AstonMartinDBS

That's not true. The kneeboards you copy to %USERPROFILE%\Saved Games\DCS\Kneeboard are available with every aircraft and on every map - even if it's confusing, if you have a lot of kneeboards. That's an option, but you may have to reinstall the kneeboards after every DCS update. And it maybe impacts the game integrity check, if you copy the kneeboards directly into the DCS installation files.

Exactly. Simply extract them to %USERPROFILE%\Saved Games\DCS\Kneeboard

If your issue is related to the mission pack "Stolen Content" you should open a new thread and/or ask in the comment section of the download page, otherwise it is OT. AFAIK you don't need any mods for this mission pack. Simply run a repair of your DCS installation.

ED sadly doesn't care about the missions delivered with the AH-64D... Try this one: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3322077/

Just provide the trackfile of your flight, so we can take a look.

Yes, it seems to be fixed now

I've tested the mission right now and had also a CTD after the rendezvous and during escort. Crash reported at https://forum.dcs.world/topic/367690-ctd-ah-64d-mission-mountain-coin/

DCS crashed a few minutes after the rendezvous, during convoy escort. Sadly there is no track file available at %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Temp\DCS\LastMissionTrack.trk I've attached the modified mission file from the thread. The original mission, which was delivered with the AH-64D, is broken. PG AH-64D MountainCOIN (fv22).miz dcs.log.old dcs.log

I'll try to test it in the next few days. Did you experience a CTD after arriving at AA53?

I've observed this right now while creating a track for another bug (weird colors of powerlines). I'm not sure, if this issue is related exclusive to the Huey or if it's related to the map (Caucasus). Track: CA UH-1H LandingOnWater PowerlineColor.trk Screenshots:

That's exactly the same, what I observed after the recent patch: BTW: The issue with landing on water has been reported separately in the UH-1H section. CA UH-1H LandingOnWater PowerlineColor.trk

You're right, but my timings @4800 are the same as @XMP-5200, so the performance loss should be around 7,7 % compared to XMP-5200: For me it is important, that I see no performance loss in DCS or FS2024. Only benchmarks will show the difference.

As I configured my PC in 05/2023 I checked the Memory QVL of my MB. I equipped it with 2 x 32 GB initially and set the priority to the upgradability to 128 GB. This was the reason, why I've chosen those DDR5-5200 modules. I didn't know about the restrictions when populating all four DIMM slots until I got the POST error message after upgrading to 128 GB a few days ago... the QVL promises a "Supported Speed" of "5200" with 4 DIMMs populated. "Very slow" is exaggerated. Well, the modules are not the fastest, but I see absolutely no performance loss after decreasing the DRAM frequency from 5200 to 4800. Everything runs smooth as usual. And I think an upgrade to 6000+ MHz modules isn't worth the performance benefit.

Take care when you select the RAM for your new PC! I've upgraded my PC after more than a year from 64 GB (2 x 32 GB) to 128 GB (4 x 32 GB), using the identical DRAM5-5200 Modules. As my system didn't boot with XMP enabled (even though this configuration is in the QVL for my Mainboard), I sadly had do deactivate XMP and lower the DRAM frequency to 4800 MHz. It's obviously a known behaviour that you may won't benefit of the full DRAM speed, if you populate all four DRAM slots. So try to get 2 x 48 GB or 2 x 64 GB modules if possible to get the full speed of your DRAM Modules.

Hellfires don't work that way. Explanation: