FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Just a quick question, does DCS World currently support 7680x1440p resolution? Which would be triple 2560x1440p displays in surround. PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
cichlidfan Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 DCS will do it just fine. Your video card might be another matter. 2 ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:
FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 Sure why would it not? I dont know, just wondering, thank you for the help PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 DCS will do it just fine. Your video card might be another matter. very true, thank you for the help, I've seen benchmarks of dual 780s doing not too shabby at that resolution, how do you think dual 1080s would fare, seeing as they are about twice as fast as a 780 I am pretty confident the dual 1080s would do pretty well, do you think they would do well enough for playable fps? PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
agentdarnell Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Dual 1070s would be amazing for this, I don't think you would gain anything going to dual 1080 for the cost. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
SkateZilla Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 GTX 980 Maximum Digital Resolution is: 5120x3200 @ 60Hz 1 Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
cichlidfan Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 GTX 980 Maximum Digital Resolution is: 5120x3200 @ 60Hz Thanks. I could not remember the max. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:
FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 (edited) Dual 1070s would be amazing for this, I don't think you would gain anything going to dual 1080 for the cost. [ame] [/ame] This video (near the end) shows benchmarks where the 1070 is VERY close to the 1080 in 4K benchmarks. The 1080 still has the GDDR5X which is very enticing as well as the little extra umph that may get me up a few settings but the 1070 is the price/performance king. You have made me consider the 1070 SLI, the 1080s OCed still may be insane. I have tried OCing before and it always downclocked my card to 540MHz so i decided to leave it alone but if I ever get the money for SLI 1070 or 1080 it will hopefully go better. Here are some 1080 SLI benchmarks But in this video the 1080 matches the 1070 SLI quiet often (depending on game) and when it does beat it, it looks to me as if a 1080 would give much higher fps when in SLI compared to 1070 SLI [ame] [/ame] http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-1080-2-way-sli-review,1.html Edited June 12, 2016 by FireFox500 PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 GTX 980 Maximum Digital Resolution is: 5120x3200 @ 60Hz That is just on one monitor though correct? I've got a 980 and I run 5760x1080 but because its triple 1920x1080 it doesn't go over the limit right? PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
agentdarnell Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Yep that gtx 1070 sli video was really ghetto. Will wait for better benchmarks to come out. Hopefully soon the cards will be released. You have to think the gtx 1070 was benchmarking better than the gtx 980 and even better than the 980 ti on many benchmarks. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FireFox500 Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 (edited) Yep that gtx 1070 sli video was really ghetto. Will wait for better benchmarks to come out. Hopefully soon the cards will be released. You have to think the gtx 1070 was benchmarking better than the gtx 980 and even better than the 980 ti on many benchmarks. Yeah the SLI vid was pretty strange. I'm surprised the guys that have 2 of each (1080 and 1070) in hand don't test them against each other. Edited June 12, 2016 by FireFox500 1 PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
joey45 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 You can have the best GFX card money can buy but.... it all depends on the game engine and how optimised it... 2 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Hadwell Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 You can have the best GFX card money can buy but.... it all depends on the game engine and how optimised it... 1/3 true... the most optimized game in the world will run like crap with a bad gpu is the 2nd, and the best GPU with the most optimized game will run bad if there's a bottleneck anywhere else, so having the best gpu money can buy solves 1 problem of many. 2 My youtube channel Remember: the fun is in the fight, not the kill, so say NO! to the AIM-120. System specs:ROG Maximus XI Hero, Intel I9 9900K, 32GB 3200MHz ram, EVGA 1080ti FTW3, Samsung 970 EVO 1TB NVME, 27" Samsung SA350 1080p, 27" BenQ GW2765HT 1440p, ASUS ROG PG278Q 1440p G-SYNC Controls: Saitekt rudder pedals,Virpil MongoosT50 throttle, warBRD base, CM2 stick, TrackIR 5+pro clip, WMR VR headset. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FireFox500 Posted June 13, 2016 Author Posted June 13, 2016 1/3 true... the most optimized game in the world will run like crap with a bad gpu is the 2nd, and the best GPU with the most optimized game will run bad if there's a bottleneck anywhere else, so having the best gpu money can buy solves 1 problem of many. I plan on buying a 6700K or equivalent down the line to feed an SLI config so I don't think there would be much of a bottleneck (although I'm not sure as bottlenecks are a newer concept to me) Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
FireFox500 Posted June 13, 2016 Author Posted June 13, 2016 You can have the best GFX card money can buy but.... it all depends on the game engine and how optimised it... I only really play DCS or war thunder which aren't too graphically intensive so I should be fine Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
SkateZilla Posted June 13, 2016 Posted June 13, 2016 That is just on one monitor though correct? I've got a 980 and I run 5760x1080 but because its triple 1920x1080 it doesn't go over the limit right? Per output I think, but that's a 16:10 Resolution, even if it was simply a Bandwidth issue, you'd be safe, Direct X also has a maximum Resolution, as does DX11, but you should be well withing those still... I ran 6 displays 1080p at 1440 Over sampled no problem on my 7970s 5120x3200x60-8bpp Bandwidth Per Channel 9.83 Gbps Total Signal Bandwidth 29.49 Gbps 5160x1080x60-8bpp: Bandwidth Per Channel 3.73 Gbps Total Signal Bandwidth 11.20 Gbps Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
FireFox500 Posted June 13, 2016 Author Posted June 13, 2016 Per output I think, but that's a 16:10 Resolution, even if it was simply a Bandwidth issue, you'd be safe, Direct X also has a maximum Resolution, as does DX11, but you should be well withing those still... I ran 6 displays 1080p at 1440 Over sampled no problem on my 7970s 5120x3200x60-8bpp Bandwidth Per Channel 9.83 Gbps Total Signal Bandwidth 29.49 Gbps 5160x1080x60-8bpp: Bandwidth Per Channel 3.73 Gbps Total Signal Bandwidth 11.20 Gbps Are those numbers in GigaBITS or GigaBYTES per second? Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
SkateZilla Posted June 13, 2016 Posted June 13, 2016 Are those numbers in GigaBITS or GigaBYTES per second? Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk Gbps stands for billions of bits per second and is a measure of bandwidth on a digital data transmission medium Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
FireFox500 Posted June 13, 2016 Author Posted June 13, 2016 Gbps stands for billions of bits per second and is a measure of bandwidth on a digital data transmission medium Ah! A lower case b means gigabit, a capital B is a gigabyte, bytes are bigger than bits so I think you are talking about gigabytes? Or am i wrong? I see on youtube Linus Tech Tips always differentiates heavily between the 2 but I can never tell which one is used when. PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU
Hadwell Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) When talking about bandwidth, as in... the bandwidth of an HDMI or display port, or network, its bits. When talking about storage, how much space something has, it's bytes. the smallest amount of space it takes for one text character. Edited June 14, 2016 by Hadwell My youtube channel Remember: the fun is in the fight, not the kill, so say NO! to the AIM-120. System specs:ROG Maximus XI Hero, Intel I9 9900K, 32GB 3200MHz ram, EVGA 1080ti FTW3, Samsung 970 EVO 1TB NVME, 27" Samsung SA350 1080p, 27" BenQ GW2765HT 1440p, ASUS ROG PG278Q 1440p G-SYNC Controls: Saitekt rudder pedals,Virpil MongoosT50 throttle, warBRD base, CM2 stick, TrackIR 5+pro clip, WMR VR headset. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts