Vecko

Yeaaaah, armagedon is closing !!!:lol:

Next thing is that ANOYING lag in the mission with large number of units.If someone have just an single flight on 159th hi will know what i'm talking about... I is not big varp lag like we in have in 1.12, it is more like buzzy , jumping around prrr-prrr-prrr helicopters :).Someone say that is connection issue but 159th have dedicated serrver with very good up/dl speed... I CAN'T imagine gunzo fight in FC2.0 with that cind of lag...

Definitely yes...if mission is advanced with large amount of ground units and AI aircrafts (especially with that deam F/A-18 who is attacking frienlyes all the time :D) things can be very bad...

Lets just say that it is almost normal that serrver is crashing fiew times in one day if mission is little bit advanced and 10+ players is online...You know,i spend lot of time in DCS serrvers(159th dedicated and 104th) and looks like stability is still much better in 1.12 in compare to DCS.I think 159th Fudd ,159th Shallow G and Pancertard can tell you more...

GG, can you compare onlyne stabilty of FC2.0 and DCS:BS?Any improvements?

Is is possible to see number of used missiles for each player in stat? Amounth of used missile/kill ratio can be very interesting information...

alt ~1500-2000m , angle 20-30, speed ~700kph , laser range finder ON - ,try this ;)

You mean laser rangefinder failure after some time...Hm , nobody said nothing about that...

TY for answer GG...

You know i don't care, if you like you can make ET selfdestruct if is launched without valid IR lock,but i if i have full lock on hot target pls don't steal my "missile energy"...Or i'm asking to much?;) Excuse me,i don't understand this,you mean you don't know or you can't say because you are in testers team?

Picture talk more then my bad english...You don't need to be physicist to see that this is not caused by "rounded dome".;) Missiles was launched at 12:00:00 from same alt and speed,speed loss of ET after buster is gone is outstanding.In fight this 'bug' is shown like almost 50% shorter range of ET in compare to his packman ER brother(or sister ;))...

well, if ET have same mass, dimensions and same start speed like ER,is it logical to have same balistic range like ER missile, in FC this is not case...You can try yourself,shoot this two missiles and watch map view... I mean, i understand why this "feature"is added, to prevent maddoging from longer range BUT, if you fix ET angle of view in FC2.0 like you said,this unvisible airbrake is no more needed... And if someone from testers team can give me an answer pls, simple yes or no will be good enough...If we have same settings in FC2.0 like on this chafing video,whether this continues to happen?

Is airbrake on R-27ET fixed? Does SARH missiles still eating chafs like packman?We all know about this video...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3lGvfVxuBs&feature=related

You must change driver.Try some older...

Year?

Dobar glas ima...:megalol:

Try to reduce your speed on 15kph,then hit auto hower button...

Very nice,and relaxing too, video shows new (lovemaking)face of DCS :P

Have little patience...Rumors say that one of beta testers guys manage to kill F-15 with SU-27 soo ... they need to fix that bug...:D

Must be......CD?:)

Maybe it is better to say "you should be repaired" becaus ground crue is very bugfull in the simm.Sometimes they just dont wanna to do their job ...

Only in recon mod...

Hehe,i don't see good, what is that writen on the tail???:music_whistling:

O realy...:) My grandfather told me that only one thing is impossible and that is wooden furnace ;).

Naaaah ,don't be skeptic .Waiting mean just one thing , we will get totally stable and bugfree simulation finally,wright?:huh: