Darcaem

You are completely right. I haven't use any so far because I was used to manually handle mods in my "past as a gamer"... but this will justify using it. Thank for the remainder.

That's exactly why I would like to be able to "select not to download" certain liveries. I use zbysiek's script, it has worked wonders in VR for my limited GPU's vram, and every update I need to redownload again all textures that I had optimized, so even a minor hotfix means I had to spend up to an hour, and after DCS's update I need to re-optimize the same textures again, which takes around another 20-30min Can I live with that? Absolutly. This wish suggested on this topic is by no means a life of death situation, but in my opinion (I may be wrong) is not a terrible complicated feature that could mean a quality of life upgrade for some people for different reasons. Hardware is cheaper, sure, but in my mindset this should be no reason to not optimize things and just bruteforce it. EDIT: just remembered the Spanish expression we say while refering to bruteforce things "do not kill flies with cannon shots" (no mates moscas a cañonazos) and I though it was funny

100% agree with the general topic, and with those 2 suggestions specifically. We are already able to manage what terrains and modules want to install, we might use the same manager to chose which liveries to install, besides the default livery for each core asset (or maybe even one default livery per country per asset, when appropriate).

I believe you can place a static unit wherever you want

+1 to the option of having zones with different civilian traffic settings. It could be added besides the existint setting, maybe we could create trigger zones and set a specific civilian traffic level for each zone, and on the rest of the map not covered on those trigger zones, the main setting would apply. I usually like civilian traffic on my mission, specialy on maps with highly populated areas. But then. it is kind of weird when some random car overtakes a tank column in the middle of an active warzone I'm more neutral on the pedestrians... It would be nice, totally, for less "valuable" for me

It just happened to me twice, yesterday and this morning (I haven't played since last weekend), never happened before. Just in case it can be useful I'm attaching the log from the last crash. DCS exception from antivirus is added and there is no other active session (I've check the devices tab on my DCS's webpage profile, since I did log in my account from my laptop some weeks ago) 2025-06-07 07:05:06.420 ERROR ASYNCNET (7896): The session has expired (401). Exiting... First time I was using the mission editor and happened almost inmediatelly after open it. The second one was a VR session around 10min after start. EDIT: it did happened after last update, not that I think it is related though. And today's crash was in SP dcs.log

Yep, I've just noticed that myself when I couldn't find some of my late activation groups Maybe this is part of the optimization? Denmark was totally plain and unusable anyway (at least to my liking), and not part of the map on its current phase

I've not actually hung up my good old headset yet, but I haven't dare open the F10 in a VR session in months. We are all aware of the problem, what we need is a solution (preferably other than "buy a 5090")

It could be quite fun if done properly, maybe as part of CA, for singleplayer. I don't know if for multiplayer makes sense, since there are already third party apps for GCI as far as I know (no idea, I do not do multiplayer). Allthough we would need a proper update for CA too

As a G2 user myself, this happened to me some months ago. Once you have rule out the firmware update (that fix is quite old though, you should already have installed the latest firmware) you shuold start considering it a cable problem EDIT: in my case, I ended up buying a new cable and (fingers crossed) I've never had other problem since

You have to set a valid value, (0,0) is the reference origin for the coordinates, its position depends on the map, but in general is not the center of the map. Copy these values suggested by Shimmergloom667 s

You could use the remove scenery trigger tool to remove them and place a groud instead, couldn't you? (Serious question) I haven't actually tried, I've just placed an EWR ground unit nearby jejeje I don't remember where, but I believe I read that the decision of placing so many scenery was due to performance because (it said) it has better performance as a map object instead of populating with statics Enviado desde mi SM-A346B mediante Tapatalk

Unless there were chinese weather/spy balloons... Can't they be removed with the remove map objects trigger action? (I can't test it, updating last patch right now). If not, yeah, I agree there should be a way to hide them

Ups, sorry yes, I assumed you were already using this:

I can confirm Sperenberg does work. Also, in my missions I've also used Schonefeld, Leipzig and Peenemunde channels successfully. I haven't tested any other channel yet