BrokenArrow

I launched it on the max range and keep the target locked, that missile will not go active immediately.

I have noticed in TacView just immediately after firing missiles against BOTs in TWS(i am in F15 with 120C), They started chaffing, actually, there is no way they can find missile is in the air, Is this a bug? Someone else faced it? :(

More missiles always have advantages and AAMs are not 2000lb in weight. Unlike what everyone says missiles does not have 90% hit ratio in practical situations. It is always good to have a sensible amount of missiles in hand.

Yes, F-16 is more than capable of carrying double racks, some of those single pylons f16 carry 2000lb bombs, so it is not a performance issue. Some of the future versions of the F16 does have that.

Yes Yes Yes Especially when you want to play multiplayer/bigger missions. I had issue where my CPU and GPU usage was 60-50% usage and getting low fps(10-20fps), Once i updated to 32GB, FPS never gone below 60.

I am not running VR, but I am using it in 4K monitor, I am getting around 70-100 fps, with 2080 ti and 3700x, GPU usage is mostly 98-100%. If your GPU limit is only 65% something else will be limiting it.

Sure, just placed order, I will add my findings here. Just wished DCS have a official benchmark option like other games.

Okay, I have found F4-3600C16D-32GTZNC in QVL, https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/SocketAM4/PRIME_X570-P/Memory_QVL_3rd_Gen_AMD_Ryzen_Processors_X570_0722.pdf So I have decided to spend 50 more, Thank You for sharing all these info.

3200 one I am looking for is Corsair Vengeance CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 3600 one I am looking for is G.Skill Trident Z Neo F4-3600C16D-32GTZNC Based on expertise you have, can you suggest which one will be better for overclocking?

Thank you for the reply, And Nice detailed youtube channel. :thumbup: I have reached conflict reading your comment. Considering 60fps means 16ms frame delay, in that delay, 80ns is almost negligible, right? like instead of 16ms we get 16.000080ms. That does not seem to worth 50 EUR for me. Or am I missing some points?

Thank You for the reply, If I am not asking too much, :) can you please downclock your memory to 3200mhz and can check for any rough fps differences?

Hi, So I am building a new system, 3700x, with 570 chipsets. I have decided to buy 32GB Memory, I need help to decide on two options. 1. 3200mhz - CL16 - 125 EUR 2. 3600mhz - CL16 - 180 EUR Other higher speed options have a very high price, And that is out of my budget :(. Which option should I go for? does How much improvement a 3600mhz can give in DCS? Other system specs, 2080Ti, M.2, 4k 60fps monitor.

This is what i think, More fps means more load on CPU. More pixels means more load on GPU. I am getting 60-100fps in my system for single player, (i7, 16GB RAM, 2080 Ti). CPU usage is around 40-60%, GPU usage is around 85-95%. This is with High settings in DCS, and Default navidya settings. But since i have only 16GB ram heavy missions/multiplayer have problem. I willl soon upgrade to 32GB. So my suggestion, 32GB ram is a must, If you have some extra money to spend, then spend it on GPU.

May be DL is Data link? I did wondered sometimes why i can overtake 9x fired by me. :) But i think i canot see failure rate warning for 9x like other missiles. If missile failure rate is 100%, should why is it enabled in the server ;).

That very sad to see that is the only one sentence you have to comment about on my posts. And why should I feel "vindictive"? I am thankful that we have a Dogfight server. I am not sure, maybe because my first language is not English, I did not say I support someone else stealing someone's work. But there might be people creating fake servers because of these limitations. Yeah if someone copy server name exactly that might be "childish". But if someone designs similar mission their own, similar to JSF, allow all dogfighting weapons and names it DOGFIGHT I don't think there is nothing illegal about it. Did you have different thoughts about that? Also, the point I have to say is there is a scope for Dogfight server pretty similar to JSF, that allow all dogfighting weapons. I don't think that not hate against anyone but it is a smart idea. And I am not surprised if such a server comes up. Anyway, I am so sorry if that hurt you so much.:smilewink:.

There are many players that uses MIG21 in missiles section, why? it can carry good number of missiles and it has a low heat signature. So increase the heat signature of MIG 21 then? Of course, I am may be not an experienced player like you, but I have played a significant hour in the server when AIM9x was enabled, never seen a 0-25 kill ratio. Of course, if you are playing against a noobie, you can get 25 kill ratio. Before Viper was coming to the server, I was only using flanker, and I did kill F18s with 9x using R73s. And also after getting viper, I did flow in server with flanker and F15, That time kill ratio is low, so what, Even if it is a 1 kill against my 5 deaths, flying against a modern fighter is something i can enjoy. I saw the previous post some fake server is coming up, Maybe I am getting it now, why it is happening.

Serious question, why do you play DCS then, If you need so much balance, go play ACE compact. There are 1000's of other factors that bring imbalance in DCS, So why only correct imbalance by AIM9x? If anyone wants 100% realism they won't be flying in DCS, they will be real-life pilots. No offense, But removing weapons like AIM9x does not bring any balance, they why we are removing it in the first place.

Why JF17? I have quite surprised to see a plane inducted in 2007 is coming to DCS. Other planes like F22(1996), Dassault Rafale(2001), Eurofighter Typhoon(2003) and a lot of other mass-produced planes nowhere to be seen. 1. What is the logic behind this? Is it like a developer develop on a plane and just publish it? 2. Most of the new plane's capabilities are unknowns, including JF17, so development are made on just speculation?

Thanks again for the detailed reply, Indeed it seems to be a heated topic reading few posts. Yes 9x is very capable missiles better than 73s. Also, I believe 73s are better than 9Ms. 73s also have off bore helmet system, I feel like 73s give slightly more Bore site angle than 9ms also 73s very close range performance is much better. So there will be always one missile better than the others. So I think keeping 9x is the better choice. Because removing 9x bring advantage to planes flying 73s. The only option i does not even understand is "Remove them from F16s, leave 2 on F18s". That absolutely does't seem fare :) and does not make any sense.

F16 not able to rearm flares, & why no 9xs? FIrst thanks for running this amazing server. I have two things i hav to share, 1. F16s not able to rearm with flares, please check why it is(May be i am doing wrong) 2. Also why removed 9x from the game? To make it fare we should remove r73s, or keep it both.

Someone gonna hurt :smilewink: