Mr_sukebe

My thread includes comments about how to identify bottlenecks, eg VRAM being saturated. In your case, what’s the issue?

I’ve yet to see more than low 50GBs of use in DCS, and that’s whilst in VR, running a number of other Apps such as Simshaker, Tacview. So right now, more is probably overkill. If you don’t have an infinite budget, it’s probably more important to get a good CPU (9800x3d), PCI Gen5 drive, low latency RAM, a good GPU and then spend some time to optimise settings. Having said that, if I were planning a new build, I’d certainly consider grabbing 128GB, “just in case”.

I did think that “throttle” was usually an axis option in multi-engine aircraft? By that, I mean a single axis, against “throttle left” and “throttle right”.

Please take a scan here:

IMO, a pair of Rayban Aviator's should be an option and bindable control for all pilots in DCS.

Does it skip under high G turns? As for CD players, Sony launched the first one back in 1982. The first Discman was in 1984

My thanks for fixing a number of the above. Whilst out this evening, I spotted the following missing/not working: I was unable to bind any HOTAS/controller button to the Show Pilot Body The binding for the Rocket Panel cover didn't work for me I couldn't see binds for the Rocket panel control switches The right panel has 6 switches covering the various external lights (e.g. tail, wing, formation). I bound those to one of my panels and none of them worked The binds for the Defrost and Pitot head didn't work with my panels The binds for the drop tanks (e.g. lock, drop) didn't work with my panels

Could you tell us what action was taken?

Maybe this should be date restricted as Auto-reverse Walkmans didn’t arrive until 1982

My thoughts and hope on this is: - I’m not expecting Razbam back - I’m hoping that the initial agreement between Raz and ED was purely about the argument over payment to Razbam and the potential issue about intellectual property - if the above is true, that it might still leave the Harrier, M2000, Mig19 and F15e modules as IP property owned by Razbam. If so, then may be Raz could sell the IP/source code to ED or another 3rd party, who could then take on responsibility to maintain and also the opportunity to start selling them again. Being realistic, I’d be a bit skeptical of the sales potential for the first 3 of the modules that I mentioned, despite owning and liking them all. However, I’d happily buy the F15E again, and for a developer who fancies getting into DCS, it might be a good way to open some doors.

For the axes, have you tried recalibration of them using the Moza software? That worked for my Alpha Prime.

To add, I was just reading how when Galland was asking for more fighters with the expectation of increasing bomber group sizes, that funding instead went to “terror” weapons like the V1 and V2 and how Hitler was still insistent on building bombers to strike back at the UK.

Has anyone retested the speed of the Corsair? From the update notes I see that the RPM overspeed issue has been resolved, whilst drag has reduced. At 2700rpm, how’s the speed looking against the charts? Sorry, away from my PC for a few days, so can’t test myself

No, that still doesn’t work. There was a reason that the Luftwaffe waited close to the German border before engaging the bombers, ie to avoid the shorter range allied fighters. If a bunch of 190s had gone in at altitude over the channel, there would have been time to get a shed load of Spitfires up to meet them. The nuisance raids were effective because they went in at very low level, so as to avoid radar, giving little time to respond. The only vague would be to go in at low level, then try to max climb to 25,000 feet to intercept, putting the initiative height advantage firmly with the allied screen of fighters. That might have distracted some of the screen, but not all, and the 190s would probably have been cut to ribbons. You really think that any of the above options sound sensible?

My logic for expecting higher losses are: - Longer flight durations just to get to and from the combat zone, which burns fuel the Luftwaffe didn’t have and adds wear to engines - Fighters sent to England would be intercepted by not just the long range fighters, but most probably the hone defence fighter groups, which if anything would be more dangerous than coming across a bunch of P51s, as we know all too well that the Spitfire was a better dogfighter - if you get shot down or have a mechanical failure over England or the Channel, you don’t get to bail out and take a taxi back to base. Instead you get escorted to Canada to a POW camp or maybe get picked up by air sea rescue