toni

What do you tell me about the chance to choose between several scort vessels type and its names .

Yeah, down the road the Naval version would be interesting , that is SH-70 LAMPS . But given that we will have a Forrestal class + Nimitz from ED comissioned , why dont start with the SH-3 Sea King ? Would love to see a Helo DLC made by Heatblur, but prior to that I bet for completing the naval series with birds like A-6 , S-3A , E-2C/D and in a medium future the F-18E/F SuperHornet given that Coretex Designs looks to be dead .

Simply PERFECT ! have you thought guys how will manage the water effects around your vessels ? Sea into DCS looks pretty simple to me, we need accurate wakes depending on the speed and things like that. In other words..... WET WATER .

I bet for some kind of ATC to manage traffic around the ship . Probably would be enough connecting via TS, but then a sector screen would be needed with someone watching and giving instructions . Something similar to Ivap .

No need to say we will have Pitching Deck when under bad weather + heavy seas , right ?

Guys what about the scorts , any CG or DDG insight ? Personally I would choose a Belknap class + Farragut class DDG . The Spruance would be fine also.

So, seems that the USS Forrestal CV59 will be fully modeled . Any other on the class ? The USS Saratoga CV60 would be cool .

The USS Constellation is NOT a Forrestal class CV . Said that, would be quite interesting if Heatblur shows us the sea trials at a proper time. :)

Would be interesting the old Iwo Jima LPH class you think ?

I would name a couple, Hawaii, Elmendorf AB in Alaska, Key West NAS, FL .

Perhaps will be time to start thinking on Extended Maps applying new tech . Hawaii Islands,Pearl Harbor and its associated Air Bases could be funny focusing on Carrier DLCs .

May be by when the Nimitz + Kutznetsov classes are out, we will get some kind of Navy Asset Packs in parallel development ! :)

Great ! are you going to unveal the 3th project by the end of year ? And.....what do you tell me about a future Carrier DLC itself ? Maybe a Kitty Hawk class ? good Job

Best wishes for both Teams ! Now that you have pulled apart in 2, I am wondering if someone would consider giving a significant push forward to Naval warfare development, in the way of AI content + fully dedicated DLC modules in the form of controllable ships. Thankyou and good luck again

Also would like some planning info concerning Carrier Ops DLC . Know that is on hold by now, but will that affect the LS Forrestal class , and , what about the interaction between the Hormuz theatre ?

So, now that Nimitz class is on hold I think is time to drop some lines about the mast type to be included. Can we choose between ?

So........no more dissertation ! the S-3 Viking and E-2C/D are with no doubt the proper ones .

Alongside with the Tomcat/Forrestal module, the SH-3 Sea King would be absolutely great, implementing full ASW capability with submarine inmersión megamaps . AI subs could be developed for that purpose, even though would be cool if some dedicated developer team could focuse in building a fully controllable diesel/electric submarine, maybe a Kilo class .

Talking about the Kuznetsov development DLC, will this HIGH VISIBLE TRAIL be accurately modeled ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRVhCl02ssk

Hey guys, any thoughts about the scort classes for the CV ? If we have in mind the era, mid 80s , perhaps a Belknap CG would be cool alongside with a Knox frigate or FFG7 O.H.P . Would be fantastic if you could recreate a full Carrier Battle Group anyway.

Carriers DLC Hi ED, is Carrier DLC on hold ? any clue about how long for ? Just take your time and build a great modules. Will the delay affect other dlc like the Tomcat + Forrestal LNS ? Thanks

Also submarines would be cool together on a map with underwater environment . A serious thread for any Carrier or battle group. This way potential ASW platforms can be developed , SH-2 , SH-3 , SH-70 ....... S3 , P3 .

Hi, would it be very complicated to be able to download REAL weather conditions via an online server for a given map ? Would add a plus talking about inmersión , just like Active Sky does into FSX.

A proper Naval Module development is a must I think , side by side and coexisting with the ones in progress by ED, Carrier Ops . Yes, some kind of LHD would be cool, Iwo Jima class, Tarawa or Essex . A controllable unit with some proper interiors and systems would be brilliant.

Thanx so much, will try