Jump to content

Want another Lock On 1.2 delay because of new 3D models for jets?  

118 members have voted

  1. 1. Want another Lock On 1.2 delay because of new 3D models for jets?



Recommended Posts

Posted

I like a AFM for the MiG-29S! This desire arrives at late! :D

 

Regards

Best Regards

Viper

sigpic3353_7.gif

System: Intel Core i7-4790, 3,6GHz, 16GB RAM, 128GB SSD, 2TB HDD, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB GDDR5,

TM HOTAS Warthog;(MSFFB2 for testing); TrackIR4 +Track Clip Pro; Windows 10 Pro.

Posted

YESSSS!!! Let's the best sim become even more better!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

летаю на заказ, дорого...

"The FlankerForce"© -=приостановлено=-

Лучшее средство завоевания господства в воздухе - танк посередине ВПП © не установлено

АХТУНГ! эксперды атакуют!

Только отсутствие разведанных запасов нефти в Антарктиде, удерживает пингвинов от демократии.

Posted
I chose "NO" because models can be added at any time not just before release.

 

My point exactly! Walmis' F-15 is a very good example of that. With the release of the 3D plugins now some very talented 3D artist have their hands free to create true art that can be added to the sim with a single mouse click. So my answer is "NO".

"See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89.

=RvE=

Posted
Imagine, Black Shark's finished, all the code's in place, polished . . . . .

 

I do imagine that every morning, unfortunatly I wake up a few minutes after but it was a nice dream.;)

Intel 5820k | Asus X-99A | Crucial 16GB | Powercolor Devil RX580 8GB | Win 10 x64 | Oculus Rift | https://gallery.ksotov.co.uk

Patiently waiting for: DCS: Panavia Tornado, DCS: SA-2 Guideline, DCS: SA-3 Goa, DCS: S-300 Grumble

Posted
Oh heck /no/. We do -not- fly as the rest of you would like to. Where'd you get that idea? :P

 

If you flew BS like we do, you'd be all over these forums posting bug this and bug that. That's what Beta testing is about.

 

Yea we witness the post-release bugs too, we just let them slide as matter-of-course it seems.

 

Imagine, Black Shark's finished, all the code's in place, polished . . . . .

 

Wow, ed have really turned their methodology around. Are you sure this is going to be accurate?

Posted

I dont care about external 3D models, I´m in pit flying 99,99% of my Lomac time.

Voted NO, the only reasons I would accept BS delay for are AFM, clickable pits, improved avionics, 6 DOF pits and DC.

For those I would even wait another year or two for BS release.

All else ain´t worth the time right now for me.

"For aviators like us, the sky is not the limit - it's our home!"

Posted

Thanks for all the votes and explanations behind them.

I've voted Yes, because if 1.2 release slips because they want to finish extra models, there's always more time to squish extra bugs ;) And I'm no longer in hurry... since I've waited sooo long already :P *I'm now such a hypocrite, I know*

51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-)

100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-)

 

:: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky

tail# 44 or 444

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...