Temetre Posted May 15, 2023 Posted May 15, 2023 (edited) Just wanna ask if theres anything new on mentioned topics? Couldnt find anything in the progress and news posts. Just if you want more specific what I mean: Damage to F-16 seems quite simplistic in some ways; you obviously dont "tank" damage in an aircraft, but its always massive fuel leakage, most of the time damage results in pilot kill, it doesnt feel realistic. Storage overstress isnt simulated, mostly no FPL features, etc. To some degree that also applies to the F-18, makes me wonder if theres shared systems being developed or so. Eg in an F-14 damage control and recovery is actually pretty interesting imo. Edited May 15, 2023 by Temetre 6
twistking Posted June 3, 2023 Posted June 3, 2023 yes, damage modeling is poor for both the 16 and 18... 2 My improved* wishlist after a decade with DCS *now with 17% more wishes compared to the original
Terzi Posted June 7, 2023 Posted June 7, 2023 Yes when you take a minor damage your fuel will very rapidly drop to 0 lbs at a constant speed. This legendary module deserves better 2 [CENTER] [/CENTER]
Temetre Posted June 7, 2023 Author Posted June 7, 2023 (edited) It seems clearly incomplete, I can accept that with an EA module. But its so strange this stuff isnt even on the roadmap. Still flying the F-14 currently, which seems to have a much more granular damage model, its a massive difference. Edited June 7, 2023 by Temetre
Miro Posted June 7, 2023 Posted June 7, 2023 From almost every missile You will die, 8/10 small missiles exploding even near engine will kill pilot. 5 :pilotfly:
Recommended Posts