Included liveries?

[Tarabostes]

Just a little advice about Romanian skin and the stars position,especially on the wings .

Edited January 24, 2019 by Tarabostes

[HAE5904]

Just a little advice about Romanian skin and the stars position,especially on the wings .

I only use photographs as reference, not scale models.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[HAE5904]

Speaking of the Czechoslovak livery... just seen this on the internets...

 

 

 

:D

 

 

 

Just saying but... why do people have tendency to switch the blue and red? Not the first time I've seen it...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remember kids, Blue always forward, red either down or inwards.

 

 

 

Well kid, the b/w photographs did show the red part differently on the vertical tail for that particular skin. But to comfort the Czechs, I already fixed it.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Tarabostes]

"I only use photographs as reference, not scale models. "

 

 

 

 

I want to show that Romanian migs (Mig-15/17/19/21/23) till 1986 dont have stars on top of the wings.

[HAE5904]

"I only use photographs as reference, not scale models. "

 

 

 

 

I want to show that Romanian migs (Mig-15/17/19/21/23) till 1986 dont have stars on top of the wings.

Do you have photographic evidence?

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Akatsuki]

Can you please make sure that the soviet skins are available not just to Russia but to USSR as well?

[HAE5904]

Can you please make sure that the soviet skins are available not just to Russia but to USSR as well?

?? Soviet = USSR = Russia. This may answer your not so clear question.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[AeriaGloria]

If this is true why did Ukraine end up with Tu-160s that they had to give back? Why did so many countries share the leftover Sukhoi and MiGs? Many countries were part of the USSR. While it’s simple to write it off as Russia since they are the biggest and most powerful it denies the contributions of many nations.

For example, Antonov was a Soviet manufacturer, but geographically they are part of Ukraine. So while Russia still uses Antonov airplanes, Antonov would never sell them a plane again. There was also many airplane factories that were soviet but were not Russian upon USSR breakup, such as Tbilisi causing a huge pause in Russian aerospace in the 90s as they figured out how to do everything without Ukrainians and Georgians. And the Czech. The L-39 is Czech not Russian despite having been a Soviet airplane.

 

 

I wonder how many export skins we will get. Eqypt or even Shenyang version.

[spiddx]

?? Soviet = USSR = Russia. This may answer your not so clear question.

[Zeus67]

Can you please make sure that the soviet skins are available not just to Russia but to USSR as well?

 

The default livery, which is a V-PVO aircraft, is available to all countries. There is a specific USSR/Russian livery that belongs to the VVS.

[HAE5904]

USSR is the Soviet Union,, Russia in the pic should be referred as CIS, in other words, the Russia AFTER the demise of the Warchau -Pact & USSR.

 

Don't you ever had history lessons?

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

Edited January 29, 2019 by HAE5904

[HAE5904]

If this is true why did Ukraine end up with Tu-160s that they had to give back? Why did so many countries share the leftover Sukhoi and MiGs? Many countries were part of the USSR. While it’s simple to write it off as Russia since they are the biggest and most powerful it denies the contributions of many nations.

For example, Antonov was a Soviet manufacturer, but geographically they are part of Ukraine. So while Russia still uses Antonov airplanes, Antonov would never sell them a plane again. There was also many airplane factories that were soviet but were not Russian upon USSR breakup, such as Tbilisi causing a huge pause in Russian aerospace in the 90s as they figured out how to do everything without Ukrainians and Georgians. And the Czech. The L-39 is Czech not Russian despite having been a Soviet airplane.

 

 

I wonder how many export skins we will get. Eqypt or even Shenyang version.

Wow, history ain't your thing is it? Ukraine was in time of the USSR part of it, and only became independent when the USSR/Warchau-Pact dissolved. So, being Warchau-Pact all equipment were provided as an unified USSR to defend themselves. This also answer your L-39 question, the trainer was developed as a Warchau-Pact basic/advanced trainer, no matter where it originated, as long as it was part of the Soviet Union / USSR / Warchau-Pact. That's why it is usually referred to as a Russian plane, as Russia was the big boss of the the USSR/Warchau-Pact.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Akatsuki]

In the mission editor you can chose both USSR or Russia, my request is quite simple: edit description.lua file of each soviet liveries so they can be selected as USSR in the mission editor. It’s a very easy edit though so i guess i will have to do it myself, no big deal...

Edited January 29, 2019 by Akatsuki

[spiddx]

Don't you ever had history lessons?

Says the guy who wrote:

USSR = Russia

:lol: Good one!

 

No need to lecture anyone here when you are the only one who doesn't understand Akatsuki's request.

[Vincent90]

HAE5904, the question stems from the fact that the USSR wasn't a faction in DCS until recently. Aircraft modules that were made before that faction came into existence were simply thrown into the "Russia" faction.

 

However, after the "USSR" faction came into existence, ED/devs never bothered to include soviet weapons to the USSR, causing the USSR to miss the liveries of the MiG-15bis, MiG-21, Mi-8, etc, etc...

 

If you want to make a Cold War mission with the MiG-15, you HAVE to choose Russia as a faction or else you get the default (North Korean) livery.

[HAE5904]

Says the guy who wrote:

 

Good one!

 

No need to lecture anyone here when you are the only one who doesn't understand Akatsuki's request.

LOL, then YOU simply don't understand the answer I gave, you're mixing up different posts dude... Read before you give any reply.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[HAE5904]

HAE5904, the question stems from the fact that the USSR wasn't a faction in DCS until recently. Aircraft modules that were made before that faction came into existence were simply thrown into the "Russia" faction.

 

However, after the "USSR" faction came into existence, ED/devs never bothered to include soviet weapons to the USSR, causing the USSR to miss the liveries of the MiG-15bis, MiG-21, Mi-8, etc, etc...

 

If you want to make a Cold War mission with the MiG-15, you HAVE to choose Russia as a faction or else you get the default (North Korean) livery.

I know, I only replied to his picture explaining the difference, as he only posted the pics, without any explaining text.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Volator]

However, after the "USSR" faction came into existence, ED/devs never bothered to include soviet weapons to the USSR,

 

... and if you edit the country.lua and add the equipment for USSR, you will fail MP integrity check... Been there, done that... :(

[HAE5904]

... and if you edit the country.lua and add the equipment for USSR, you will fail MP integrity check... Been there, done that... :(

Yes, that's one thing ED needs to fix.

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-N9005 met Tapatalk

[Fisherman82]

I would just love it if they would unlock everything for every nation. No more problems with stuff not beeing available for a certain nation dispite it beeing so in real life.

 

Skickat från min D5503 via Tapatalk

[Dehuman]

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off topic

 

If this is true why did Ukraine end up with Tu-160s that they had to give back? ....Antonov was a Soviet manufacturer, but geographically they are part of Ukraine. So while Russia still uses Antonov airplanes, Antonov would never sell them a plane again.....

 

They didn't have to give them back, they sold them to Russia. The USA was paying Ukraine to scrap them at the time as Ukraine neither had a need for them nor the funds to keep them.

 

Also Antonov may have found itself a Ukrainian company after the dissolution of the USSR but it's not where it's roots are

 

The company was established in 1946 at the Novosibirsk Aircraft Production Association as the top-secret Soviet Research and Design Bureau No. 153. It was headed by Oleg Antonov and specialised in turboprop military transport aircraft.

 

Antonov was born on 7 February 1906 in Troitsy (now Podolsky District of the Moscow Oblast)

[portman]

And the Czech. The L-39 is Czech not Russian despite having been a Soviet airplane.

Soviet airplane? Former Czechoslovakia, were the L-39 was built, was not part of the Soviet Union. It was a member of the Warsaw pact though.

[AeriaGloria]

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaay off topic

 

 

 

They didn't have to give them back, they sold them to Russia. The USA was paying Ukraine to scrap them at the time as Ukraine neither had a need for them nor the funds to keep them.

 

Also Antonov may have found itself a Ukrainian company after the dissolution of the USSR but it's not where it's roots are

You are correct. I should’ve kept my post short and thought it out more, especially about how the Tu-160s were transferred, I apologize

 

Soviet airplane? Former Czechoslovakia, were the L-39 was built, was not part of the Soviet Union. It was a member of the Warsaw pact though.

 

I was referring to the fact that the USSR were operators of it but you are right I should have phrased it better or not at all.

 

And I am so sorry to everyone here for derailing this thread, I’ll keep it short and on topic in the future.

 

Also thank you very much Zeus for confirming what the OP was asking about, can’t wait until we can fly her