KROLSKI

Nice job gents!

Great build! Love the f4!

Great setup you build there!

Leuk initiatief!!

I chose the British version...... Because we Europeans miss the British mainland visits to our airshows. First time seeing a RAF Harrier doing a hover was mind blowing!!! So just arrange some summer visits of AV8b's to our airshows..... just see it as an election campaign :) But seriously , all versions are welcome! !

Nice job!

Mine to, I added an extention made out of two hydraulic couplings welded together. The +/- 15 cm height softened the transition and makes it feel a whole lot more precise.

A lot of mentions are beeing made about out dated aircraft and such. The biggest issue developing modern aircraft is the data available that is usable and implementable right? That's why a lot of developers simply say "when we don't have the info we can't make it". Or real life manufacturers are not willing to corporate. Systems that are beeing kept under the radar (I chuckled when I wrote that down in a stealth jet post)So on and so on. Taking this in account it's kind of logical that "older" planes are beeing developed. Now aiming at the F-117, what is still classified about the plane? What I always thought still a whole lot.... Is there a chance that there will be a whole lot of guessing involved in this development? Not saying that's bad, but still. And is this maybe a sign that more developers are going to take this route for the future? Maybe it's a logical step to feed the wishes for more modern aircraft?

Did not read all the posts, but does this map maybe could double for the naval map mentioned for the f-14.....

SWEET, Leatherneck guys are champs:thumbup: Ok, does some other developer has something to tell me:music_whistling:

Seen a Viggen flight demonstration many years ago.... Best show ever, pure awesomeness! Us European plane lovers are getting so spoiled:smilewink:

"No, I love the myriad of lame trainers and far flung planes with no historical opposition" Hahaha best poll line ever :lol: And yes, a F-4 variant would be great. Still in use today, usable in different years, area's and roles.

Shure I want to go to Las Vegas

Shure the platform is a one trick pony, but come on...a Nighthawk how cool would that be!!!!! Can imagine sending a couple in before a big operation to drop a gbu-27 on sam sites and such. Combining different type of plane's, already available or future developments, for their different roles ads so much diversity in the way missions can be executed. Only adding more and more imersion to the whole experience.

As stated before, some Dutch NF-5 liveries would be sweet!

The F-104 served with the USAF from 1958 until 1969, and continued with Air National Guard units until 1975 , but what Liger Zero said, a whole lot of nations around the world used the 104 for many many years. Italy retired it from service in October 2004.... I would love a G version!

Love it, great plane in a neat looking map.

Blackburn Buccaneer Saab Viggen

Guys, thanks for the feedback!

The "Bombcat" role the F-14 was assigned at the end of her navy career is something I find interesting. The most detailed information I found overherehttp://defencyclopedia.com/2015/02/14/origins-the-story-of-the-legendary-f-14-tomcat/ What would the possibilities be for the leatherneck A/B dcs version to forfill this role. As far as I know there would be need for an air to ground radar (that seems to be in the development stage by the dcs crew. Correct me if I'm wrong on that). Also would there be need for a laser designation pod or such?

Are there any plans for additional FC3 level aircraft or maybe helicopters? It's something that maybe could be made possible by 3rd party developers.

Looks great!!

Especially two throttle mechanics.

I like it, do you have order info or a site?

Love such pictures!!