyway, if you have a SSD, it really helps.

When you launch DCS, it loads a lot of things in RAM from you disk. When you leave DCS, these things are not unloaded, but tagged as removable so if windows need this RAM space for something else, it will overwrite what was used by DCS. So if you close DCS and relaunch it, all these things still in RAM won't have to be loaded from disk again, reducing loading time.

With an E3 set up at 32k ft the only things that would not be displayed by a proper GCI set up are aircraft in their hangar, and that's certainly not used to lead an intercept ... With that gone, could be nice to have lotATC set up.

No way to do GCI anymore :(

Dump When we check "Do not mount the DDM sensor" in mission editor, magic pylons still appear with the sensor. Would be nice to get the clean pylon back and being able to check visually if DDM is mounted or not.

This video does not show the waypoint programmation ... If you want the synthetic runway in the mirage, you have to set up a landing waypoint in mission editor, last time i checked it was not possible to do it in game.

HYPE :holiday:

+1, same "issue" with all the items on the "additional properties for aircraft" tab (laser code, enforce INS alignment ...)

F-16C would only be a duplicate of the F-18 in terms of avionic and capabilities and would not add any variety in what DCS has to offer, while an F-16A would be a nice plane filling the gap between the F-5 and the F-18, and a direct opponent to the mirage (like the F-5 and Mig-21). I'd prefer a A, would make my M2000 even more interesting to fly.

One question, and some will perfectly guess the answer: What would have happened if you started this topic in the BUG SECTION ?

Progress on the harrier looks good ! Do you plan to release it in an early state like the mirage ? Also, is there any kind of time frame or estimation of release date you can communicate us yet ?

No no no no no ! :spam_laser: MH-60K Black Hawk, please ! :music_whistling: Special force version, glass cockpit, in flight refueling, terrain-following radar :gun_smilie: But probably very classified for now ...

I'm sorry DEADBEEF but if you are refering to the 2 vikhr you shot at a mirage yesterday evening (around 20h25 server time), they both missed, I just checked the track. Agree, unfortunately FC3 planes have a simplified damage model, making them more fragile than other modules. So far I've only seen FC3 pilots complaining about mirage's DM, because the mirage is the first fully modeled planed in DCS that can compete with F-15/Su-27, but it's FC3 that is not realistic, not the mirage. The arrival of the Viggen, F-14 and F-18 should settle that for good. In reality an F-15 can land with a wing missing, now try to do so in DCS ... Out of curiosity I made some quick stats about missile hits. This comes from our last 3 run on The Kaukasus Offensive.