F900EX

What's useless? your post or something else?

And I would agree with you once players get of the hype train, one of my concerns is by adding more maps it separates the small % of players who play MP. As you mentioned NV would be a good example, very few servers and even less players playing on it, as I mentioned in my first post.

Just incase if anyone is wondering if I bought the Map, I did today. Thanks to my winnings in the Kentucky Derby made the chioce a lot easier :) See you in the MAP if your playing MP.

The only change is updating drivers for Nvidia. Nothing was changed in DCS I use a 1080ti, SSD, 32GB Ram etc.. All higher end computer components�

Since todays, I am either frezzing or crashing, does anyone else have the same problem?

Why not just include the F18 while you at it LOL ...

Can I get an update on the order? Status page shows it hasn't shipped yet. I ordered on the 22nd April

I would agree, but one thing the Viggen is missing is missions. Especially for what it was designed for in Sweden. �

The M2000c rockets fly like on rails and hit the target all the time once your lined up. I wish the Viggen rockets were similar.

Looks great... but the question is will it be allowed on MP Servers?

Bought the T-shirt ... thanks.

LOGIRich, I appreciate your answer and I will give your last 2 points a try but I am already using the stiffest spring (blue), but let's be honest it's not really not fixing the issue is it?, or are you saying the "play" that's in my joystick is intentionally done by logitech? I find that hard to believe since most other joysticks I have owned did't have this and when I first started using this Joystick it never had this issue either. I'm not here trying to give you a hard time, but its fustrating to have this issue since i am always correcting when a certain direction.

That's a fair reply and I respect you opinion also, I've read most of the issues and the history behind the M2000c and the Harrier and I feel for the players who have spend good money on the bases that Razbam will see the Modules from start to finish, like Vitormouraa stated above, Razbam has been amazing on "selling the dream", "Very active and good communication during the development, and from the another discussion again I think this is a very important view as mentioned by fjacobsen ... "So shortly after early access the "economic" motivation declines and it becomes more important to get the next money cow ready for early access". Personally I think this is a very good point. I might be new around DCS but I have been playing aircraft sim platforms since the Vic-20 (Flight Path 737), in my personal career I have been in Aviation for 20+ years, buying, financing aircraft. For many years when I sold corporate jets, transparency and communication are vital for a smooth transaction, my point is Prowler111 stated in the road map thread "Also, we are putting final touches to the M2000C module. Deadlines have been set" What happened to this?? All I am saying is the people having bought the module should at least be given a realistic timeline of when RazBam expect to complete the module. Bugs and issues are separate, I don't expect every minor issue to be fixed, but again players (customers) who bought the M2000c and Harrier should get what was sold/promised to them, that's where I really feel RAZBAM have been unfair here. Communication does not cost anything ... The last update I can find was in January, we are nearly in May, how come it takes so long to get an answer? there have been plenty of posts regarding this issue and not one reply from any of the RAZBAM group. They are on here on a weekly bases. I'm a fair, reasonable guy, I am very patient and I do not like being negative but it's not nice when players who have supported over all the years and now have given up because they feel what was told to them will never happen, meanwhile other modules are been promoted in the same way the M2000c was. It all goes back to what fjacobsen said above.

So your ok paying a lot of money for an incomplete module that given by Razdam's completion history on the M2000c 3+ years later with a lot of promises and assurances still is not completed. Why would it any different for the A-29b ? Maybe you need to review the below thread .... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=195798&page=45 Razbam mentioned his is roadmap thread "Also, we are putting final touches to the M2000C module" that was well over a year ago lol .. "final touches" :megalol: have you seen the outstanding bug/incomplete list in the M2000c page ?

at the very least a Geforce 1080. I have the TI version and have no complaints

I can't wait for the Viggen pilots shooting down F-18s on youtube :pilotfly:

I would agree, 2 months ago I opened up my brand new Saitek Pro Flight X-55 Rhino for DCS. Last night I noticed my M2000c which is probably one of the most stable aircraft in level flight in DCS was tilting to the left, when I put my had on the Joystick I noticed there was "slight play" in the banking from the Longitudinal axis which was causing the aircraft to slighty bank. So because of that play the aircraft will now bank slightly left or right Bottom line is the joystick will not sit center, this is only after 2months of 4-5 times a week of regular usage. I'm assuming it will only get worse over time. Now Saitek wants us to look at purchasing the X-56 lol, it's fairly obvious that Saitek knew of quality control issues with the X-55 you only need to look online and here to see plenty of customers had issues. What's Saitek got to say about this ?

It sure is, but if you take RASBAM's completion history into account you will wait years for a finished product.

I would agree, there seems to be a lot of as you mentioned partially finished modules and maps vs complete high polished modules. It's a common thing around DCS and then you wait for years if ever to be complete, the M2000c would be a very good example of this.

Yes I have reviewed the cheatsheet but i'm not talking about single player gaming, I play alot of multiplayer and what's really needed is a pre-flight planning tool for multiplayer. This will hopefully will slove the problem once its released :) https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=195724 I appreciate your help guys. :thumbup:

I can use all the weapons except this one, bascially what i'm trying to do is drop the BK 90 on either a taxiway or runaway and i'm sure your aware lately the runaway is not showing up on the radar as well as it once did. I know the Long/Lat of where I want to drop but I can't seem to find a good tutoral on YT that shows me what i'm doing wrong. Usually when I fly its without a flight plan on a MP server.

Thanks for the update...

Now all we need is the ability to select a target on the map, right now there is no way to use the BK90 on MP server ...

You only need to look at the main Razbam page to see there are plenty of people who will throw $60 for modules that are never completed and like many people here just give up and move on. I was going to buy the Harrier but I won't now, I feel bad for the players who paid full price for the M2000c and never saw what was sold to them from early release. Like fjacobsen said a few pages back ... "So shortly after early access the "economic" motivation declines and it becomes more important to get the next money cow ready for early access" That's your answer right there... Shame on Raz IMO

You are correct and yes there are threads for that but the point im trying to make it's all relevant since it's connected to the same developer with the same issues, so i'll just ask the question can someone shed some light as to why its taken 3+ years and the M2000C is still not complete yet? or more importantly what's the current timeline to make it close to completion.