TucksonSonny Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 And it has dual R-77 mounts between the engines, nice (LOPE meint h4x) As a result the su-35 monster can carry 12 R77’s (RVV-AE) :gun_smilie: DELL Intel® Core™ i7 Processor 940 2,93 GHz @3 GHz, 8 MB cache | 8.192 MB 1.067 MHz Tri Channel DDR3 | 512 MB ATI® Radeon™ 4850 | 500 GB 7200 rpm Serial ATA | Samsung SM 2693 HM 25.5 " | HOTAS Cougar Thrustmaster |
Pilotasso Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 And it has dual R-77 mounts between the engines, nice (LOPE meint h4x) And it still has a 'crappy' IRST system with a 60 degree gimbal limit, the new (really new, not upgraded) one of the mig-35 has a 90 degree gimbal limit. A nice plane, too bad the engine development is lagging even more behind today. Let's hope Al-41s successor will be competative. I mean the engines are good for their time, but it seems like the al-31 series has reached its maximum potential. You guys crack me up. You "hope it gets better" but then those planes are to be sold to potentialy dangerous nations. :D We are already looking at Algeria with raised eyebrows. I dont want it to be any better than it is right now. .
tflash Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 Does the F-22 not already have this feature? :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Force_Feedback Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 You guys crack me up. You "hope it gets better" but then those planes are to be sold to potentialy dangerous nations. :D We are already looking at Algeria with raised eyebrows. I dont want it to be any better than it is right now. I don't give a damn who makes or buys the plane, if the thing looks nice, flies well and does that cheap then it's a good thing, no matter who made it. As long as they won't bother me, they can blow each other up several dozen times, and I don't care who starts, be it the US, Malawi or Lichtenstein, just as long as they kill/rape (no nukes, fall-out reaches everywhere)/blow-up/behead eachother, I don't give a flying nut who is good or evil. If people can't solve issues in a normal way, then they deserve to die. That plane looks nice, but I like it more sans canopy :P Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
Fox One Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 When selling those planes to other nations, there should be a hidden disable switch programmed in with the plane's software. Then the nation who sold the plane can fly in the vicinity, send out the disable command and shut the plane off in mid flight. :D Believe it or not, this has actually happened with a certain soviet-built SA missiles system, where there was such a hidden remote command blocking-system. There were countries using soviet equipment the soviets just didn't trusted... I can't give the link for the info, but trust me, I know from a very reliable source ;) My DCS videos
ED Team Groove Posted May 31, 2007 ED Team Posted May 31, 2007 Believe it or not, this has actually happened with a certain soviet-built SA missiles system, where there was such a hidden remote command blocking-system. There were countries using soviet equipment the soviets just didn't trusted... I can't give the link for the info, but trust me, I know from a very reliable source ;) And you will understand that i dont believe this. Our Forum Rules: http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en
Fox One Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 And you will understand that i dont believe this. Surely do... Your father didn't worked for 32 years on russian built air defence radars ;) My DCS videos
Recommended Posts