Maverick87Shaka

Fonte: ASC Discord 23/07/25 Ci sono tutta annche un'altra serie di dichiarazioni e notizie a riguardo, come la UI della gestione del cargo, mostrata in esclusiva in un video di HIP che vi riporto qui sotto. Link video Youtube:

This one to me I was usual to have it set in the past, like 3 or 4 years ago (not as formula just plain nuber), but we haven't used it for at least two years. This is the current production server that I'm running (adjust port on your needs) if not net then net = {} end net.use_upnp = false webgui_port = 8088 norender_fps = 60 disable_write_track = true some days ago we ware more than 20 players on a pretty populated PvE missions in one of our instance (with some other running as well), no issue at all.

Be aware using that kind of tuning, it was there since ages, and most probably nowday is not even necessary. Use formula is completely useless, in the end it's the speed in bps if I remember well. So basically 1024*1024*256 you're telling something like 270mbps You can directly type 268435456 in the file, but yeah, honestly I'm not using it anymore on all my servers

Can you provide the actual status of submitted files and/or the report number? Or since they will not keep up you've skipped completely this part? it's literally the first time that is happening on DCS core files, in the past there was just a problem of .DLL signature, mostly coming from 3rd parties. I do really hope it will not be the "normal behavior" of all new release to be honest.

I've already done as normal user, but since it's an official stable release, it's expected that the developer parts was already done, or at least in progress, instead completely ignore the problem and ask to exclude game folder from AV analysis. That's the point. https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2ab19378e1ec9f9e4e4109ac461f3c991db5cf4436e15b9fba506dc393556693/detection

It is part of the responsibility of a software house to verify a proper installation/upgrade process before an official release, and now we are talking that there is only the stable version, we are no longer talking about closed beta or anything else. This is the official server release. I can understand if the problem had been encountered on an occasional AV software used by 10 people around the world, but here we are talking about the default Windows AV, which, like it or not, is enabled by default on any system, including the server edition used by large companies. So it is an ED mistake if it was found during internal testing and ignored instead of being submitted to Microsoft to correct the false positive, and it is even more serious if no one noticed it.

To submit file on Defender Portal you must use a company account or be invited, no personal account are allowed afaik to do that. How it's supposed to be a final user responsabilities? We don't even know the contents of these files, so how can we explain to another provider what they should do? (I mean antivirus provider)

Any update on this @BIGNEWY ? It's not a minor issue, and you can't really count on all the server admins to expose themselv to threat just to be able to host your software, expecially now that you have only one release, and it's the "stable", such mistakes should be fixed with priority.

Anyone have a reliable online scan service tobe used? I found this one, not sure how well it is (just a random google search bring me there) https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/0389b16891802743ced881bf7359883d63a15cb491a342fa0fc2c6c866d5031b/detection https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2ab19378e1ec9f9e4e4109ac461f3c991db5cf4436e15b9fba506dc393556693/detection

Yeah, to be completly honest, rather then disable a defender or any other antivirus software, I would like to see a fix with a properly signed .dll and .exe files, so we'll not have false positive, or at least a report of scanned files from an independent SH.

Also my dedicated server instance fail to start after update. When try to do reapir I've this error:

Fonte ASC Discord

Fonte: ASC Official Discord.

Nothing spectial, the following screen is the test env, but prod is the same settings in terms of VM: CPU: Intel i5-12600H RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) Disk: 1Tb nvme