Furiz Posted October 28, 2021 Posted October 28, 2021 1 hour ago, QuiGon said: To be transparent to their customers. Saying "we have proof" and not showing it, while there is no indication anywhere else that what they say is actually true, gives a shady impression. Personally, I will give ED the benefit of the doubt and I'm willing to believe them to be correct, if they say they actually have proof, but it's not the best way to gain the trust of your customers to hold it back. Transparency is good, but the problem is that they can't be transparent as much as we would like them to, the risk of being transparent in ED's case, the lawsuits, loss of their sources, loss of SMEs and loss of military partners outweighs the benefit of being transparent to customers, so in my opinion they don't have to be transparent and I will give them the benefit of the doubt. 1
QuiGon Posted October 28, 2021 Author Posted October 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Furiz said: Transparency is good, but the problem is that they can't be transparent as much as we would like them to, the risk of being transparent in ED's case, the lawsuits, loss of their sources, loss of SMEs and loss of military partners outweighs the benefit of being transparent to customers, so in my opinion they don't have to be transparent and I will give them the benefit of the doubt. And so do I, as I do understand that there are legit reasons against transparency. I'm just saying it's not as reassuring than providing actual proof, but it is what it is. 1 Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Dannyvandelft Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 They don't "need" to do anything. Don't like HARM on station 4 and 6? Check the mark for restrictions on loadouts. Wasn't that easy? Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk 1
Recommended Posts