arparso Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Resolution: 2560x1440 Everything on minimum or off if possible, except the following: Textures – High, Terrain Textures – High, Visib. range - high, Res. Of cockpit Displays: 1024EF, Preload raidus: 60500, Anisotropic filtering: 16x,[x] Full Screen, [x] Scale GUI As you can see I’m probably (and hopefully) GPU bottlenecked, and difference between 6 y.o. setup is not big. The way I measured it is I recorded a track(Caucasus map), where your location gets shot by MLRS after some time (which causes fps drop). Camera motions and plane motions in the track are the same (or close to being so I hope). All I did after is played track 3 times and averaged the values (I start playing the track by pressing pause and about half second later I press the button to record benchmark data with MSI afterburner for 3m:16s). I will attach the track I used (you need su-25A or flaming cliffs 3 to play it). In first day of installation 3700x performance was actually worse in 1% lows by 10 fps, but today Ryzen gods had mercy and made it slightly better. Thanks for doing this and providing the track. I'm thinking about going Ryzen, too, so I am always eager to see other people's results in DCS. For comparison's sake, I ran your track file with the same settings on my PC: CPU: i7 4790K @ 4.4GHz RAM: 16GB DDR3-2400 (CL 11-13-13-31) GPU: Gainward GTX 1080 GLH Average FPS is obviously very different (mostly due to GPU, I guess: 1080 vs 1060). Interesting to see how your 0.1% on the Ryzen is quite a bit better despite the weaker GPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DackSter94 Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 (edited) Average FPS is obviously very different (mostly due to GPU, I guess: 1080 vs 1060). Interesting to see how your 0.1% on the Ryzen is quite a bit better despite the weaker GPU. Thing is i run tracks 3 times in a row for an average number , I think second and third tracks always get better performance in low 0.1% because probably less load stutters. I didn't get 2080Ti as i was planning and instead went for 2070S, which is probably bit closer to 1080. I only run test once (not 3 times like others, which will probably give better results) and i got these numbers: 53.6, 96.3, 169.8 (0.1%L, 1%L, Av) I also tweaked memory settings with ryzen DRAM calculator which allowed better latency. Edited August 18, 2019 by DackSter94 LOOK MA, NO HOOK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 (edited) Old setup: CPU: i5 3570k OC (boosts up to 4.2GHz) RAM: 24GB DDR3-1866 (CL 10-11-10) GPU (same): Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB New setup: CPU: Ryzen 3700x Stock (boosts to 4.3GHz+) RAM: 32GB DDR4-3600 (CL 17-19-19) GPU (same): Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB Game settings: Resolution: 2560x1440 Everything on minimum or off if possible, except the following: Textures – High, Terrain Textures – High, Visib. range - high, Res. Of cockpit Displays: 1024EF, Preload raidus: 60500, Anisotropic filtering: 16x,[x] Full Screen, [x] Scale GUI Reshade: Default Lumasharpen and HDR effects on. As you can see I’m probably (and hopefully) GPU bottlenecked, and difference between 6 y.o. setup is not big. The way I measured it is I recorded a track(Caucasus map), where your location gets shot by MLRS after some time (which causes fps drop). Camera motions and plane motions in the track are the same (or close to being so I hope). All I did after is played track 3 times and averaged the values (I start playing the track by pressing pause and about half second later I press the button to record benchmark data with MSI afterburner for 3m:16s). I will attach the track I used (you need su-25A or flaming cliffs 3 to play it). In first day of installation 3700x performance was actually worse in 1% lows by 10 fps, but today Ryzen gods had mercy and made it slightly better. Thanks for doing this and providing the track. I'm thinking about going Ryzen, too, so I am always eager to see other people's results in DCS. For comparison's sake, I ran your track file with the same settings on my PC: CPU: i7 4790K @ 4.4GHz RAM: 16GB DDR3-2400 (CL 11-13-13-31) GPU: Gainward GTX 1080 GLH Average FPS is obviously very different (mostly due to GPU, I guess: 1080 vs 1060). Interesting to see how your 0.1% on the Ryzen is quite a bit better despite the weaker GPU. Thing is i run tracks 3 times in a row for an average number , I think second and third tracks always get better performance in low 0.1% because probably less load stutters. I didn't get 2080Ti as i was planning and instead went for 2070S, which is probably bit closer to 1080. I only run test once (not 3 times like others, which will probably give better results) and i got these numbers: 53.6, 96.3, 169.8 (0.1%L, 1%L, Av) I also tweaked memory settings with ryzen DRAM calculator which allowed better latency. Heres my imput with same conditions: Look what happens when DackSter94 changed from a 1060 to a 2070 Super on his 3700X (both results shown). Conclusion: You can clearly see that the average FPS scales linearly with GPU (1080Ti is nearly 2X 1060 and 25% faster than 1080), 0.1% FPS may be linked to CPU providing no other bottleneck is introduced (like RAM shortage). If you have a modern CPU, a good GPU is more important. Bear in mind that when VULKAN implementation is complete it may change alot, for example by making DCS use more cores.Benchmark.txt Edited August 24, 2019 by Pilotasso [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DackSter94 Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Conclusion: You can clearly see that the average FPS scales linearly with GPU (1080Ti is nearly 2X 1060 and 25% faster than 1080), 0.1% FPS may be linked to CPU providing no other bottleneck is introduced (like RAM shortage). If you have a modern CPU, a good GPU is more important. Bear in mind that when VULKAN implementation is complete it may change alot, for example by making DCS use more cores. Nice work putting it together. After my first test i realised that my memory wasn't running on 17 CL. Bios took odd number and makes it even above(18). But that was for tests on gtx 1060. For my 2070s test I used ryzen dram calculator to calculate timings. So timings for RAM I used and use now with 2070s are 16-19-20. Although I doubt this change affects much. LOOK MA, NO HOOK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petsild Posted August 25, 2019 Share Posted August 25, 2019 This is my last measured results when overclock to 4.7 GHz. - 2k resolution - Without mirrors DCS.exe benchmark completed, 35280 frames rendered in 198.916 s Average framerate : 177.3 FPS Minimum framerate : 103.3 FPS Maximum framerate : 268.1 FPS 1% low framerate : 99.3 FPS 0.1% low framerate : 50.0 FPS MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4, Kingston 3600 MHz 64 Gb, i5 12600K, Gigabyte RTX 4090, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus,VKB NXT Premium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitMaster Posted August 28, 2019 Share Posted August 28, 2019 Measure your RAM latency with AIDA64. There should be 2-5ns gains from 19 to 16 primary timings. I got down to 48ns from 57ns, 3000CL16-16-16-38 to 3200CL14-14-14-34. Test your RAM thoroughly if you tune them. I suggest IBTv2.6, prime95v26.6 and AIDA64. Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk 1 Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Asus 1080ti EK-waterblock - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB9I3uCT Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 Hey I have upgraded my system to 10700KF. Where can I download a benchmark to test it? Sorry for bad English, I am writing via google translate) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitMaster Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 (edited) Benchmark: 3DMark via Steam https://store.steampowered.com/ Passmark https://www.passmark.com/ Stability Tests: Intel Burn Test IBT v2.6 https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/intelburntest.html prime95 https://www.mersenne.org/download/ Aida64 https://www.aida64.com/ if you know Linux, I recommend stressapptest from Google, available via most Software Management Tools Ultimative Test: 14+ days no reboot and no BSOD Edited August 9, 2021 by BitMaster 1 Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Asus 1080ti EK-waterblock - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB9I3uCT Posted August 13, 2021 Share Posted August 13, 2021 09.08.2021 в 22:34, BitMaster сказал: Benchmark: 3DMark via Steam https://store.steampowered.com/ Passmark https://www.passmark.com/ Stability Tests: Intel Burn Test IBT v2.6 https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/intelburntest.html prime95 https://www.mersenne.org/download/ Aida64 https://www.aida64.com/ if you know Linux, I recommend stressapptest from Google, available via most Software Management Tools Ultimative Test: 14+ days no reboot and no BSOD Thank you very much, comrade! But I'm talking about the tests in DCS that people run here to get a table like this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitMaster Posted August 14, 2021 Share Posted August 14, 2021 (edited) Oh well, that is Hand Made with lots of sweat & time. There is no app or modus that will let you measure DCS' performance. You have to dial the settings in by hand, try to fly the same path etc. every time, note the fps and then rinse & repeat with a new setting, new GPU, faster RAM, etc etc... As you can see, if you have a normal life & maybe a family on top, you dont have the time usually to do that. Also, with that many changes happening the value of such graphs are rendered useless after a few months. New GPU drivers, DCS' updates and new modules, newer Win10 Build, Win11 soon, etc etc.. I test it on my system with my settings and that counts for my experience. If it has too little fps I know I have to tune LOD down etc... Graphs from others are only a rough Guide what to expect, it only takes a little overseen setting to ruin it all. Edited August 14, 2021 by BitMaster Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Asus 1080ti EK-waterblock - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts