Yuya6104 Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Isnt this suppose be in the Wish list forum not in KA-50 forum? ED is a Russian company and i belive we will see more Russian planes but since Russian planes are more secertive an hear so less an less an very few pictures or manuals then they telling.. but in western not so sectitive really they talk to much give to many hinits.. so far i know if ED does make another Russian plane be mostly see one that from 1980's or mid 90's planes.. since ED makeing US Figther no one knows what plane but they know that what makes it interesting is surprise an who knows be anything from a Figther Prop or a Jet or be something out of Star Wars.. What i would really like to see is the Su-24 jet now that controls will keep you so beyound busy but again its 2 Seater and ED not ready for that so again who knows what ED cooking up at there center in Moscow, Russia.. ^^
shu77 Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Hornet! Hornet, Super Carrier, Warthog & (II), Mustang, Spitfire, Albatross, Sabre, Combined Arms, FC3, Nevada, Gulf, Normandy, Syria AH-6J i9 10900K @ 5.0GHz, Gigabyte Z490 Vision G, Cooler Master ML120L, Gigabyte RTX3080 OC Gaming 10Gb, 64GB RAM, Reverb G2 @ 2480x2428, TM Warthog, Saitek pedals & throttle, DIY collective, TrackIR4, Cougar MFDs, vx3276-2k Combat Wombat's Airfield & Enroute Maps and Planning Tools
Chrisakky Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Anything which ED has a contract for, il be happy with. YouTube channel
Cedaway Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Anything which ED has a contract for, il be happy with. If ED has contract with the US Navy then I hope it's to provide a F/A-18 trainer else goto line 1:music_whistling: DCS Wish: Turbulences affecting surrounding aircraft... [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - Intel Core i5 6600K - 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming - 8 Go - 2 x SSD Crucial MX300 - 750 Go RAID0 - Screens: HP OMEN 32'' 2560x1440 + Oculus Rift CV1 - Win 10 - 64bits - TM WARTHOG #889 - Saitek Pro Rudder.
power5 Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 ED is a Russian company and i belive we will see more Russian planes but since Russian planes are more secertive an hear so less an less an very few pictures or manuals then they telling.. but in western not so sectitive really they talk to much give to many hinits.. since ED makeing US Figther no one knows what plane but they know that what makes it interesting is surprise an who knows be anything from a Figther Prop or a Jet or be something out of Star Wars.. What i would really like to see is the Su-24 jet now that controls will keep you so beyound busy but again its 2 Seater and ED not ready for that so again who knows what ED cooking up at there center in Moscow, Russia.. ^^ F14 is western and still classified. ED does not build sims on hints, they do it on solid facts. No idea about how long russia keeps planes classified, but the F14 has been out of service for like 10+ years. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Aaron i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5 BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109
Isegrim Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 ED Forums » English » Digital Combat Simulator » DCS: Ka-50 Black Shark » Most wanted DCS airplane... Poll about Fixed wings in the KA50 Topic -1000100 :mad: "Blyat Naaaaa" - Izlom
Krippz Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 Poll about Fixed wings in the KA50 Topic -1000100 :mad: This poll originated before A-10C so it's not really a big deal dude. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
Yuya6104 Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 F14 is western and still classified. ED does not build sims on hints, they do it on solid facts. No idea about how long russia keeps planes classified, but the F14 has been out of service for like 10+ years. Power..my english not so perfect..what i mean is that ED build sims if can accuare flight manuals so on from real plane..about F14 yes its classified and americans retired it from service.. to me that was a big big mistake for them now carriers so open for an attack enemy can launch its missles from 450 Km to 1500 Km with no warning an dought F/A-18C or E up for that task.. they could given up F-14 an tear it down fully upgrade that plane with japanese avonics an controls leaveing most systems like radar etc way it is unless neccery upgrade radar..
