Picchiorosso

[SIG A101] Dax - Viggen

I have to congratulate Shadow on the great mission organized last night. Immersive and really interesting campaign. Thanks for the great experience. SIG[A101] Dax

I would like to thank, on behalf of myself and the group to which I belong, the organizers for the evening spent and for the beautiful battle faced. I sincerely hope to participate in your next events. Thanks again. [sIG A101] Dax

In flight [sIG A 101] Dax If is possible I take the AJS-37 Thanks

Thank you guys. Now everything works perfectly.

No I did not. I update you after trying. Do you know that after this procedure the Datalink works again? I'll update you if everything is back to working properly. Thanks for your help.

Hello to all. I waited to report this problem to understand if someone else was aware of it and to understand if it is a bug but I have not found anything on the forum. My problem is that after the last update, performing all the cold start procedures, I have no signal on the datalink and the navigation system remains blocked. Before the update everything worked perfectly. Using the Pod Lantrin the pointer on the HUD remains fixed in the center even if in the MFD the pointer moves and the Bombs are in CCRP mode. I disabled the module, I removed and reinstalled the module but nothing. The problem persists. I don't know if it's a bug or just my problem. Thanks for your attention

If it is possible to have 1 f18 Thank you. I hope to bring some friends to do this mix In fly Dax is my callsign

Callsing in Fligt Dax Side Blue and Lonewolf Aircraft preference 1° F18 2° F16 3° F15 Ping 138 Tanks Better to give up a mission and bring the man and plane home than losing a man with years of training and a plane that can do many other attacks.

T/Y guy

Hi guys. With the last release I find the frequencies in the upper left of the monitor. I don't need to see the frequencies so I would like to know how to remove them from the screen. Thanks

I hope that talking about Radar A / G has not become a taboo. No more than a month ago I posted a question on the forum. is the case to "accelerate" the development of the A / G radar? I'm not talking about the answers I had (a bit aggressive) :), but I am talking about the fact that moving a small percentage of resources in this sense would calm the waters slightly. People have many expectations on the radar A / G is proof of the frequent "reminders" in this sense there are others that the radar AG does not care about anything with various statements. I believe that as always the truth is in the middle and it is also true that if we refer to the 70/80 years some aircraft were built on AG radar capabilities. As said, it is possible or not to agree and it is up to the developers to decide whether "accelerating" or not on the Radar A / G is certain, my feeling, is that a bit of discontent grows. I hope not to offend anyone with these my statements. Thanks anyway to the developers for what they gave us and what they will give us in the coming days, months and years. In fly Dax

Thanks for the information. In Fly Dax

I don't know if it can be inherent in the subject and if it has already been reported. To me, in a Persian Gulf server, it happened that I attached a column in a street with AGM 65F but I locked something fixed near the moving TGT. I noticed only after 2 missiles thrown away that the road was lined with a small electric line with wooden poles (invisible from 8 NM). As we know the electric pole has no IR relevance and so I wonder if this is also a new problem. Thank you for your attention. in Fly Dax

What do you mean calmly? has the walley been implemented that has given 1 month of problems and you can't work more on the AG radar? I didn't ask that tomorrow they have to put the AG radar on the F18 or the F16 and I didn't ask that I have to have the TWS on the F18 tomorrow, I didn't ask for the GBU 39 if you want i continue. I asked time or not to accelerate on a Radar AG system and you insist on giving the same answers. You can answer that it is not the case and you do not agree. Mine is a wish and not an order. For KTFGB..... I did not say that it is modeled correctly. keep putting words in my mouth that I didn't write. Thanks for your attention. T / Y all. Dax

Sorry Fri13 ..... every time you bring up things that most people know, like modern planes, like the complexity of a war scenario but, I repeat, this is not the topic. We have established and acknowledged and written it since the beginning of the discussion, the AG radar is not easy to program for the reasons you have listed. Never mind the BMS ...... let's talk about DCS. If you have Viggen you know very clearly what I'm talking about. All the upgrades have perfected the armaments, the sensors, the performances, the breakdowns etc etc., why not also try with the Radar AG? The question is time "to strive" on the AG radar can improve the palatability of the DCS aircraft as it is a niche simulator. In my opinion yes and I believe it is the opinion of many people. In Fly Dax

As usual I want to calm the spirits. The problem is that we see the AG radar as a settling thing. We need to imagine the system interfaced with others. Would the El Dorado Canyon operation be possible without radar AG? For me no. The operation Operation Babylon would have been possible without radar AG? For me no. If you think it is overrated, why was the radar set on the AV-8B Harrier II Plus? We know why, for AA but above all for AG sea. We all know that the radar for inertial navigation systems in the 70s and 90s also served to carry out the FIX of a ship point for the decay of gyroscopic systems (about 3NM / h). I opened this discussion not to see who is right and who is wrong, but the need to evaluate the development of AG radar systems on DCS. Here we are not seeing those who are stronger, we are seeing opportunities. Thanks for your attention. In Fly Dax

I didn't say the opposite. As for what you say is sacrosanct. I have not talked about anti-IR camouflage as new antiradar materials (ships and tanks). Quote. In the first Gulf War to hit a target 12 planes were needed in the second with an airplane could hit 4 targets. So I repeat that mine is a question and not a provocation and that in a complex scenario everything has its importance and those who believe that the AG radar does not have its importance in my opinion underestimate it. If we then return from the 70s to the 90s then we see that some planes have been designed precisely on the radar AG functions. Now I hope I have clarified my position. T/Y in FLy Dax

therefore 1 I inform you the only components that prohibit the flight are those of emergency and survival. 2 The systems on military aircraft are interfaced to have the best possible result, that is to say, fulfill their mission, proof is the importance of the JTAC datalink and other things. 3 The radar finds the tgt in movement the fixed tgt and the ships lost in the sea. 4 AWACS or JTSTAR see traffic on roads. 5 In a real war scenario the moves that are made are not made by incompetents and every land and sky mission is planned wisely. 6 I didn't talk about bms 7 I don't see why you get so upset, I just asked a question and I'm not here to criticize the work of the DCS programmers but just the expectation to close a circle for this simulator. In Fly Dax

In fact, my thread is a question. I understand and know the difficulties in creating a mapping of the terrain in AG and also that the Viggen radar AG is simpler and has less data to process than a F16 or F18 radar. My question that has given rise to my question is the fact that many are asking, rightly, for this or that type of AG armament to be implemented, forgetting the importance in the military flight of the radar AG. It is my opinion that the AG radar in the 3 modes would make the simulator jump in quality and I also understand that it is really difficult to implement. In fliy Dax

I assure you that if an airplane has to do an AG mission and has a failure on the radar ag, the plane does not fly. Does it seem unimportant to you? If you don't have the radar AG how do you see the moving vehicles? The TGP works well if interfaced with the AG radar, otherwise all the missions must be done in PrePlanned. Do you believe that the tanks remain still waiting for a hunt to hit? If you have Viggen see the difference In flight Dax

As far as my thinking is worth, I believe DCS planes work far below their potential without radar AG. I am in possession of the AJS-37 Viggen module and when I fly, I understand that the AG radar is fundamental. I hope that there is an acceleration on the part of the programmers in this sense because, in my opinion, in the AG, the airplanes that are not in possession of them fly 50% of their potential. Thanks for your attention. On fly Dax

La lettera "S" Dax

After the patch corrections when i release the first JDAM in TOO the mode returns to PP.

I have the same problem. Many problem with the JDAM and JSOW some time released some time not released and AGM62 it is not released in both modes.