Picchiorosso

[SIG A101] Dax - Viggen

I have to congratulate Shadow on the great mission organized last night. Immersive and really interesting campaign. Thanks for the great experience. SIG[A101] Dax

I would like to thank, on behalf of myself and the group to which I belong, the organizers for the evening spent and for the beautiful battle faced. I sincerely hope to participate in your next events. Thanks again. [sIG A101] Dax

In flight [sIG A 101] Dax If is possible I take the AJS-37 Thanks

Thank you guys. Now everything works perfectly.

No I did not. I update you after trying. Do you know that after this procedure the Datalink works again? I'll update you if everything is back to working properly. Thanks for your help.

Hello to all. I waited to report this problem to understand if someone else was aware of it and to understand if it is a bug but I have not found anything on the forum. My problem is that after the last update, performing all the cold start procedures, I have no signal on the datalink and the navigation system remains blocked. Before the update everything worked perfectly. Using the Pod Lantrin the pointer on the HUD remains fixed in the center even if in the MFD the pointer moves and the Bombs are in CCRP mode. I disabled the module, I removed and reinstalled the module but nothing. The problem persists. I don't know if it's a bug or just my problem. Thanks for your attention

If it is possible to have 1 f18 Thank you. I hope to bring some friends to do this mix In fly Dax is my callsign

Callsing in Fligt Dax Side Blue and Lonewolf Aircraft preference 1° F18 2° F16 3° F15 Ping 138 Tanks Better to give up a mission and bring the man and plane home than losing a man with years of training and a plane that can do many other attacks.

T/Y guy

Hi guys. With the last release I find the frequencies in the upper left of the monitor. I don't need to see the frequencies so I would like to know how to remove them from the screen. Thanks

I hope that talking about Radar A / G has not become a taboo. No more than a month ago I posted a question on the forum. is the case to "accelerate" the development of the A / G radar? I'm not talking about the answers I had (a bit aggressive) :), but I am talking about the fact that moving a small percentage of resources in this sense would calm the waters slightly. People have many expectations on the radar A / G is proof of the frequent "reminders" in this sense there are others that the radar AG does not care about anything with various statements. I believe that as always the truth is in the middle and it is also true that if we refer to the 70/80 years some aircraft were built on AG radar capabilities. As said, it is possible or not to agree and it is up to the developers to decide whether "accelerating" or not on the Radar A / G is certain, my feeling, is that a bit of discontent grows. I hope not to offend anyone with these my statements. Thanks anyway to the developers for what they gave us and what they will give us in the coming days, months and years. In fly Dax

Thanks for the information. In Fly Dax

I don't know if it can be inherent in the subject and if it has already been reported. To me, in a Persian Gulf server, it happened that I attached a column in a street with AGM 65F but I locked something fixed near the moving TGT. I noticed only after 2 missiles thrown away that the road was lined with a small electric line with wooden poles (invisible from 8 NM). As we know the electric pole has no IR relevance and so I wonder if this is also a new problem. Thank you for your attention. in Fly Dax

What do you mean calmly? has the walley been implemented that has given 1 month of problems and you can't work more on the AG radar? I didn't ask that tomorrow they have to put the AG radar on the F18 or the F16 and I didn't ask that I have to have the TWS on the F18 tomorrow, I didn't ask for the GBU 39 if you want i continue. I asked time or not to accelerate on a Radar AG system and you insist on giving the same answers. You can answer that it is not the case and you do not agree. Mine is a wish and not an order. For KTFGB..... I did not say that it is modeled correctly. keep putting words in my mouth that I didn't write. Thanks for your attention. T / Y all. Dax