Кош

Those 57mm were initially designed as air-to-air weapon.

The moment at 15min 36 sec, right? Also, when the F-5 was hit, the piper was dancing way below the impact point, while this was commented as "radar assisted". And whats the difference of depicted "radar assisted" to the mode when two reflectors show artifical horizon, tracked target outline and impact point?

Yep, and ground return seems fixed, unlike simulations in Mig-21bis and community Skyhawk. This needs a comment from the devs. Also, did anyone find a video of a working RP-5 or its Chinese derivatives?

Команда МиГ-19 и МиГ-23 новая, вошедшая в состав Разбама и не имеет отношения к предыдущим проектам. Так что ожидать можно чего угодно, от Белсимтека до ВЕАО.

Ok, its subjective. Some people like it some not.

- Overdone so harder to understand English if you're not a native speaker. - A little offensive for a Russian speaker.

Two questions: - Whats going on with the piper just before the merge? What does this jiggling mean? - The radar seems to update the contact position constantly on its scope, instead of updating with each sweep so it looks like a digital 4th gen with extrapolation. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Can I hope for a pure Russian VO? On a constructive note: would be glad to see real thing manual citation and proof it corresponds to it.(For example: today we will execute start checklist from flight manual page x through y, paragraphs z, n, i are not applicable to the game, Manual says engine spoolup time should be ... now we'll see and so on) Thanks.

Thats bug splashes on the photo, they are wiped after flight.

Around a year ago there was a task on the bugtracker about making the ASP being able to go through the preflight check list which is a good start to put it into being usable for A-A gunnery(ASP working on the ground or something like that), marked with Feature status. It was never resolved and now its simply gone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WL3_joPbi8 https://youtu.be/gNPXkmJFFd4 THOSE voices and attitude...

That would be fine with me.

For a device from the era when they wore fedoras and smoked on airliners? Come on :megalol: Its a time machine, who would want a chav Spitfire?

Please keep it serious. Not that russian speakers are much offended by this, its just dumbs down the mood. There are games made exclusively for cheeki and breeki.

Pics, videos and liveries are all pretty and all, but may we see some charts comparisons of flight model with flight manual? Acceleration, climb rate, G, endurance and so on? Another topic - please make videos of ARK assisted airfield circuit with real manual citation, and radar-assisted gunnery with real manual citation. Thank you.

Или заменили модели 30 метровых деревьев на модели действительно 30 метровых деревьев а не рескейл 5 метровых деревьев как сейчас.

200 hits on target? maybe 10-20. Don't expect anything lifelike from a lifebar damage model. To see more true-to-life results we need not only armor penetration model but systems modeling too. Once in SABOW my T-62 had 6 penetrations from M-60 hits but none of them damaged any system or crew member. And then I got burned from an RKG hand grenade to the engine air intake.

Check your pneumo brakes pressure on final, be sure you are not braking. Actually no problem with overspeed and overweight. Just wait for 1-2 sec on 1m altitude before touchdown.

Still waiting for dirt strip and highway farp missions. MiG-29 can operate from a 500m of a highway. MiG-21 can operate from short dirt strip with RATO.

Two dumb rocket pods. 4 Yaks may go as a single Su-25. Cool. Compare with, say, MiG-27K - supersonic all weather night precision strike.

As a bot - maybe. Flyable - hell no. Its a useless coffin.

The "Psychological turquoise" was invented a little later. Early MiG-21 like F-13 and PF had black pits. Damn, our school workshop and all the machining there were turquoise. And a good half of labs in the university...

Жаль, с Эрихом Брюнотте было круто.

Чиж, а будет кино о визите к эксплуатантам?

Деревья явно апскейлены. То есть проблема не в их размерах а в том что для изображения 25 метрового дерева используется отмасштабленное 7 метровое дерево. Поскольку мы всю жизнь каждый день видим деревья и то что с размером и возрастом структура изменяется, эти 25 метровые деревья хочется воспринимать как намного меньшие, мозг ломается :noexpression: Нарушается чувство скорости и высоты. Ну и в городах хорошо бы их меньшими сделать так точно. А то дубы с 16 этажку на каждом шагу. Если пострадает густота - в городах не страшно.