Sabredog Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 No matter how many G's I pull the wings just stay on. Is structural damage from over stressing the airframe possible yet?
ED Team NineLine Posted August 6, 2014 ED Team Posted August 6, 2014 Hmm, I am sure I have done it... have to check again tonight... Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Narushima Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) Ripping the wings should not be possible. The Dora didn't have hydraulic boosted elevator control, so unless your pilot is the T-1000 Terminator, you won't be able to pull with enough force to break it. Might be possible with the trim though, it's electrically controlled. Btw, does anyone know what the ultimate load for the D-9 was? P-51 was around 9G-10G at fighter weight I think. EDIT: Ok, found it. Apparently, the ultimate load factor for the FW 190 was 11.16+ G at 4250kg. So you have to pull over 11G to break off the wings. Edited August 6, 2014 by Narushima FW 190 Dora performance charts: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=128354
Flagrum Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 I don't know what it was exactly, but while pulling out of a steep dive at (more than?) 700 km/h I suddenly wondered what all those pieces and chunks where that suddenly appeared around the canopy and disappeared with 700 km/h to the rear ... The wings did not break and were ripped off - they "desintegrated" piece by piece. That's at least how I percieved what happened ... as it happened rather quickly within 1-2 seconds before I blacked out and eventually burned to death ... :o)
outlawal2 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 I don't know what it was exactly, but while pulling out of a steep dive at (more than?) 700 km/h I suddenly wondered what all those pieces and chunks where that suddenly appeared around the canopy and disappeared with 700 km/h to the rear ... The wings did not break and were ripped off - they "desintegrated" piece by piece. That's at least how I percieved what happened ... as it happened rather quickly within 1-2 seconds before I blacked out and eventually burned to death ... :o) Well now THAT is a bad day... :cry: "Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence." RAMBO
Flagrum Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Well now THAT is a bad day... :cry: Aww ... nah, it was fun like hell! :smilewink:
Rabbit_ Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Is it really that important to rip the wings? :-D
ED Team NineLine Posted August 6, 2014 ED Team Posted August 6, 2014 Is it really that important to rip the wings? :-D Its natural to see the limits and how well its modelled... most everyone does it... not everyone will admit it ;) Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Merlin-27 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 (edited) I promise.. it can be done. At least I was able to accomplish it a few days ago. I will say it is very difficult to do so... which is a bit disappointing, considering it can be done quite easily in the stang. Ripping the wings should not be possible. The Dora didn't have hydraulic boosted elevator control, so unless your pilot is the T-1000 Terminator, you won't be able to pull with enough force to break it. The Mustang control surfaces will break off without any input while in a dive a bit over 500mph. The DCS Dora does not seem as fragile in my findings. I have not seen this at all. EDIT: And you bring up an interesting point... if that is the case and the pilot cannot combat the forces involved do the 190 controls stop responding in a dive? Edited August 6, 2014 by Merlin-27 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
Merlin-27 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Is it really that important to rip the wings? :-D It can be important when you are flying the enemy plane that is succeptable to wings snapping off quite easily. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] [Dogs of War] WWII COMBAT SERVER | P-51D - FW190-D9 - Me109-K4 Visit Our Website & Forum to Get More Info & Team Speak Access
outlawal2 Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 EDIT: And you bring up an interesting point... if that is the case and the pilot cannot combat the forces involved do the 190 controls stop responding in a dive? So an unrecoverable dive until the plane disintegrates. Now that would suck..:cry: "Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence." RAMBO
Narushima Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 EDIT: And you bring up an interesting point... if that is the case and the pilot cannot combat the forces involved do the 190 controls stop responding in a dive? No, but the controls are supposed to become heavy, and pull out that would rip off the wings should be nearly impossible for a normal human. But seeing how we are not affected by these forces on our home joysticks, I really can't tell to what extend this is modelled in DCS. FW 190 Dora performance charts: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=128354
Hueyman Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 EDIT: Ok, found it. Apparently, the ultimate load factor for the FW 190 was 11.16+ G at 4250kg. So you have to pull over 11G to break off the wings. If the max limit is 11G, you won't break your wings at 11G as there is a safety coefficient in every structures/mechanical parts, even ( especially ! ) in aeronautic engineering. from 8 to 15%, this safety coeff. ensure that the plane won't break at max allowable G, or at VNE or ... etc etc But it's not advisable as you may imagin, for the airframe longevity :thumbup: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPL(A)IR ME/SEP/MEP/SET - CPL(H)
Narushima Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 If the max limit is 11G, you won't break your wings at 11G as there is a safety coefficient in every structures/mechanical parts, even ( especially ! ) in aeronautic engineering. from 8 to 15%, this safety coeff. ensure that the plane won't break at max allowable G, or at VNE or ... etc etc But it's not advisable as you may imagin, for the airframe longevity :thumbup: 11,2 G is the ultimate load. The safety load was 6,2G, with a 1,8 safety factor (6,2G*1,8=11,16G). FW 190 Dora performance charts: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=128354
Hueyman Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 Oh ok sorry didn't know you mean ultimate load, I thought you told the normal max G-Load ;-) Cheers ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPL(A)IR ME/SEP/MEP/SET - CPL(H)
OutOnTheOP Posted August 6, 2014 Posted August 6, 2014 11,2 G is the ultimate load. The safety load was 6,2G, with a 1,8 safety factor (6,2G*1,8=11,16G). I'm fairly certain the Mustang was built to a design load (as you say, safety load) of 9G. I believe the factor in it's case was 1.5 (which would mean failure/ ultimate load at 13.5G), but I'm not certain on the safety margin.
Sabredog Posted August 6, 2014 Author Posted August 6, 2014 Well, I ripped the wings off. Full on clean break of the left wing. The rest of you will just have to try harder. I used a lot of nose-up trim and almost pulled my joystick off the desk. Took a lot of doing but it was worth it to see the Dora spinning around, one wing down. :thumbup:
Narushima Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 I'm fairly certain the Mustang was built to a design load (as you say, safety load) of 9G. I believe the factor in it's case was 1.5 (which would mean failure/ ultimate load at 13.5G), but I'm not certain on the safety margin. The one you quoted me on was for the Dora. P-51: 8G at 8000lb, which is 6,4G at 10000lb. With a safety factor of 1.5G that's 9,6G of ultimate load at 10000lb, so around 10G at standard fighter weight. See here: You might have to zoom in a bit to see what it says (ctrl + mouse wheel to zoom in your browser). FW 190 Dora performance charts: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=128354
Recommended Posts