Kenan

I also purchased BS1 some time ago and it's now missing from my Payments list..I just don't know where to start first..wait for the MP fix and only afterwards pursue this second issue..

I filed a support ticket, it's been over a day now and still no response. I have a feeling this is a global bug and it's affecting everyone with DCS Warthog module (or at least fair number of people). I have both Warthog AND Combined Arms (both english download versions) on one account and for whatever reason, A10C module screws up the MP login..

I would +1 the OP if there wasn't a serious issue with A10C module and MP login. But overall, I agree, for a beta, looks pretty good. :)

Or as Viper previously said, you can let this guy do all the aiming:

+1

^^Oh ok. Thanks for the info.

^^No idea? I have just switched between main gun and machine gun? Are you saying AP rounds are selected as default and as such do not produce explosion effect on the ground?

Turrets (Abrams, Howitzer..).

Erm...I don't have any ground explosions when I hit a hill or ground near me? I saw those in the youtube video posted in this thread. What gives? :)

I tried that. After installing Combined Arms fresh on DCS World, the login worked. After adding A10 module for DCS world, I now get the same MP invalid key error..I wonder how can that be possible when I have both DCS: Warthog and CA purchased on the same account?

This is just getting more and more fun. I deactivated my DCS World, then tried to reactivate by entering the same key that is still available at digitalcombatsimulator.com and now it won't get accepted?! I was expecting for the key on the main web page to be refreshed/changed but it's the same. The best part: the reactivation window already has some key entered and when I clicked "Activate" it accepted it (and I still have the same number of activations left). Of course, when trying to login in MP with the account details from the main site (I used for all my purchases) I get "Invalid serial key" message.. I have A10C and CA modules purchased for DCS World + DCS: Warthog. Is perhaps DCS: Warthog somehow in conflict with DCS World?

And now my account at DCS site shows under "Payments" that I paid for Warthog 1.2.0 and Combined Arms 1.2.0 and there's no Black Shark 1 listed in it though I paid for it (obviously long time ago) with the same account?

I sometimes wonder what the hell are beta testers doing when such serious bugs get apparent right after release, even if beta. Firstly, after purchasing CA, had to reinstall DCS World 3x untill I got this error fixed: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=90986 And now, I can't login to MP in DCS World and need to do what? Reinstall everything again and put one module at the time? Amazing..

Deleted DCS folder, reinstalled DCS World in a different folder (same partition) and it worked for me.

I think Wags did mention FPS infantry as one of the possibilities in the future. They can't just put every single feature in it at once, it's a huge task and they're doing it step by step..

Grab me some popcorns and coca-cola! :D http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_07_03/80124065/

Guys, keep this on topic please. Have you noticed how the weather today is little leess warm and there are even some clouds above Croatia?

It makes perfect sense. If I buy a car, I have every right to sell it, not be stuck with it for the rest of my life. Same should go for software.

When I saw the title I went in to congratulate you and wish you a long and happy marriage..and then I saw the post..:D

C version? Probably a 30 years old plane..It was bound to happen regardless of reliability of the design. And what's with all the emphasis on how noone was killed in the building it crashed into? Of course noone was killed, people are not modelled ffs.. Oh...they are? Sorry then.

I don't think this will ever happen..unless one module is of such a low quality and someone decides to make a better one. It is very unlikely a developer would invest time and resources into making an aircraft that is already available as a module. Unless, as I said, it's modelled poorly.

There's only a theoretical chance of a nucelar weapon usage. It's like two men stuck in a closed room, each holding a hand grenade. Regardless who throws it first, both are dead. This is why no nation would launch their nuclear missiles. The moment you fire your missile towards my capital, regardless how many lives you've destroyed, I'll be capable to order my own army to do the same to you. So it's pretty much a no-win situation. This is why all the nuclear missile silos are placed in remote locations. Not like they're in the cities so if you take out a city, you've taken out the missiles as well. With the technology we have these days, we're perfectly capable of mass killing ourselves with a good old conventional weapons. Just drop a CBU class bomb over a populated area or a battlefied and that's it..

What a nonsense..I've been having mine for 5 months and it's working great. Unless you're comparing the years Cougar's been out there but that isn't really a fair comparison since it's an old product.

If you're asking if ED should tell 3rd parties what aircraft they may or may not model, then definetelly NO, they shouldn't be able to do that. Of course, I'm all for quality control / approval process by ED..