BrokenArrow

Agree, this is unpopular and dump idea

This is a bug on the basic thing, seems to be intentional

Anyone facing issue related to damage model? One F16 eat 4 of my AIM120c's and still not dead

There you go again, I want my SD-10 to work for 1000km

I have seen NWS light there, but it should have 3 lights, what are the other 2? https://i.imgur.com/4g6ItjC.png :helpsmilie:

We need Ray Tracing

Okay, Thanks, But this is really weird I never switched back to stable version, I was using beta for some time.

Yes, i got the same problem, even tried repair, no luck.

For that second turn it is not on track not even it's radar cone, but still it goes for chaff

I don't know how AMRAAM suddenly to go for chaff at least 80 degrees offset.

Does your AMRAAM can do this? https://i.imgur.com/rytQTQ9.mp4, Track, Go for chaff, Track again, Then go agin for chaff

I can confirm that using 2 EUR windows 10 pro licence for a few months, not issues.

BrokenArrow Blue F-15 , Thanks !

The realism of DCS is questionable in many ways, especially after the release of a few recent planes. There is no way to guarantee high fidelity model is more accurate, Also in JUST DOGFIGHT server balance matters more than realism, Just go back few more pages you can see lot of threads talking about banning AIM 9X :megalol:

106 range is the AIM120C C5 variant. same one as in the DCS. Yes, amrams have very mad recently. https://i.imgur.com/rytQTQ9.mp4, Track, Go for chaff, Track again, Then go agin for chaff

Why opensources like Wikipedia says, AIM120C is >105km range and SD 10 is 75-100km range, i also heard some sources saying SD10 is between R77 and AIM120C, which is true?

Compared to AIM120C, SD10 is bigger in diameter, more weight, more length, bigger wings still less drag. I am no scientist, but that does not make any sense to me.

Similar specs, But should have waited. Using FE 2080Ti for quite some time, Detailed specs below. I also want to point out this 30-50% improvemnt is becasue it is 4k, i did not expect such improvement in lower res. But if I was in your position I would wait for 3080ti though, expected to be more value/money.

Yes, this is something I have experienced after lot of troubleshooting. My CPU or GPU was not using more than 50%, This issue only was for multiplayer servers. Singleplayer there is no such issue. tried a lot of stuff including increasing paging size no luck, What I figured out even ram usage was not 100%,(it was more like 90%+) DCS is requesting more ram than that we can see it in processor commit size that was usually around(19-28GB). So increasing ram size to 32 GB improved my multiplayer performance by 5 times as you stated. And no, I won't increase further if we add more ram. :thumbup:

I would love to take F16 slot please, Second option F15

I had some issues with 16Gb RAM, Mostly fine for single-player missions, but if you go for multiplayer missions, fps was like 10-15fps. once i upgraded to 32Gb, fps changed to 60+. Of course, my system was not bottlenecked by CPU or GPU when I used 16GB.

If your system support, go for M.2, There is't much price difference b/w SATA and M.2, but read speeds will be much better. Also, go for a minimum 512GB, That will give you enough space, even you can move windows to that drive.

Yes, I do used to get 90% hit in DCS when playing against AI or noobies. If you are playing against matching platform/player, then I usually fire ahead make him defensive. We make defensive turns drop altitude and fire more. I usually get 1 kill like for say 3-4 120cs. Maybe I am not an expert like you all. In real life, I think that it will be even difficult to archive considering modern EW suits and the reliability of weapons. That fancy video is produced by Lockheed martin aimed for the foreign markets evaluated by an expert. May be DCS pilots are more expert than them? :D. I don't think they will make video of something that does not make any sense. F18 can carry 10 amraams, is Drag not a problem there? I don't have F18, but with 10 120c's is it CAT |||? Nice, I understand drag increases with more missiles, But just want to know why 6 missiles drag is the limit, adding 2 more make more punishment? Also i would like to see any videos docs regarding F6Ds, or F111B, please share if you can. A lot of modern fighters new 4th gen targeting to carry more missiles. like F21, F18, F15, why would manufacturers try to attempt anything like that if it is such a useless feature. Oh that is CGI, ah i thought it was real :D:D:D Everyone knows F16C in real life did not seems to carry dual rack pylons, the question is why not.

Well you can chaff even before anyone launches missiles. If you have more than enough of it :D But as I said AI chaffs exacts second I get of missile how would that happen?