yar Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 there wont be a BS for lock on -> its a own game now Since the Amraam flies slowerand: you can fire a R77 earlier, because its flying faster. for example: (all launches at same conditions!) 10 seconds after the launch: the R77 is 7846,4 m away from launchposition the aim-120 is 7119,18 m away 20 seconds: R77: 14176,27m aim-120: 12751,77m 30 seconds: R77: 17784,31m aim-120: 16263,25m Here you can see it: the aim 120 reaches its max. speed of 3035 kmh after 7 seconds the R 77 reaches its max. speed of 3321 kmh after 8 seconds you can see it here (i know, the graph is not perfekt because 100% right calculations arent possible) It's not that the AMRAAM is So Much Worse, than other missiles,as you can see, the amraam is ;)
tflash Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Yup. It suffices to do a Tacview recording to see the dramatic impact of this on these kinds of engagements. The Amraam's lower speed is out of balance with the rest of the settings (seeker FOV etc.), with known results. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
RvEYoda Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Yar are we playing different games? Because my amraams dont accellerate like that :) S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
yar Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 right. and this should be fixed as fast as possible. F-15 pilots have a big disadvantage with their missiles in lock on :( @ yoda: no, im talking about lock on fc 1.12 o.O how do your missiles accelerate?!? if you have talk about lock on too, its the same. if done 3 or more tests for each missile, always the same conditions and same results
tflash Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 The difference in distance of about 1 mile after 20 seconds is in the context we are talking about extremely relevant and crucial. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
GGTharos Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 That's ... definitely not right. Not at high altitude. ;) If it comes to a merge and nobody is hit on the first head-on, the su-27 SHOULD win, unless the F-15 is significantly lower on fuel or the sukhoi is not carrying missiles. The advantage of the 27 IN THIS CASE (past merge with missiles) also increases with higher altitude if you were wondering ;). No complaints here, this is probably as it should be. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
RvEYoda Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 That's ... definitely not right. Not at high altitude. ;) You know I was actually counting the hours until you would reply EXACTLY this ^^. When saying "is right" my point was everything except the altitude. (that part was just a lockon observation, even though the post sort of says otherwise) Yes the Su-27 should have better instantaneous turn rate than F-15, saying something else doesn't make sense. I can read ur mind GG! Beware :P S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
GGTharos Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Okay, you're getting barcoded. We won't have no psionics running around and causing trouble here untracked ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Rikus Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Very important and easy for 1.13: Add 1680x1050 resolution. Not everybody knows how to edit the file or don´t like to do these things. ----------------- Another thing, change numer of path from 1.13 to 1.14, 13 is the number of bad luck. Greetings
yar Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Another thing, change numer of path from 1.13 to 1.14, 13 is the number of bad luck.good you said this, because: a patch should add the tailnumber 13 there is realy no 13 :doh: 11, 12, 14, 15 ?!? :lol:
tflash Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Amraams kill eachother? I may see things wrong, but I have several acmi files where it seems that if I shoot two Amraam not so long after one another, they manage to destruct eachother. Anyway they just disappear. I can do this trick over and over again BTW, and I realize it accounts for many Amraam engagements (off-line) that go bad. See acmi file in attach. BTW I did wait until both missiles where active before banking away.Amraamskilleachother.zip [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
yar Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 something like this can happen. with lots of luck you also can kill hostile missiles (and maybe yours kill the one of you opponent, but is still flying -> so 1 missile can make 2 kills X-D)
RvEYoda Posted January 20, 2008 Posted January 20, 2008 Okay, you're getting barcoded. We won't have no psionics running around and causing trouble here untracked ;) Be mindful of your feelings, padawan... S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
Red Hammer Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 I remember before ED decide to make BS a independent game, they promised to make AI more clever and more humane. I hope they can keep the promise in the v1.13 In v1.1 the Su-25T and F-18 got new shape, I hope in the v1.13 would have new shapes for all flyable plane. More reality control would be good. Su-25T have a master power switch and it's engines have to be start seperately. I hope it will apply for all flyable plane. All I am trying to say is: I hope lock on can be a BS game without Ka-50 flyable. And the sun, it'll be perfect if it can blind player's eyes. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
luckybob9 Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 Owkay, but when does Black Shark come out? When its ready, of course :smartass: Nevada map contributer EDM Modeling tools FAQ: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1418067&postcount=1 Seo libh a chairde is chanadh liom. Líonaigí'n oíche le greann is le spórt. Seo sláinte na gcarad atá imithe uainn. Mar cheo an tsléibhe uaine, iad imithe go deo
yar Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 I hope in the v1.13 would have new shapes for all flyable plane.would be nice, but this takes lot of time. ED should fix the most important bugs in lock on, not to remake it. but the shapes are done by modders, watch the new f-15, a-10, f-5 etc :)
vliegtuig Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 When its ready, of course :smartass: aah, i allready thougth someting like that :doh:
yar Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 question: Is there a programmer who can make an aplication to add IFF for the f-15? for example a short tone or others. it only should tell you, if you are locking an enemy (so its not a cheat) because if there are 2 jets (and both sides have them) there is no way to find out, which one is your mate... would be nice, if someone could programm something...:helpsmilie:
RvEYoda Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 question: Is there a programmer who can make an aplication to add IFF for the f-15? for example a short tone or others. it only should tell you, if you are locking an enemy (so its not a cheat) because if there are 2 jets (and both sides have them) there is no way to find out, which one is your mate... would be nice, if someone could programm something...:helpsmilie: Hey this should be possible from lua exports, right? Someone out there might be able to figure something out? S = SPARSE(m,n) abbreviates SPARSE([],[],[],m,n,0). This generates the ultimate sparse matrix, an m-by-n all zero matrix. - Matlab help on 'sparse'
Balu Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Hey this should be possible from lua exports, right? Someone out there might be able to figure something out? As far as I know the export values for a locked target have been disabled with FC for export.
Teknetinium Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Su-27 SM would be nice:) or just put 77s on "27s", Tiered of stupid and bad ERs. HELP ED plz :) 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
yar Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Su-27 SM would be nice:) or just put 77s on "27s", Tiered of stupid and bad ERs. HELP ED plz :)none new things, first fix the 'old' But missile fixes include the R-27 too (because SARH are realy stupid :doh:) PS. there wont be a Su-27SM, simply because they entered service in russia ~ 2006. But Lock on is in the time of the cold war As far as I know the export values for a locked target have been disabled with FC for export.if i'm right, there is no way to enable it?
Geier Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 question: Is there a programmer who can make an aplication to add IFF for the f-15? for example a short tone or others. it only should tell you, if you are locking an enemy (so its not a cheat) because if there are 2 jets (and both sides have them) there is no way to find out, which one is your mate... would be nice, if someone could programm something...:helpsmilie: Why it should be a tone or smthg like it??? In real life Eagles have a cross "big X" so we need just an application or marking
Recommended Posts