toni Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 So ED guys, given that a Nimitz + Ad. Kuznetsov are under construction, and LNS has the Forrestal CV WIP , what do you think about this as a future project ?
Silver_Dragon Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 The main problem of a Yak-38 has the lack of info to build a module. But a Kiev cruiser has not bad to a forrestal CV. Require new Ka-25, Ka-27 and Ka-29 Helicopters and M-11 Shtorm, SUW-N-1 and 21" Torpedoes 3D models. For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Gierasimov Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Very nice So ED guys, given that a Nimitz + Ad. Kuznetsov are under construction, and LNS has the Forrestal CV WIP , what do you think about this as a future project ? I am not into ships but looks very nice. When will you have this ready by you say? Intel Ultra 9 285K :: ROG STRIX Z890-A GAMING WIFI :: Kingston Fury 64GB :: MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X Trio :: VKB Gunfighter MK.III MCG Ultimate :: VPC MongoosT-50 CM3 :: non-VR :: single player :: open beta
Aginor Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 I love those cruisers. They look big and mean. Btw, that's the Baku, later renamed Admiral Gorshkov, now known as the INS Vikramaditya. DCSW weapons cheat sheet speed cheat sheet
toni Posted September 26, 2016 Author Posted September 26, 2016 Was an idea for ED developers, or any other team . Pretty old vessel, but could be ok.
aairon Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Maybe you should start with something that isn't permanently listing toward port like this one. ;-) Flying sims since 1980 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Mobo: Asus Z170 Pro Gaming CPU: i7 6700K @ 4.7 GHz Video: EVGA GTX 1080 Ram: Patriot DDR4 2800 8GBx2 PWR:Corsair RM750i
Gierasimov Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Right.. Was an idea for ED developers, or any other team . Pretty old vessel, but could be ok. Good stuff, I think they (ED Devs) seldom visit this forum though, that's for one, secondly I see other areas in which DCS and its modules can expand or otherwise improve. If you look at what is said to be WIP right now form both ED and 3rd parties I think it is a huge amount of resources, time and material to deliver "just" what's already in the pipeline. Having said that, I think that upon final product delivery (and that is a long way itself) there will be still some of the stuff that will need improvement and fine-tuning. Also, try to keep in mind that it takes TIME to deliver open alpha / beta versions already and putting such ideas forward feels a bit inappropriate, hence why I chose to post this reply. This is my and MY only opinion and I mean no offence whatsoever. If only money was no object... Intel Ultra 9 285K :: ROG STRIX Z890-A GAMING WIFI :: Kingston Fury 64GB :: MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X Trio :: VKB Gunfighter MK.III MCG Ultimate :: VPC MongoosT-50 CM3 :: non-VR :: single player :: open beta
toni Posted December 14, 2016 Author Posted December 14, 2016 Talking about the Kuznetsov development DLC, will this HIGH VISIBLE TRAIL be accurately modeled ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRVhCl02ssk
Recommended Posts