Jump to content

pagadi-zaiet

Members
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pagadi-zaiet

  1. ...with this patch no betterment for VR, visuals or FPS...very disappointing!
  2. yes...how?
  3. I say 20/25% less frames with deferred and also less clarity in visuals!
  4. Are the developers working with Nvidia for an optimised driver for DCS?
  5. https://www.vrheads.com/can-i-use-both-graphics-cards-vr
  6. Days of monitors are coming close to an end... not just my opinion. VR is the future, we need 90+ and stable. What happen to Vulcan implementation? What is the current status? Can you find out please?
  7. ...no betterment here either :-(
  8. All traffic, including trains and also chimney smoke is broke in the recent update to 2.5.2!
  9. ...prop effect not visible in VR for Bf 109 !
  10. When we are actually going to see some progress in VR performance to include better AA and FPS ?
  11. Spot on points. I do have an Asus 34 inch monitor but it`s very hard going back that route. Let`s hope for fixes soon and above all a bit more information and reassurance the problems are addressed!
  12. Frustrating times as better hardware (as in new graphics cards) is not available also...so we pretty much stuck with my 1080Ti. With quite low res in current VR headsets we certainly need some form of AA. Problem with deferred is that looks like it might be difficult if not impossible to implement. At least we should be keep posted in this regard! I certainly hope for a fix and I will also hold further purchases for now. How about some news re Vulcan implementation which was promised months ago??
  13. Can we have a clear pathway of what the company will do to improve or at least get VR performance back on track?. Some of us invested good money in this sim and think is fair that we should be informed on some steps and time scale that will be taken for the fix of now poor performance and visuals in VR!
  14. Very good post and it depicts exactly the current situation...very disappointing indeed!
  15. ...please let us know how you managed this to work. I am on a 1080Ti and any AA in CP has no effect what so ever!
  16. The experience in VR is not great for me as well in 2.5...the least to say! I am on a 1080ti and 7700 oc at 5GHz. Performance is poor, frames are low and visuals appear to be blurred with the new deferred shading. There is promise for betterment with Vulcan implementation but who knows when that will materialise. AA is a No-No as with deferred it really affects the performance. We all looking forward for some substantial patch to give us some betterment.
  17. The results without DS on my 1080TI are way better as well...however the trees look terrible and the general look of the ground objects is washed out! DS is not the way forward for VR, this is for sure as performance is poor. We need better frames and need Vulcan implementation soon...I will certainly put on hold any more module purchases until I can see some betterment. Sorry but I cannot fly on my monitor...not anymore!!:-)
  18. stitters...LOL...love it!
  19. Wonder if Single Pass VR technique is already implemented in DCS. Helps a great deal in other applications!
  20. ...apart from in the works for months...
  21. I will be more than happy to ditch Deferred Shading if trees will be sorted!
  22. Can the loading screen get sorted please???...it really gives me a headache in VR, particularly now with the longer loading times!
  23. ...sure it does, some people do not know what they are talking about, we need better performance, much better performance in fact!
  24. 45fps no good in VR, not in dog fight anyway, planes shake like gelo , etc
  25. Can the bad looking trees and washed out colors of ground objects be fixed? Performance without differed shading is way better and I can actually use this game, however ground textures look really bad!!
×
×
  • Create New...