Prime

Interesting why the ALR-56C on the Eagle works completely different than the ALR-56M in the Viper. We will see how the C-130 ALR-56M works when it gets pushed out. The amount of logic that is not used with the creation of the ALR-56M in the Viper is fascinating. I am sure both sides is getting tired of this issue being brought up but it is hard to not continue to talk about it when it is a legitimate issue that many people have brought up time and time again.

Is the ALR-56M adjusted yet?

Oh topic was moved here.

Interesting

So if the F-16 is the only entity out there with no other radars and has its own radar is silent false targets will still formulate from nothing? @Lord Vader

We are not making this up, strength is used to determine relative distance.

Literally talking about strength in that first video at 28:14

ew

Thank you so much for your post. Giving it a plus one and will give plus 5 for the mentioning the RWR and the viper being useless in the SEAD role. Not sure why the RWR function silently changed from the initial release of the module.

Electronic Warfare Seminar 28:14 RWR uses strength to determine lethality. Lots of more information from these videos.

Indeed interesting

Holding the uncage button in Air to Ground mode will cycle to Gun Strafe Mode. However this is not implemented in DCS.

SA-11 shoots at ring around 20 miles not 6 miles prior like the SA-6 in comparison.

Just did a test flew at the SA-6 at .84 23k and it shot at 19.6 miles. Beamed with a speed of .65 and the missile blew up like 5.8 miles away. It is interesting that the SA-6 decides to shoot at that increased range. Not very conservative of missiles being that it only has 3 on each launcher. Would think it would wait for a better shot using its search radar then pop on and do the classic SAMBUSH.

So why use 13.5nm for the circle size instead of the 19.2nm WEZ like in the community had to make because one is not provided?