sungsam

Karagounis no Go with Germany. The referee invented Yellow card for trying to force a penalty.

What do you know about Thermopilai ? :D Seriously, it is a hard game. Chances are with Germany, but Greek team is a "crazy" one. They "deny" to play the ball with Poland and Chech, and then they Win The Russians ! Pilotasso, by the way have a look at this video in case you miss it :thumbup:

You tell me ! Mine Had to sack 1 or 2 Goals every time just to wake up and show their potentials. They equalize score, But too late to win, they let us all :doh:

Why are you torturing me for spreading some info ? I thought you were not sure. :)

I read your post. I just posted for informational reasons. :huh:

Mvsgas, you can have a look here. Hellenic F-16 Block 52+ with AGM-88 HARM missile http://s7.invisionfree.com/worldconflictsforum/ar/t3727.htm

I Agree. The DCS Prefix must be something like an award to 3d party Devs after quality check pass and contribution from ED.

I read all the thread, and analytics about simulation engine advantages / disadvantages of both DCS/BMS, as long as all the philosophy about why the Falcon community persists on .... etc. A lot of people in this forum, have years of experience on both DCS/BMS as I do, and I'm sure this talking of comparison has became boring to death . The answer is so simple.... IT IS THE F16 FALCON THIS COMMUNITY WANTS TO EXPERIANCE ... IT IS THE MULTIPLE THEATERS OF WAR THE WANT TO FLY. ... And to be honest the lower resources needed of this old engine compared to the modern PCs. The question is: IS ENYBODY READY to hold on the responsibility of creating the Desperately needed DCS F16 in Hi fidelity? Cause he must be prepared to support the FALCON community!

:) Yea ... I'm getting old, overloaded and impatient, I need everything at hand.

Inside Mission resourse window in real time. Total/maximum Weight already included with Total dynamicaly variate on loadout. I'd like to have rolling / takeoff speeds, distance variate the same way etc ....

I admit, I like this future, It's certendly needed and adds to the overall imerssion. So I start to change payloads and watch the Total Weight change accordingly. ... oops acceded Maximum ... must reduce weight ..... everything good ! But ..... Now what is my rolling speed ? My take off one ? What's the distance needed for ? What's the airfield's lenght ? I know It's easy to find out by charts all around community, But wouldn't be convenient to have values available on deck ?

Block 30 is known as a dogfighter and is the most agile as far as I know among blocks

Come on people use your mind. F15 is a superiority fighter (BVR). It's size does not make it a better dogfighter (BFM) than F16. It's superior Radar is useless on BFM. It can be put easily on gun sites, It's double the size. It's thrust is better but also the weight is more. I dont think it gives much of advantage. Basicaly do not compare different Tools.

Indeed nice work for beginning, but in the future... - I think you must calm it. This is excessive conditions like 12 bofors or more :) - You have to expirement with new textures to include sea foam on such conditions for realistic representation. I understand this is early stages so keep on, looks very promising.

I like variety on A/Cs, so why not P51? In future, I'm expecting a helo and a fast mover also

Not really a smart ass here, but i just want express some considerations of mine and would be glad to hear some opinion of you. Since we move to a modular architecture, what would be the potential of making the DCS modules capable of communicating over network? - In my limited imagination, an advantage would be to have a PC running DCS Word and another one DCS <Aircraft>. That way distribution of resource consumption would be possible. - Further brake down could be DCS theater modules, a DCS client for communicating with the above modules over network etc.... - Then imagine the benefits on professional implementation versions of ED’s simulations, or even a future ED Server environment "playground" for customers. (Free charge of course :)) Is there really a provisioning on this path for ED or my imagination is totally wrong and sever disadvantages lurking below such a development course? What do you think about?

Thanks for anwering. Yes I do talking about distributed processing over a LAN/broadband connection, and your point on multicore procensing is right.

DCS Modular Architecture over network Not really a smart ass here, but i just want express some considerations of mine and would be glad to hear some opinion of you. Since we move to a modular architecture, what would be the potential of making the DCS modules capable of communicating over network? - In my limited imagination, an advantage would be to have a PC running DCS Word and another one DCS <Aircraft>. That way distribution of resource consumption would be possible. - Further brake down could be DCS theater modules, a DCS client for communicating with the above modules over network etc.... - Then imagine the benefits on professional implementation versions of ED’s simulations, or even a future ED Server environment "playground" for customers. (Free charge of course :)) Is there really a provisioning on this path for ED or my imagination is totally wrong and sever disadvantages lurking below such a development course? What do you think about?

NOoo ! ! ! .... In the morning was A10C now BS2 ! ... too many Good news today, that i can't hold any longer ... I feel dizzy --- I'm passing out ! :crazy:

Still Game avionics mode works ? I Thought that bug has been fixed ! :smilewink: I'm joking, Please wait for anothers replay, if any ...

:) Well, you know it is fashion lately, ARMA 3 has a lunatic senario about Hellas (Greece) and our future neighbors Iran :doh: Honestly, Balkans may give interesting and complex scenario opportunites as Sobek asks for ..

+1 for Disneyland :)

For me it works by changing usb port. If I change usb port it ask for reinstalling drivers sometimes (ports that never plugged the stick before). That also means that a recalibration happens by changing usb indepentably of driver installation request. In my case I use USB hub, so conflict could also apply. Dirt plays its role, but not in my case since everything works ok after actions above. There are also cases of internal cabling wear out. I just mention all these for a wider view of problem reasoning.

Go to Saitek controller settings and see if Throttle axis tremples there. It happens to me also with another axis periodically. I don't know why but if I plug it on another usb port and / or reinstall drivers problem disapears.

Still no sticky ? :smilewink: