Nealius Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 I've been noticing much worse in-cockpit performance in the Tomcat than in any other jets, specifically in VR, and specifically when on the ground. In this case, empty tarmac at Maykop. I set all my graphics settings to low and I'm still stuck at 30fps on the ground, despite having 45fps in external view. Once in the air I'm at 45 in the cockpit as well, so it's only when on the ground that performance is bad. Now, here's the interesting part. If I turn off the HUD or VDI, my frames jump from 30 up to around high-30s or 40. If I turn off BOTH my HUD and VDI, my frames go to 40-45. Is anyone else experiencing the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sLYFa Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 Same here, turning off the displays gives a noticable fps boost i5-8600k @4.9Ghz, 2080ti , 32GB@2666Mhz, 512GB SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strikeeagle345 Posted May 28, 2019 Share Posted May 28, 2019 I've been noticing much worse in-cockpit performance in the Tomcat than in any other jets, specifically in VR, and specifically when on the ground. In this case, empty tarmac at Maykop. I set all my graphics settings to low and I'm still stuck at 30fps on the ground, despite having 45fps in external view. Once in the air I'm at 45 in the cockpit as well, so it's only when on the ground that performance is bad. Now, here's the interesting part. If I turn off the HUD or VDI, my frames jump from 30 up to around high-30s or 40. If I turn off BOTH my HUD and VDI, my frames go to 40-45. Is anyone else experiencing the same? I was until i upgraded my CPU and the support HW. Now I get around 45 on the ground in that area with the displays / HUD on. Strike USLANTCOM.com i7-9700K OC 5GHz| MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON | 32GB DDR4 3200 | GTX 3090 | Samsung SSD | HP Reverb G2 | VIRPIL Alpha | VIRPIL Blackhawk | HOTAS Warthog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nealius Posted May 29, 2019 Author Share Posted May 29, 2019 It's strange that the HUD and VDI would be eating so much CPU while the HUD/TGP/Mav images in all the other jets don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mukai92 Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 I'm still having this issue with FPS with displays on. Hornet gets about 45FPS with all displays on in a busy mission on the tarmac. The Tomcat gets 45FPS in cold and dark on the tarmac in the same mission. But as soon as its started and the displays come to life I get about 30FPS or worse in most cases :/ Hopefully there's a fix because its making for a bad experience on take-off and landing, the low FPS is really giving me headaches :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VampireNZ Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 Good to know - will be turning off all displays on the ground for now, as VR really struggles while taxiing etc. Asus Maximus VIII Hero Alpha| i7-6700K @ 4.60GHz | nVidia GTX 1080ti Strix OC 11GB @ 2075MHz| 16GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 CL14 | Samsung 950 PRO 512GB M.2 SSD | Corsair Force LE 480GB SSD | Windows 10 64-Bit | TM Warthog with FSSB R3 Lighting Base | VKB Gunfighter Pro + MCG | TM MFD's | Oculus Rift S | Jetseat FSE [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mukai92 Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 Good to know - will be turning off all displays on the ground for now, as VR really struggles while taxiing etc. Yeah give it a go, I try to taxi and takeoff with displays off for now. I need to experiment with carrier (ICLS) approaches tho, HUD is pretty handy for those and I've yet to test and see if the HUD has as big an impact on performance Hoping for a fix soon (as I say the hornet is getting a stable 45fps on the ground with all displays and HUD on) so for now its just a pain for the F14 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts