leonsilver

Hello! I have almost the same configuration, the difference is that I have an RTX 3090Ti 24GB vga card. 64GB DDR5 RAM & i12900K CPU I have no problems in VR. Obviously you have to make compromises with this VGA in terms of graphics. What may be important is that I use the new DLSS.

local compass_pos = {0, -0.10} local weap_control_pos = {0, 0.12} --seems okay, may be a subject to change This is how it worked for me (Pimax Light, but these were also in the wrong place with HP Reverb G2) ED could really do something with this, because it's quite annoying that we, the users, have to tinker with lua files.

Interesting. I have Pimax (Crystal Light) and I have no problems with it. The lenses are perfect, the speed is fantastic (RTX3090Ti !!). I had a G2 headset before, Pimax is much better, the inscriptions and instruments are perfectly readable. I love it!

Okay. ED, please explain that you can fly A-10Cs on the Russian side, but not Su-25Ts on the American side. Why? I don't think the Russians have dozens of A-10s. Would you please remove the NATO planes from the Russian side?

This morning: - I turned on my computer - nothing was running before it (not DCS or anything else), there is no open beta anymore and there are no third-party mods either - DCS will start and "dcs waiting for another application copy to release" will appear - What is annoying is that the DCS is on a separate SSD (SAMSUNG 2TB 870 QVO SATA 3) and the system is on a separate SSD (Samsung - 980 PRO 1TB) - i9-12900K, Kingston Fury 64GB Beast RGB DDR5 5600MHz, GIGABYTE GV-N309TGAMING OC-24GD GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB GDDR6X, HP Reverb G2 and you have to wait MINUTES for this nonsense to disappear and DCS to load. And I'm so bored dear ED!

Here is an "interesting" video. Unfortunately, it is not of very good quality, but the instrument that is important to us is just visible. And what is even more surprising is what the uploader (presumably the pilot) writes at the beginning of the video: "During take-off and landing, you hardly need to use the controls, I mean the stick rudder and the pedals. There is almost no need to use the pedal, which, thanks to the fenestron, enables much more precise control." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenestron

The weapons are usable, only the Mistral is faulty, but this is not Polychop's fault. FM is a thousand times better than the old one, I really like flying with the new Gazella! But.. the FM is still WIP - don't forget that.

the autohover WIP - it's been said a thousand times. Anyway, it's not difficult to fly, you just have to get used to the new FM

The Gazella's engine is 590 HP. This is not a war horse, but a graceful gazelle

Mistral was good until the recent patch. ED messed something up in the patch (and NOT Polychop), because there was no patch for Gazella!

The interesting thing is that it worked for me after the update. I wanted to use Mistral yesterday, I turn everything on and nothing happens. WTF???

I just love the new Gazelle! At first, the new FM was a bit strange, but once you get used to it, the machine gives you an amazing experience. Thanks Polychop!

All I ask is that the flight model be as realistic as possible. If the Gazella behaves in life like it does now in DCS, then it should stay that way and only change if the current one is really not good. But don't change because we cry on the forum..

I don't know, I haven't tried it yet. But in the first post, you searched for a keybind, and it exists and can be set.

I don't use autohover. Trim, I move to the left seat and HOT3 can go. I loved the old Gazella too, but this new one is much better! And many things are even WIP!