kaoqumba

+1

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3757074&postcount=2

Oh That's great.

Thank you! I'm ready to enjoy it!

What is the range of the AGM88 anti-radiation missile in the game? Can it reach 80 nautical miles?

It's very unlikely. As you know, the F/A18C simulated by ED and the time line of weapons and ammunition it possesses is 2005. And as far as I know. GBU54 was tested from February 2005 to September 2006. It was not until May 2007 that the purchase of GBU54 was announced.

That's exactly what I need! I'm looking forward to experiencing all this on F/A18C.

That's great! JDAM of A10C can hardly do this. Believe that F/A18C can give us a brand new JDAM

That's great! JDAM of A10C can hardly do this. Believe that F/A18C can give us a brand new JDAM

Friend, I understand your mood very much. F/A18C is many times more complex than AV8B and released later than AV8B. As a result, the development progress of F/A18C has begun to catch up with and surpass AV8B. We've been waiting too long. But now that we have purchased AV8B, we have no choice but to remain patient and wait. And in the future, you and I will no longer support any unfinished pre-experience version of Razbam.

Can Phantom 2000C also be transferred to the official version? It has no serial number. How should I operate it?

Regarding JDAM and JSOW, Wags mentioned that JDAM and JSOW are very complex systems. Does this mean that for JDAM and JSOW, there are many attack parameters we can set? Can they plan flight routes, attack angles and collision angles?

Hi! In the future, can our JSOW and JDAM plan flight routes?

Sorry, I mean the ED team will give priority to the F/A18C promised functions and weapons. Continuous addition of unplanned functions and features will greatly increase the cost and time of development.

NO，I know that in the latest news of JF17, the JF17 development team promised DTC loading. But for the F/A18C, the current focus is on fulfilling the promised functions and weapons. For the new aircraft and new functions added later. In principle, it will not affect the development of old modules. "Because other people add new functions and features, we also need to add new functions and features." This will greatly increase the time and cost of development. For example, AV8B and F/A18C have AGM65E missiles. A10C also used AGM65E, but it has not been added.

Where can I get this MOD?

CASE3, you have more time to fix the plane. Plenty of time is its advantage.

I misunderstood you. I'm sorry.

In the game, ATFLIR is more advanced than LITENING. ATFLIR allows us to have the forward-looking infrared needed for night flights and even the same hot spot tracking capabilities as AV8B. At the same time, ATFLIR does not need to occupy heavy hanging points, we can use them to mount more sub-tanks, LITENING often needs to occupy a heavy hanging point, which will reduce our external fuel consumption.

No, this does not lead to the conclusion that things are not going well. It only shows that they are complex and take more time. We can't have them in a short time, and we need to target the pod badly. By copying A10C's TGP code, we can greatly reduce the time required, and we will get a targeting pod faster to solve the problem of "yes" and "no". After we had the AGM88 missile, we soon had the TGP.

Your wish has been fulfilled. In the latest Mini update, they acknowledge that the F/A18 will be equipped with LITENING pods at the naval airport. They're going to let us have LITENING before we have ATFLIR.

Thank you

Hi! It is temporarily unavailable, but its appearance means that we will be able to use it in the near future. Like LGB

What we got was LGB.

No, we didn't get any JDAM. In the latest message, JDAM will start development after the current update is completed