Кош

http://www.avialogs.com/index.php/en/aircraft/ussr/mikoyangurevitch/mig-21/mig-21bis-pilot-s-flight-operating-instructions.html page 60 and on. Read for yourself guys.

It should not lock on anything. Still it must move into calculated impact point position, using radar distance and to locked target and user-dialed target size for air; radar distance, barometric altitude and pre-set target area altitude above sea level for ground impact point. Which it never did in the module for Air-Air, and ceased to do for Air-Ground. Real manual sight preflight check which cannot be passed in DCS: https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/file_download.php?file_id=472&type=bug Edit: Mig-19's ASP-5 had a second display for a second piper that locks onto target, so you have to put the impact point symbol on the target symbol like in a 4th gen fighter, they just had to make a separate display for each symbol back then. For MiG-21 they dropped the idea of cumbersome 2 displays and decided to leave visually invisible targets to guided missiles.

Same here, no gun sounds, external engine is like either from afar or in really good ear protection, and I'm not sure but anyone notice any changes with cockpit switches?

Uh oh... What surprises me is your "hopefully" :) Is there any problem providing your fixes to ED?

I use only cold and dark mission start. Never use autostart. The real world procedure to check the sight before starting the engine. The sight is obviously receiving power as wingspan, range, ballistic knob scales illuminate. But fixed net and piper don't appear until engine is started which is wrong and strange as engine doesn't support the ASP with anything the ground power and onboard inverters can not. Oh, and if I turn the engine on after all that, the sight scales appear on the reflector without touching anything sight or generally avionics related. Like projector has a separate power line than the sight in general, and that power line goes straight to the generator only.

Start cold and dark, connect external power, set up everything with engine still of and gunsight started working? In my case it only illuminates its scales, but the piper is absent, so as fixed net.

https://leatherneck-sim.mantishub.io/view.php?id=889 Reported.

At first I was skeptic, but the sheer amount of progress in the last months is resembling an avalanche. Outstanding work!

Сын родился, дай выдохну немного. Пока завел про питание АСП, и неработающие лампы обрамляющие индикатор РЛС.

:cry::worthy:oh please let it be ASP and radarscope lamps!

Значит надо смотреть сопротивление и скороподъемность, я так думаю. Вес при замерах точно как указано? ЧР? Где-то тут были жалобы что плохо разгоняется в пикировании - это может быть хинт на баг.

Да, собираюсь построить и завести баги в багтрекере. Еще хочется как-то проверить все ли хорошо с лобовым сопротивлением безотносительно тяги двигателя. И где вы все берёте русскоязычное РЛЭ на бис? У меня только синее арабское.

Пока предварительно. Атмосфера +15С 760мм. Без подвесок, заправка 1300л, бесконечное топливо. ЧР включен. У земли. М=0.7. Макс установившийся вираж получается при УУА=20, n=5. При достижении УУА=28 вираж неустановившийся, n=7(должно быть 8 по графику). 8g набирается начиная с М=0.8. Надо смотреть недостаток ли это тяги или подъемной силы планера.

The saddest part is that art side of your projects deserve undisputed praise. But you guys get all the stones thrown into code! Seriously, important things are misimplmented since project start, other things get broken with time and only art fixes or improvements commence. It looks like you need to hire a coder. Im sorry, my chair is burning. I love the 21, bought it on the first week of selling. Just want it to get into shape under the hood. And buy a real papers corresponding Crusader afterwards.

Its all fun and all, but will it be unsupported eternal beta abandonware like MiG-21bis?

:thumbup: Благодарю!!! Вот это разговор!

Серьезно ? :mad::mad::mad: Кто написал что ему "не хватает тяги"??? Откуда ты знаешь хватает или наоборот слишком много??? Как определил?

Сколько g или градусов/сек он не дотягивает до графика установившегося виража без форсажа/с форсажем?

Its not hard to code a variometer. Getting the engine gas and thermodynamics into its envelope is. As for systems - scratchbuilt TV and laser, Orbita-20 computer, SEAD container, KN-23 waypoint navigation and more are not present in the 23MLA.

Absolutely no sense in flyable big civilian birds for obvious reasons, still some AI airliners for peacetime and local conflict/coin scenarios(especially Nevada) are much welcome.(and we already have Yak-40 and An-26, add An-24 and Tu-154 and Caucasus traffic would be complete. Add 737 and any traffic would be complete :)) ).

Thanks! Just perfect.

No way, 27 is a different airframe(take the fixed air intakes instead of ramped ones alone), totally different equipment. Its like Hornet and Superhornet, or Mi-8 and Mi-24. Nevertheless, would buy both 23 and 27, especially K(the night precision strike), at full price. But then we need 80's Afghanistan.

:cheer3nc: Thanks!

Glad that 23 is still flying, a magnificent piece of engineering. Still that ТЭЧ needs a working compressor:) Mileage may vary :D

The bird in the photo is decades old, a museum relic, painted with a brush. While some people would like a historic tour and pretend its 1958. I am nowhere near asking for anything, its your artistic expression after all. Just conveying my preference, don't mean to offend, besides I'm a game developer too. Closing the thrashed aircraft topic for myself.