supersylph

I tested the laser using the included weapons training mission and had no problems at all.

I understand that both ED and RAZBAM are trying to protect their own interests. But now that it's been a long time, no one has really stood up to show how to protect the rights of players. Ultimately, the root cause of this conflict is "money" and the uneven distribution of loot between the two sides. Where did all the money go? One of the premises for you to fight over this money is that someone pays you. And the fundamental source of this money is paid by us players. No matter how your money is divided, it has nothing to do with us players directly. Who violates the agreement and who needs to pay compensation to the other party is one thing, and giving players what they deserve is another thing. Now, just because you have a conflict, we players are going to lose everything. This is ridiculous, especially now that the players' money seems to be in the hands of ED, and ED took the money and cancelled these planes.

If there is no problem with clarity, I think what we actually lack is a richer infrared effect.

Yes. When you are searching for large aircraft such as KC135, your detectable distance is about 70 nautical miles. When you are searching for heavy fighters such as F14 15E, if the conditions are good, you can find them at about 50 nautical miles. If it is F16 18, it is about 40 nautical miles.On paper, the JF17 radar doesn't have as far a range as the F18 16. But since your missiles can't reach that far, it doesn't matter much. And within the effective range, its operation convenience and response speed are better than the F18 16.

There is no fix, and this patch is no longer valid after the update.After the update, I re-applied this patch, which resulted in no JF17 to choose after entering the game.

Yes, I understand what you are saying. So we should call on both parties to at least agree on this very minor change, RAZBAM should issue a statement agreeing to ED to make this change. And ED should also ensure that this most basic function can work properly, just like they fixed the radar. Imagine that you can't recognize the upcoming mig29 in the F15E AV8B M2KC, and any new aircraft that comes out later, this is simply intolerable. And the fact is that they can't recognize the F4E now.In this conflict between the two parties, they both claimed to protect their own interests in the future, but in this incident, the rights of a third party, namely the players, were also damaged but were rarely mentioned.

But in fact, the work of modifying RWR symbols is very simple. We should push RAZBAM and ED to reach a consensus on modifying these documents to solve this problem.

This is a big problem with DCS now, everyone’s standards are not unified.I'm sure there will be problems on other aircraft as well.But those aircraft may not have restrictions from the aircraft's own system, but through the pilot's operating specifications, but DCS's auxiliary fuel tanks do not have collisions, so even if you exceed the limit, there will be no actual impact. For example, the JF17 has a slope limit for jettisoning fuel tanks, but other aircraft in the game can jettison them at will.Also, on the JF17, if your FCS mode is set incorrectly, it will cause damage to the pylons. The same is true for the F16 on the BMS. If you set it incorrectly, it will be easily damaged. On the F16 on the DCS, you will not encounter this problem.In addition, if you are interested, you can go to the fault settings of the editor to have a look. JF17 has the largest number of configurable fault options among the three generations of machines in the game.

It was jtac, I asked him to shine the laser and smoke mark. Then the DMT lss aimed at the smoke and found it quickly.

In an update in the second half of last year

The selection of data link symbols is now A, A+G, A+S.

I found the original video and this is definitely not the B3. Looks like they have a newer version of the avionics.

This is obviously jf17b3

According to the latest news, there will be some new air defense units in the future game.Does the compatibility mentioned by ED include updating the RWR information for RAZBAM modules?

The current 400AKG has met the basic practical conditions. Can't it be updated as an Easter egg?I know it has some authenticity issues now, but similar problems exist in many DCS modules to a greater or lesser extent.For example, KH66 of mig21.It is obvious that developing a new weapon type for this model of weapon will be a low priority task for ED.Before that, I hope that the existing 400akg can be updated as a placeholder.Until someday in the future it is completely completed.Once it is officially added to the game, as a currently unique weapon, it will definitely be one of the best selling points. It will undoubtedly drive a certain amount of sales, which is a good thing for everyone.As an anti-ground weapon, it will not have any impact on PVP players.PVE players can also decide whether to disable it according to their preferences.

More than half a year has passed since the production team released the initial promotional pictures and demonstration videos last September.Although it is already in the game files, it has not been possible to use it directly.For what reason could he not be released?Does ED plan to make similar weapons himself?

F14 and F16 will take longer. They are still in early access version.Personally speaking, compared to the standards of most other DCS models, the initial version of JF17 can already leave the early access version.Half of the problems currently facing JF17 can only be solved by ED.Since ED took over the weapons, JF17's weapons have frequently had some problems.CM400AKG Missile ED is not officially updated to the available weapons.Weather radar is not found in the current DCS, until one day ED is willing to make it.

My C701 appears to meet the launch conditions, but no matter how I press the launch button, it cannot launch. 701bug.trk

There is no fire animation, no thrust. The only normal part of it now is that it can be thrown away.

In previous versions, its mouth flame effect has been problematic for a long time. Now it is completely broken. When you turn it on and take off nothing happens.

My RWR does not show aerial targets illuminated. Does anyone know what is going on?

The KH29TE is also positioned too far back. One of the two 29L models is also positioned too far back.

After SM turns on custom HUD, duplicate display content will appear.The KH-59MK is located further back on the pylon than the KH-59M, causing it to penetrate the flaps.

This option is not turned on