Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As far as I understand it the missile should be "cut off" the aircrafts datalink once a lock is droped / radar off.

 

 

We tested this. Locked a target - fire missile at Rmax - drop the lock / radar off - wait ten seconds - reaquire the lock.

 

 

TacView showed the missile kinda lost in its loft trajectory after stoping to support it. But once the target was reaquired by the aircraft radar, the missile put it's nose down and corrected its flightpath.

 

 

 

This hints to the missile being supported by a reaquired lock even though it shouldn't.

 

 

Am I wrong or is the missile?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Posted
The 120 doesn't instantly lock the the target off the rail. It has to be supported initially.

 

you can shoot a 120 and it will find a target on its own.

Intel i9-9900K 32GB DDR4, RTX 2080tiftw3, Windows 10, 1tb 970 M2, TM Warthog, 4k 144hz HDR g-sync.

Posted

the missile should actually continue to its latest calculated interception point and then turn on its on-board radar

not just "go stupid" and continue along its last trajectory

i7-4790K | Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkI | 16Gb DDR3 | EVGA GTX 980 | TM Warthog | MFG Crosswind | Panasonic TC-58AX800U

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
the missile should actually continue to its latest calculated interception point and then turn on its on-board radar

not just "go stupid" and continue along its last trajectory

it should, but the AIM-120C in DCS, it goes to the last point the target was detected, not the interception point. At least in the Hornet.

The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

CVW-17_Profile_Background_VFA-34.png

F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3
-
i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro

Posted

true ---- maybe ED will see this and add that functionality into the A120...

i7-4790K | Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkI | 16Gb DDR3 | EVGA GTX 980 | TM Warthog | MFG Crosswind | Panasonic TC-58AX800U

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
The 120 doesn't instantly lock the the target off the rail. It has to be supported initially.

 

 

Well, yeah, that's basically what my post is about.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Posted
Perhaps the missile entered the 15km active range?

 

 

No, don't thinkso. Tested both scenarios: Without reaquiring the lock and with reaquiring.

 

 

There was a noteable difference in its flight-profile.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Posted
the missile should actually continue to its latest calculated interception point and then turn on its on-board radar

not just "go stupid" and continue along its last trajectory

 

 

It flew (lofting) towards the position the target was at at launch (not going stupid) but corrected once the lock was reacquired.

 

 

 

That hinted to be caused by a reestablished datalink to the aircraft, which shouldn't happen.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Posted
it should, but the AIM-120C in DCS, it goes to the last point the target was detected, not the interception point. At least in the Hornet.

 

 

That's a thing I didn't even was aware of.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Posted
That's a thing I didn't even was aware of.
It's the same thing that happened to you, as per your description that the missile flew towards the point where the target was at launch. I'm assuming that you cut off radar support immediately after launch.

 

If you maintain the lock and cut support later, the missile will fly to the last point the target was detected. If it hasn't gone active in the meantime, of course.

The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

CVW-17_Profile_Background_VFA-34.png

F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3
-
i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro

Posted

Yes, we figured that as long as you support it for at least 10 - 15 seconds performance increases significantly.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...