Кош

Мне более серьезным кажется отсутствие тяжелого истребителя у красной стороны аж до Су-27. Можно сколько угодно обсуждать ЛТХ но когда в тебя летят семерки или тем более фениксы - ну вы поняли. Дыру мог бы заткнуть какой-нибудь МиГ Е-8 если присобачить к нему Р-8 например. Но вышла эпопея с изменяемой стреловидностью, провал с СВВП и ожидание допплеровского сапфира. Воистину, иногда проще - лучше.

Appreciate the balance in the voice acting! Thanks! As for NDBs, are they affected by distance and terrain? AFAIK its a standart DCS engine feature since first Black Shark. Asking beacuse we can get a bearing on a distand another airfield's NDB while parked on the ground, but we cant do that in L-39 until taking off and gaining some altitude for example.

Thats more about PVO homeland defence. VVS airforce had more advanced navigation instead of automated GCI, and were more independent and pilot-centric. MiG-21 we currently have is a VVS one. A common technique based on BRA callouts is having a map with drawn vector coordinates and drawing the enemy taskforce flightpath with a pen on your map on your lap. And plan a "?"-shape maneuver accordingly by yourself. Common by western Mirage operators too.

Appreciate how scan bar literally paints the ground return with its pass. Now to make it paint contacts in this way(contacts now lag, but with some kind of their own logic of lag separate from the ground clutter. WIP or feature?) and it would look ready! Good job! Another question: should output fade until the next sweep or still be present?

Its travel is extremely short for the mig, think about an extension. :(

What stick do you use?

AN/ASG-14 получше чем ЦД-30. Отставание было, и к сожалению больше по управленческим причинам.

По маневренности: а чего вы хотели от дельты? С двигателем нормально все, заглохнуть надо еще суметь. Радар по дальности чуть лучше(процентов на 10) чем в реале. Убийственная проблема модуля - прицел практически не реализован. Неподвижная сетка отмасштабирована неточно, подвижная сетка не работает ни в автоматическом ни в ручном режиме. Стрелять по ВЦ приходится по трассерам. Ну и своя кухня с навигацией, частично лечащаяся модами.

No problems for me if it will be later and at a bigger price if it will meet the real life books. Take all the time it needs guys.

Looking forward to see airfield pattern using NDB.

There is sense in a trainer only if you are going to go through a real flight school training course. Maybe you can even join a squad that practices that, like https://www.avialetuchka.ru Kursant campaign is a good insight into real world military aviation, with timing, patterns and public safety first.

Maybe its DCS "Use helmet" option? If not I think it can be tuned without much problems.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=227482&page=7 for example. Hope it will be finished. And we have community Skyhawk now! With middle east map in the making I see a good ecosystem for the MiG-23. Hope for Angola someday.

So, what radar is planned? H003 or H008?

We were demonstrated an undone representation. Simultaneously it was explicitly stated in newsletter this will be released this damned month as final. What the hell is not clear?

The pit is steadily becoming alive. Good Work!

Its a bit of stretch because soviet and chinese pylons need some modification to accept actual sidewinders. The aicraft on the picture is twice non-vanilla being a Pakistani field mod of a Chinese version. So maybe as an aircraft system option(like civilian options on DCS Mi-8 and L-39 for example), not just a loadout.

Awesome! :thumbup: ED PR forced the public into opinion that what we saw as a placeholder was final implementation. Thats why "WIP" or "this is subject to change" somewhere on devs own videos description would eliminate all misunderstanding.

As it is misaligned from the start, hope that will help to give ASP the long deserved working status.

Whad does this mean? :huh:

Very nice conveying the thickness of front armor glass :thumbup: And those bakelite and ebonite!

And general continuous output of information on the screen instead of update with each new sweep. Best wishes guys, hope you'll succeed.

Looks like a misunderstanding between ED and Razbam or something. It was stated that the MiG wil be released this month as a final product(read no further improvement, what you see in the video is final). That scared many people me including.

MiG-21, F/A-18C, Skyhawk have plausible radars. Nobody said "Hey guys we have a picture of the ground as a placeholder, but procedural clutter is inbound", so you have the comments. With MiG-23 I expect it to demand the user to tune it to engagement geometry and ECM situation(at least to the level of MiG-21) to see the target. I expect to use real manual and see the sim behaving somehow related to it.

I am a game developer myself and I know how much effort does such software cost. Nevertheless there are certain definitions of done for a certain product niche. What is inconstructive with criticizing a critical system which is clearly and obviously not done yet, while it is stated that the release is scheduled this month and its going to be final, which leads to zero chance at a RP-5 simulation which is first gen tech, and the guys are sharping their teeth at a 3+ gen with Tomcat level of complexity. I don't want anyone hurt, I want people to achieve what they should and be proud of themselves. So: Pretty please, dear devs, make a plausible radar simulation with a plausible depiction of its indication. Thank you in advance!