motoadve

Tested the Corsair no problems here, I used the chart for power settings, so then I try to to overheat it, what I found is that it can go from normal temp to overheat very quickly, and from overheat seize the motor even more quick, like a water cooled engine that lost all coolant, @-Rudel- maybe just reduce the sensitivity of how quick it overheats or seizes just a tiny bit? Corsair has a big motor , but as soon as it hits the redline for temperature it seizes almost instantly, before seizing it should hesitate a bit or loose some power. Apart from this, I think its a great module.

La7 can be flown against all the axis planes, you can add Russian lend lease A20s, Spitfires, and P47s, use the Kola and Germany maps (I know modern but you can remove objects in mission editor). I am a bit disappointed that third party planes does not have ED damage model, they have a simplified damage model, hope this changes. Some assets for PTO can also be used in ETO and be correct historically.

I hope not, DCS is meant to be high fidelity, not a gamey sim to please War Thunder mentality.

I doubt a big radial engine like this would be so fragile, seems overdone.

Civ traffic set to none Terrain shadows set to none That made a difference for me in this map I also have a 5090 and a AMD 9800X3D

Pretty disappointing is not a priority for ED

Here is looking at it from the other side, have the planes, maps, WWII assets. Creator makes Mosquito campaign saying no WII assets required, instant turn off, I don't buy the campaign, don't want to shoot at modern Russian armor. No one works for free, assets pack is high quality, and not too expensive , which can give you hundreds of hrs of enjoyment. This hobby might seem expensive but the cost divided by the amount of hrs we use it, its one of the best bang for the buck hobbies.

To me the movements look a bit jerky, unlike a plane. I fly real warbirds, aerobatics and do dogfight simulations, real life movements are smoother , with that being said , I have never tried a motion rig myself, would love to try one and hopefully like it. VR flight sim guy, I dont believe anything he says, everything is amazing awesome until the next thing comes out.

Here is an example, I have an aviation YouTube channel, posted a video with a title created by me, first day I got the usual 3000 views. Asked chat GPT to create a title for my video, then I changed and that same video blew up with thousands of views. I have tried it for other stuff and it has been a disappointment.

DCS warbirds are great IMHO, it has been the only sim that has given me some feel or realism, FFB with extension also helped, but one problem with DCS is that we always fly in calm air, there is no bumpy air or turbulence, low alt wind you can feel it but its like laminar wind, not bumpy at all. When I fly my warbird IRL and I have calm winds, it reminds me of how warbirds feel in DCS.

Are you certain about this from inside information? To me all warbirds fly great, but find them a bit forgiving, you can get away with a very slow base to final and a steep bank, plane wont stall, landing and taking off in the 109 for sure has to be easier than how it was IRL, the modelling of the 109 landing gear is going to be improved according to a newsletter a few months ago. Have not tested the new FM for the Corsair yet

Very disappointing its not a priority to fix this issue

20% I have an AMD 9800X3D and 64GB of DDR5 RAM, Can fly over Berlin, London or Paris at 90fps in VR, everything is very smooth even at low altitude. Settings are very high, great graphics but Terrain shadows off, which makes for very smooth flying at low altitude over dense forests or big cities

I bought a 5090, but sold my 4090 for a lot of money, after almost 3 years of use. The performance increase in VR is definitely noticeable, worth the upgrade.

For warbirds I think wake turbulence is spot on. I have experienced it many times in real life while chasing another warbird.