correct as-is Tail Heavyness exaggerated

[fapador]

@grafspeeYes the G-12 has stuff in the tail. Thats a whole second cockpit... It also lacks armament as an offset. I dont believe its less tail heavy than a fully armed K-4. It surely is lighter though as @Yo-Yo said

[grafspee]

It's is definitely balanced in that way that is flyable

[fapador]

So yeah. in my experience in tail draggers 40kmh discrepancy in tail rise is too much. I would expect 10km declination according to the video I posted. I would even take 20kmh but not 40...

[grafspee]

K-4 is heavier.

[NineLine]

2 hours ago, fapador said:

So yeah. in my experience in tail draggers 40kmh discrepancy in tail rise is too much. I would expect 10km declination according to the video I posted. I would even take 20kmh but not 40...

You have no experience in the 109, and you only have a video of a civilian 109. You have not brought anything to suggest there is anything wrong. Sorry. It remains correct as is. Thanks.