wilbur81

Indeed.

Pure nonsense...

It would be nice to have the clear tint option in order to keep the JHMCS but not have to play with the gamma settings.

Are you serious? And you can't find any use for Iraq, Afghanistan, Caucasus, Persian Gulf, etc.? And you'll just jettison the Balkans? No modern air combat for you, I guess...

Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18 by Orr Kelly

Thanks for the update, Team! We'll continue to (mostly) patiently wait for that "Buggy, Erratic TWS/Radar Behavior" Hornet series of bugs to make it in.

Great find and nice reporting.

same...

There is no question, for me especially, that DCS is painfully lacking in the Dynamic Campaign/immersion arena. But it will come. I'm just pointing out that it is a taller order (within the extremely diverse DCS ecosystem) than a lot of folks give it credit. BMS had almost nothing to do by comparison... but it did that feature extremely well, no doubt about it.

The radar is still pretty heavily screwed, even after the most recent update. 3rdErraticTWS.trk

This thread doesn't need to be any longer than one single post...my original post. I'm not inviting discussion, I'm planting a flag.

That's fine. You'll find it in your YT algorithm eventually.

After Enigma's (insightful at times) "leaked" video last week: I'd just like to say, DCS still has no rival. It will NEVER be bug free (it is WAY too complex and comprehensive), never. Most of the negative comments about DCS underneath his video are absurd to me. The constant comparison to BMS is mind-boggling. If DCS was an F-22, BMS is a Cessna 152 by comparison. The Dynamic Campaign is really very cool, but you're talking about a platform that had one archaic map and one aircraft. Try pulling that off with 50+ high fidelity aircraft, dozens of different maps, with exceptionally high graphic standards, controllable ground vehicles, and wildly compl....oh, wait. ED is ACTUALLY trying to do just that! My only real criticism has been that they've spread themselves WAY TOO THIN! But I do not fault them for being ambitious. Have they blundered some 3rd party business? Yes, it is impossible to be a business for decades and not burn a bridge now and again. Can they reconcile those differences? Of course. At the end of the day, DCS is the only air combat simulator right now that is cutting/bleeding edge in my book. Period. Dot. Keep up the good work, team.

Anyone checked after today's patch to see if this was addressed?

Here's a second (shorter) example track illustrating the problem(s)... 2ndErraticTWS.trk