-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
RWR issues? It's almost like the closer a radar gets the stronger the signal.
-
Got it consistently inconstant.
-
Interesting why the ALR-56C on the Eagle works completely different than the ALR-56M in the Viper. We will see how the C-130 ALR-56M works when it gets pushed out. The amount of logic that is not used with the creation of the ALR-56M in the Viper is fascinating. I am sure both sides is getting tired of this issue being brought up but it is hard to not continue to talk about it when it is a legitimate issue that many people have brought up time and time again.
-
Is the ALR-56M adjusted yet?
-
Oh topic was moved here.
-
Interesting
-
correct as is False Target appearing without radar scanning
Prime replied to Delta134's topic in Bugs and Problems
So if the F-16 is the only entity out there with no other radars and has its own radar is silent false targets will still formulate from nothing? @Lord Vader -
correct as-is based on documentation RWR ALR-56M in DCS World
Prime replied to kotor633's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
We are not making this up, strength is used to determine relative distance.- 9 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
Literally talking about strength in that first video at 28:14
-
ew
-
DCS F-16C Early Access, what's left, what's next.
Prime replied to RyanR's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
Thank you so much for your post. Giving it a plus one and will give plus 5 for the mentioning the RWR and the viper being useless in the SEAD role. Not sure why the RWR function silently changed from the initial release of the module. -
Electronic Warfare Seminar 28:14 RWR uses strength to determine lethality. Lots of more information from these videos.
-
correct as-is based on documentation RWR ALR-56M in DCS World
Prime replied to kotor633's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
Indeed interesting -
SA-11 shoots at ring around 20 miles not 6 miles prior like the SA-6 in comparison.