Jump to content

do_ob

Members
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by do_ob

  1. Keep in Mind its early access, things tend NOT to work as intended first few decades after a module release.
  2. Resolved. Thanks!
  3. Would like to see the minigun controls be somewhat similar to the Mi-8 gunner slot, where you have your trackIR or VR HMD controlling your view point and a mouse or any other axis inputs controlling the gun aim point :joystick: Plus, would like to see the view point behind the gun sight , not in front of it. Make the EOTech actually usable as a gun sight when in the door gunner position. PLEWWWWEEEESSS!
  4. I know about the hotkeys, but the steps are still to fine, most Russian radios R-800, R-862 and so on (Mig-29's, Su-27/33, Mig-21), have a step of 0.25 as the minimum. That's good to hear! :thumbup: We did turn them on, and yet it still mostly sounds like talking in temaspeak. Hmm, we must have missed that, I'll tell them to turn it off and try again. Thanks! I'll ask him to send in logs. He just said that as soon as SRS was on his axis start to jump around and its impossible to fly formation. As soon as he turns of SRS, everything goes back to normal. But we also think it might be something with the latest DCS patch since this was happening on 2.5 beta. And even people without SRS installed were saying that controls were acting funny. Anyway I'll send logs as soon as possible. Thanks for this super nice program man!
  5. We tried your SRS, and a lot of our team was quite sad. - The R-8XX series radios do not change by 0.001, the minimum step is 0.25 - The fact that distance only affects volume, it should just apply distortion and not make the voice quiet. - Due to difference of input devices of real AC's and our headphones, SRS needs a filter that would cut out high frequencies. Real radio transitions sound a lot more dampened. Plus some problems - 2 people had problems with SRS not seeing any input devices, even keyboards and mice. 1 person had problem with SRS interfering with his HOTAS axis somehow. SRS is a great tool, but definitely needs more work. Btw, this is not criticism, just reporting some stuff.
  6. :joystick:
  7. This was discussed somewhere a while ago, when it appeared on the Eagles HUD. It turned out that in reality most fighters have this smudge when the HUD is to bright (ass it is set to max brightness in DCS by default, unless you change it). So there's nothing special about this.
  8. Center smoke is not on a pilon, it is integrated in to the engine. It will turn on or off only at speeds higher than 300 or 350 km/h. The smoke pods that go on the outer pilons of the wing can be manipulated freely.
  9. The way the trimmer is modeled in the 27 and 33 is way way off from the real thing. It is especially noticeable on a FFB stick. And even with a regular gimbal some things just stand out as wrong. So. . . a FFB stick can't trimm as far as a regular gimbal? Why? Every other aircraft in DCS behaves fairly good and realistic when it comes to trimming. But the Su-27 and 33? Hell no. Here is a comparison. The FFB trimm can't even reach 3° While a regular gimbal exceeds 7° Also if you look closely how the stick is missaligned with the trimmer on the FFB, and how the stick is moved beyond the trimmer range on the regular gimbal. Movement of the stick full motion by the trimmer is not how it works in reality.
  10. Did a retexture for the in cockpit pilot body, and wanted this mod as an adition, to make everything look as good as it can. So this mod works for me. . . somewhat. Basically works in cockpit view, positions and resizes. All good, except the fact it doesn't show any charts. Tried every folder and it still gives me nothing. Same results in all 3 - 1.5, 1.5B and 2.0A Any help on why this is?
  11. Вот насчёт быстрых видов и инерционых трекеров. . . если человек покупает такой джой (Оди из самых дорогих если брать Ганфайтер с штоком + МЦГ), думаю что этот человек может себе позволить и на нормальный трекер потратиться. :huh:
  12. Преимушества аналога в том что присутствует амплетуда от 0 до 100 и ВСЁ что в промежутке, у обычной кнопки ИЛИ 0, ИЛИ 100. Соответственно, это облегчает целеуказание и наведение. Две хатки там как и на оригинале - А то что нет клика. . . ну как бэ на реальных палках его тоже нету. . .
  13. Шток Ганфайтера 20см. В современых Сушках "на глаз" он примерно 10см. Но при всём этом, можно высверлить клёпки из штока ВКБ, взять крепяжи и впеньдюрить их в собственую трубку любой длинны. Главное если вдруг взбрендиться по длинее, то не забывать про длину проводов. А так да, можно вполне самому 10см трубку заклепать.
  14. Аналог или дигитал - означает что хатки могут работать как Оси (Аналог) или как кнопки (Дигитал) в зависимости от предпочтения пользователя. Я так понимаю что в ВКБ софте это всё предусмотрено и легко настаевается. А нажатие подразумевает что по мимо того что хатка ходит в 4 стороны, её ещё можно "Вжат" в центре, что даёт доп кнопку.
  15. В данный момент есть Кобра М5 Версия3. Думаю от него взять датчики, насчёт самих кнопок я думал запустить через Ардуино плату. Кит для самостоятельной сборки устроит т.к. в планах заменить и механику на БРД. Я вам напишу в конце января - в начале февраля и там договоримся. :smilewink:
  16. Интерес есть. Если можно узнать во сколько обойдётся рукоять Су-17/24 с полным набором кнопок, и возметесь ли вы собрать такой для меня?
×
×
  • Create New...