Bojanglez Posted April 7 Posted April 7 vor 2 Stunden schrieb hannibal: i just loaded all the carriers in one file.. so same conditions what kind of rig do u have and what software to u pull telemetry from? @Bojanglez Yaw 2 Pro Yaw Game Engine / Game Link
hannibal Posted April 7 Posted April 7 (edited) 6 hours ago, Bojanglez said: Yaw 2 Pro Yaw Game Engine / Game Link i had yaw 1... if i recall, there was an yaw emulator application, so u can visually see telemetry behavior without having to run the physical yaw chair... to help you see oscillations with out having to take a chance in damaging your hardware @Bojanglez Edited April 7 by hannibal 1 find me on steam! username: Hannibal_A101A http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197969447179
Bojanglez Posted April 7 Posted April 7 vor 7 Stunden schrieb hannibal: i had yaw 1... if i recall, there was an yaw emulator application, so u can visually see telemetry behavior without having to run the physical yaw chair... to help you see oscillations with out having to take a chance in damaging your hardware @Bojanglez Ya. Thats what Im using. 1
BrassEm Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 (edited) G'day Hannibal, So many thanks to your findings, I have been catching up on much lost time. It is such a relief to hook up without fear of the rig breaking shakes. I have just been flying the Washington with all sorts of stupid alignments for the shot, and it all works good. I understand that the Forrestal will be different because that is a HeatBlur product, but I don't understand why 3 out of the 5 ED carriers are broken. From a programmers point of view they should all be accessing the same code? If the code is supposed to be the same for all, then it is a simple matter of comparing code and looking for the differences. I am sure it will be a matter of a wrong character typed in, or missing in the code, somewhere when integrating it into the last 3 carrier's. So I believe at this point in time for us motion rig users that use surge, the following carriers are broken and out of bounds until fixed. CVN-71 Theodore Roosevelt CVN-74 John C Stennis CVN-75 Harry S. Truman I have included a graph of a good working cat shot with surge and nose gear suspension deflection. The surge has been blunted with a 200hz notch filter in the export.lua in my futile attempt to remove the shakes. I can take it out now and get a crisper launch profile. Edited April 11 by BrassEm 1 www.brass-em.com
hannibal Posted April 12 Posted April 12 (edited) 16 hours ago, BrassEm said: G'day Hannibal, So many thanks to your findings, I have been catching up on much lost time. It is such a relief to hook up without fear of the rig breaking shakes. I have just been flying the Washington with all sorts of stupid alignments for the shot, and it all works good. I understand that the Forrestal will be different because that is a HeatBlur product, but I don't understand why 3 out of the 5 ED carriers are broken. From a programmers point of view they should all be accessing the same code? If the code is supposed to be the same for all, then it is a simple matter of comparing code and looking for the differences. I am sure it will be a matter of a wrong character typed in, or missing in the code, somewhere when integrating it into the last 3 carrier's. So I believe at this point in time for us motion rig users that use surge, the following carriers are broken and out of bounds until fixed. CVN-71 Theodore Roosevelt CVN-74 John C Stennis CVN-75 Harry S. Truman I have included a graph of a good working cat shot with surge and nose gear suspension deflection. The surge has been blunted with a 200hz notch filter in the export.lua in my futile attempt to remove the shakes. I can take it out now and get a crisper launch profile. trying to see what you are showing us here.. which carrier is depicted in your telemetry viewer? share us video of your rig with a desirable cat shot! so CVN-71 Theodore Roosevelt, CVN-74 John C Stennis, CVN-75 Harry S. Truman needs investigating on the surge export! though i hope to test my highly filtered profile for these problematic carriers... Edited April 12 by hannibal 2 find me on steam! username: Hannibal_A101A http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197969447179
hannibal Posted April 21 Posted April 21 today i launched from roosevelt with accepable results from my adjusted filter. hope to make video again show launch from all six carriers 1 find me on steam! username: Hannibal_A101A http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197969447179
Bojanglez Posted April 28 Posted April 28 Am 11.4.2025 um 23:55 schrieb BrassEm: G'day Hannibal, So many thanks to your findings, I have been catching up on much lost time. It is such a relief to hook up without fear of the rig breaking shakes. I have just been flying the Washington with all sorts of stupid alignments for the shot, and it all works good. I understand that the Forrestal will be different because that is a HeatBlur product, but I don't understand why 3 out of the 5 ED carriers are broken. From a programmers point of view they should all be accessing the same code? If the code is supposed to be the same for all, then it is a simple matter of comparing code and looking for the differences. I am sure it will be a matter of a wrong character typed in, or missing in the code, somewhere when integrating it into the last 3 carrier's. So I believe at this point in time for us motion rig users that use surge, the following carriers are broken and out of bounds until fixed. CVN-71 Theodore Roosevelt CVN-74 John C Stennis CVN-75 Harry S. Truman I have included a graph of a good working cat shot with surge and nose gear suspension deflection. The surge has been blunted with a 200hz notch filter in the export.lua in my futile attempt to remove the shakes. I can take it out now and get a crisper launch profile. Is this you confirming that the George Washington DOES NOT have the problem at all? If so… I will go ahead and risk my life.
BrassEm Posted May 2 Author Posted May 2 (edited) G'day Bojanglez, It would appear so. I have flown for several days with many cat shots without issue on the George Washington. I have not tried any other CVN yet. I am just really enjoying jumping in, getting to the cat and go without issues. It is not the answer as the CVN's are still broken, but at least we get to fly properly (and safely) on one. Edited May 2 by BrassEm 1 www.brass-em.com
Bojanglez Posted May 23 Posted May 23 I confirm! CVN-73. no issue!! Im doing boat things now… please ED still fix the other carriers. We are very limited still in multiplayer. Miz makers and server hosts wont consider this issue when choosing carriers. 1
Flappie Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago I've added this precious information to the internal report (CVN-73 unaffected). ---
Recommended Posts