DaleRFU Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 Hi there, I'd be really cool if we could get a greater variety of AI tankers for A2A refueling. Aircraft such as: A330 Voyager/MRTT KC-46 Tristar VC-10 Cheers 3
Vampyre Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 Victor K2 KC-97 KB-50 As for the KC-10, I'd like to see that as a full fidelity flyable at some point. 2 Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills. If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! "If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!"
79Au Posted April 29, 2023 Posted April 29, 2023 Yes please ED add a KC-10 KA-3 is my favorite Navy tanker, but I'm also looking forward to the updated S-3 tanker. If we'll ever see it released. ED should increase AI and statics production, in my opinion. 1 Modules: AH-64D, Mi-24P, UH-1H, F-14, F-18C, CA, SC Terrains: Sinai, Strait of Hormuz, Syria - Wishlist: Desert Storm map, 1950s Sinai, Navy Phantom, Mirage F1EQ, AH-64A, UH-60, MH-53, MiG-17/23/25/29, dynamic campaign, live/historical weather - smokes let's go
Vampyre Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 The KC-135 we have has a refueling receptacle. It is labeled as a KC-135R but it is actually a KC-135RT of which less than a dozen were built. I wouldn't mind seeing a KC-135A, KC-135E and KC-135R as variants of the KC-135 are the most numerous of all tankers. The A model would cover tankers from the 60's, 70's and early 80's. Also, the KA-6D is desirable as well... the S-3B would be worthy of a full fidelity as it is far more than just a tanker. My hope is that Heatblur will be able to implement a D-704 pod on its A-6E and if that is possible than that would open up so many more possibilities for tactical tanking with full fidelity modules. 2 Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills. If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! "If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!"
upyr1 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 11 hours ago, Vampyre said: The KC-135 we have has a refueling receptacle. It is labeled as a KC-135R but it is actually a KC-135RT of which less than a dozen were built. I wouldn't mind seeing a KC-135A, KC-135E and KC-135R as variants of the KC-135 are the most numerous of all tankers. The A model would cover tankers from the 60's, 70's and early 80's. Also, the KA-6D is desirable as well... the S-3B would be worthy of a full fidelity as it is far more than just a tanker. My hope is that Heatblur will be able to implement a D-704 pod on its A-6E and if that is possible than that would open up so many more possibilities for tactical tanking with full fidelity modules. I believe the KA-6 is planned
Silver_Dragon Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 7 minutes ago, upyr1 said: I believe the KA-6 is planned KA-6D has a AI planned by Heatblur with the A-6E. About the S-3B, remember he has not a dedicated tanker, has only a dedicated Antisubmarine/Patrol aircraft with a Buddy pod and a drop tank. Other aircrafs can be equiped with a Buddy pod, as a F/A-18E, A-4, A-7, KA-3B or a MQ-25 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
AG-51_Razor Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 As much as I whole heartedly support this request for additional tankers, I'd have to preface that with a simple request for some more tanker callsigns. I do realize that I am speaking from complete and total ignorance here but it just seems to me that, amongst some of the more outlandish requests seen in here, this one seems like it would be child's play to accomplish with very little effort - comparatively speaking of course. Please consider it. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Dragon1-1 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 Recording the voice lines is probably the biggest problem. Even if callsigns are added, they won't be spoken, none of the new callsigns are. It's hard to match new voice recordings with old ones, they'd have to re-record everything. It'll eventually happen, just not soon, I'm afraid.
Recommended Posts