GGTharos Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 F-18E will do the job just fine. The F-14 had to go. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
power5 Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 You are not getting within 1500km of a US carrier without the carrier and its support ships knowing about it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Aaron i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5 BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109
redtail Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 i wonder why the F15 eagle did so poorly in the poll! although I personally want to see a Falcon or Hornet :) ~Redtail~ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Scrape Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 i wonder why the F15 eagle did so poorly in the poll! although I personally want to see a Falcon or Hornet :) I would guess that people feel that after flaming cliffs 2 there isn't a lot of room for variety. The F15C is a strait forward aircraft. I feel that the F15E would have been a nice addition to the list and warranted. No one had attempted to takle that jet for many many years "It's amazing, even at the Formula 1 level how many drivers still think the brakes are for slowing the car down."
dikkeduif Posted April 22, 2011 Posted April 22, 2011 Tonight I had a dream that ED releases an F-16, so it must be true! :o
Jasper2610 Posted April 25, 2011 Posted April 25, 2011 (edited) FA-18 E Super Hornet Edited April 25, 2011 by Jasper2610 TehgRa (n-TehgRa-tea)
Sinky Posted April 25, 2011 Posted April 25, 2011 I vote we get one of these for taking out infantry, would make for a change. On a serious note, I'd like to see the Tornado or a Harrier. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] ASUS M4A785D-M Pro | XFX 650W XXX | AMD Phenom II X4 B55 Black Edition 3.2ghz | 4GB Corsair XMS2 DHX 800mhz | XFX HD 5770 1GB @ 850/1200 | Windows 7 64bit | Logitech G35 | Logitech Mx518 | TrackIR 4 My TrackIR Profile ( Speed 1.2 / Smooth 30 ) - Right click & save as.
KosPilot Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 Try the other way around. A study to upgrade the AH-64A avionics and targeting package strated in 1988. However, the AH-64A did not receive any significant upgrades to its targeting and avionics suite until 1997, when delivery of AH-64D started. AH-64As still in service received this upgrade and are thus not AH-64A anymore. The workings of AH-64D capabilities and avionics suite is still classified and would not appear in a study sim anytime soon. The most recent upgrade known to me of the AH-1W, commenced in 1996 and comprised NTS/Canopy/Cockpit Modification (CCM) (NTS, Night Trageting System) that replaced the existing canopy, nose faring, and copilot/gunner instrument panel to make provisions for the AN/AWS-1(V)1 NTS and added the TNS, CDU-800, to the front cockpit. Additionally, a communication/navigation upgrade, ECP 1686, incorporated an ARC-210(V) Electronic Protection (EP) Radio, an ARN-153(V)4 TACAN, and an AN/ASN-163 Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System (EGI). So, Mr "Moderator/ED Testers Team", if you have other information, please share.
GGTharos Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 You mean to say that the Apache's original capabilities were not superior to that of the Ka-50? The upgrades are irrelevant in that respect. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
KosPilot Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 You mean to say that the Apache's original capabilities were not superior to that of the Ka-50? The upgrades are irrelevant in that respect. No, I am comparing AH-1W (post 1996 upgrade) with AH-64A (pre D-series) at their current state in 1996-97, making a point that I think AH-1W would be a decent choice for ED to add to their DCS series (The Ka-50 was introduced in 1995). Ka-50 was never mentioned in my previous posts.
GGTharos Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 I was responding to someone saying that the Ka-50 was more advanced than the Apache, I'm sure ... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Isegrim Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 (edited) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooivalk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agusta_A129_Mangusta Those are also Interesting My Fav of those both is the Rooivalk :thumbup: 700+ km Range and Precision gun mode. Sounds good to me. Comparing the KA 50 and the AH 64 is nearly like Comparing Ferrari and Lamborghini for me. Edited April 26, 2011 by Isegrim "Blyat Naaaaa" - Izlom
KosPilot Posted April 27, 2011 Posted April 27, 2011 I was responding to someone saying that the Ka-50 was more advanced than the Apache, I'm sure ... Ah, I was editing while you answered, that explains it! :D
Recommended Posts